You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Vladimir Sitnikov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/02/27 07:13:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4514) Fine tune the merge order of two
RelSets, cache RelSet's childSet computation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17292039#comment-17292039 ]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-4514:
--------------------------------------------
Are we using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjoint-set_data_structure#Merging_two_sets here?
Then {{set2.getChildSets(this).contains(set)}} looks strange.
Do we really need it there?
> Fine tune the merge order of two RelSets, cache RelSet's childSet computation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-4514
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4514
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Botong Huang
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When merging two relsets, we have two preferences:
> 1. Merge parent relset into child relset
> 2. Merge newer relset into older relset
> Currently, when the two relsets are parent set of each other, we randomly pick a merge order without checking the second condition above. For performance reasons, we should, to avoid unnecessary churn.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)