You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/10 01:20:52 UTC
[VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Round 3, everyone. Changes over RC2:
* Manually set tarLongFileMode=gnu for maven-assembly-plugin
* Remove maven-source-plugin as Apache parent pom provides this
* Remove unnecessary entries from LICENSE and NOTICE
* Add LICENSE and NOTICE to the archetype such that the project the
archetype generates also has said LICENSE and NOTICE
* Rename artifact from 'instamo-archetype' to
'accumulo-instamo-archetype' for clarity
Git repo:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-archetype.git
Tag: 1.4.4 (f2b2e49ec8ce9a60c298ccdcfc763a6fd05f8da1)
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/
Source release tarball:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo-instamo-archetype/1.4.4/accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.4.4-source-release.tar.gz
Pending successful vote after 72hrs, the staging repo will be promoted.
I changed how I was doing things before "1.4.4-RCx" tags as it would
require more manual intervention in the release process. (sidebar: will
be writing up this information on the website to make 1.6.0 hopefully
easier)
- Josh
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Uhhh, Mike --
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/archetype-catalog.xml
I'm confused as to what you meant now (still working on adding the
staging repo locally to test it out properly).
On 10/13/13 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> The released tarball has a DEPENDENCIES file that is not in source control.
> I think we talked about this last time, but wanted to confirm that you were
> aware of this. All other files match. I don't think this is an issue, since
> iirc that file is auto-gen'd.
>
> Signature on the source release matches the one in the KEYS file.
>
> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn install
> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I install
> however, everything works fine.
>
> +1, but I definitely want to see the archetype-catalog.xml taken care of
> for the next release. Not going to be picky about it on this one because
> there is an easy workaround. (Maybe it needs to be documented somewhere,
> though?)
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for taking the time to review, Keith.
>>
>> This is scheduled to close tonight. Can any other devs weigh in, please?
>>
>>
>> On 10/11/2013 05:35 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>>
>>> signature and checksum on the soruce tar looks good.
>>> Runs fine
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Round 3, everyone. Changes over RC2:
>>>>
>>>> * Manually set tarLongFileMode=gnu for maven-assembly-plugin
>>>> * Remove maven-source-plugin as Apache parent pom provides this
>>>> * Remove unnecessary entries from LICENSE and NOTICE
>>>> * Add LICENSE and NOTICE to the archetype such that the project the
>>>> archetype generates also has said LICENSE and NOTICE
>>>> * Rename artifact from 'instamo-archetype' to
>>>> 'accumulo-instamo-archetype'
>>>> for clarity
>>>>
>>>> Git repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/****repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-*
>>>> *** <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-**>
>>>> archetype.git<https://git-wip-**us.apache.org/repos/asf/**
>>>> accumulo-instamo-archetype.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-archetype.git>
>>>> **>
>>>> Tag: 1.4.4 (****f2b2e49ec8ce9a60c298ccdcfc763a****6fd05f8da1)
>>>> Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/****content/repositories/**<https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**>
>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-156/<https:/**/repository.apache.org/**
>>>> content/repositories/**orgapacheaccumulo-156/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/>
>>>>>
>>>> Source release tarball: https://repository.apache.org/****<https://repository.apache.org/**>
>>>> content/repositories/****orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/**
>>>> apache/accumulo/accumulo-****instamo-archetype/1.4.4/**
>>>> accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.****4.4-source-release.tar.gz<htt**
>>>> ps://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>>>> orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/**apache/accumulo/accumulo-**
>>>> instamo-archetype/1.4.4/**accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.**
>>>> 4.4-source-release.tar.gz<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo-instamo-archetype/1.4.4/accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.4.4-source-release.tar.gz>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pending successful vote after 72hrs, the staging repo will be promoted. I
>>>> changed how I was doing things before "1.4.4-RCx" tags as it would
>>>> require
>>>> more manual intervention in the release process. (sidebar: will be
>>>> writing
>>>> up this information on the website to make 1.6.0 hopefully easier)
>>>>
>>>> - Josh
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Done. I'll add a note on the "release notes" ticket I started for this.
