Re: Benchmarking Tomcat 4.0 + Apache 1.3.XX + webapp against Tomcat 4 .0

[David Cassidy <dc...@hotgen.com>]

How about apache 2 and tomcat 3.2.3 ?

Thats the one I'd like to know ...

David


GOMEZ Henri wrote:

>
>
> I've got some benchs :
>
> TC 3.3 stand-alone
> TC 3.3 + mod_jk / ajp13
> TC 4.0 stand-alone
> TC 4.0 + mod_jk / ajp13
> TC 4.0 + mod_webapp
>
> It's attached :)
>
> -
> Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
> EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Parashar, Hitesh [mailto:Hitesh.Parashar@Avnet.com]
> >Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:37 PM
> >To: Tomcat Users List
> >Subject: Benchmarking Tomcat 4.0 + Apache 1.3.XX + webapp
> >against Tomcat
> >4 .0
> >
> >
> >Hi Cats and Toms:
> >
> >How does trio of "Tomcat 4 + Apache 1.3.xx + webapp module"
> >perform compared
> >to the lonely Tomcat 4.0 for static content? Has anyone done any
> >benchmarking on this?
> >
> >If the performance degraded is not very substantial then we
> >would like to go
> >without the PINTA(ss) Apache/webapp/Tomcat. Another thing by
> >using Tomcat
> >4.0 alone that we will get is JBoss embedded Tomcat service
> >which will not
> >require any modifications for webapp in server.xml.
> >
> >Any "hard-evidence" for Tomcat 4.0 being equally fast as
> >Apache+Tomcat for
> >static content post-4.0?
> >
> >TIA,
> >
> >Hitesh.
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> >For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> >Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> >
>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>