On 10/19/13 1:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
> As a test, would you mind replacing the lightweight tag with a GPG
> signed tag? (like an annotated tag, but with -s instead of -a). I'm
> thinking we should be doing that for all our release tags, and this is
> a good opportunity to try it out on a sub-project first.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Finally getting around to closing this. Ultimately passes with 4 +1's
>>
>>
>> On 10/15/2013 3:59 PM, Christopher wrote:
>>>
>>> If you need another vote, you can have my +1
>>>
>>> I verified:
>>>
>>> * good GPG sigs, sha1s, md5s
>>> * source tarball and zip match git tag (except generated DEPENDENCIES
>>> file, which is okay)
>>> * HEAD of tag matches specified commit sha1
>>> * tag builds reproducibly (mvn verify -P apache-release)
>>> * can create new project from archetype in staging repo
>>> * created project can build (mvn verify)
>>> * created project can run MapReduce and shell commands in README
>>> * no obvious problems in POM
>>> * contents of jar files look fine
>>>
>>> Encountered issues (not serious, can be improved in future releases or
>>> not at all):
>>>
>>> * not sure tarLongFileMode=gnu worked (file *.tar.gz still reports it
>>> as "gzip compressed data, from FAT filesystem")
>>> * unit test that starts mini should be IT instead
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I apparently shouldn't have taken Mike's word as gospel :)
>>>>
>>>> <profile>
>>>> <id>instamo-staging</id>
>>>> <repositories>
>>>> <repository>
>>>> <id>instamo</id>
>>>> <name>ASF staging repo</name>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/</url>
>>>> <layout>default</layout>
>>>> </repository>
>>>> </repositories>
>>>> </profile>
>>>>
>>>> in my settings.xml, and invoking
>>>>
>>>> mvn -Pinstamo-staging archetype:generate
>>>> -DarchetypeArtifactId=accumulo-instamo-archetype -DarchetypeVersion=1.4.4
>>>> -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.accumulo
>>>>
>>>> Worked for me. Can someone else verify please? I "technically" never
>>>> closed
>>>> the vote (I guess?), so I change my -1 to a +1. I'd still like to get
>>>> another vote from the community though to make sure it's kosher.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/14/13 11:19 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yah, I agree.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it comes down to having to write something else just to get what we
>>>>> want to begin with (one-command install), we should just do it
>>>>> correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Self -1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/14/2013 11:15 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the big advantages of an archetype is that it's convenient and
>>>>>> consistent to use...I agree that requiring a download and install in
>>>>>> order
>>>>>> to use the archetype really cuts down on its usefulness. I don't get a
>>>>>> vote, but if I did, I think I would need a clean invocation path in
>>>>>> order
>>>>>> to give my +1. (And I don't think a custom one-off shell script that
>>>>>> messes with someone's local repo would qualify)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013 12:14 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, dang.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download,
>>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to
>>>>>>> be run
>>>>>>> to get up and running.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could wrap this up in a shell script? Installing to the local
>>>>>>> repo/catalog
>>>>>>> is a pretty nasty side effect though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on
>>>>>>> whether
>>>>>>> or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code.
>>>>>>> Thanks for
>>>>>>> the information either way, Mike.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> however, everything works fine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
As a test, would you mind replacing the lightweight tag with a GPG
signed tag? (like an annotated tag, but with -s instead of -a). I'm
thinking we should be doing that for all our release tags, and this is
a good opportunity to try it out on a sub-project first.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Finally getting around to closing this. Ultimately passes with 4 +1's
>
>
> On 10/15/2013 3:59 PM, Christopher wrote:
>>
>> If you need another vote, you can have my +1
>>
>> I verified:
>>
>> * good GPG sigs, sha1s, md5s
>> * source tarball and zip match git tag (except generated DEPENDENCIES
>> file, which is okay)
>> * HEAD of tag matches specified commit sha1
>> * tag builds reproducibly (mvn verify -P apache-release)
>> * can create new project from archetype in staging repo
>> * created project can build (mvn verify)
>> * created project can run MapReduce and shell commands in README
>> * no obvious problems in POM
>> * contents of jar files look fine
>>
>> Encountered issues (not serious, can be improved in future releases or
>> not at all):
>>
>> * not sure tarLongFileMode=gnu worked (file *.tar.gz still reports it
>> as "gzip compressed data, from FAT filesystem")
>> * unit test that starts mini should be IT instead
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, I apparently shouldn't have taken Mike's word as gospel :)
>>>
>>> <profile>
>>> <id>instamo-staging</id>
>>> <repositories>
>>> <repository>
>>> <id>instamo</id>
>>> <name>ASF staging repo</name>
>>>
>>>
>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/</url>
>>> <layout>default</layout>
>>> </repository>
>>> </repositories>
>>> </profile>
>>>
>>> in my settings.xml, and invoking
>>>
>>> mvn -Pinstamo-staging archetype:generate
>>> -DarchetypeArtifactId=accumulo-instamo-archetype -DarchetypeVersion=1.4.4
>>> -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.accumulo
>>>
>>> Worked for me. Can someone else verify please? I "technically" never
>>> closed
>>> the vote (I guess?), so I change my -1 to a +1. I'd still like to get
>>> another vote from the community though to make sure it's kosher.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/14/13 11:19 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yah, I agree.
>>>>
>>>> If it comes down to having to write something else just to get what we
>>>> want to begin with (one-command install), we should just do it
>>>> correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Self -1
>>>>
>>>> On 10/14/2013 11:15 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the big advantages of an archetype is that it's convenient and
>>>>> consistent to use...I agree that requiring a download and install in
>>>>> order
>>>>> to use the archetype really cuts down on its usefulness. I don't get a
>>>>> vote, but if I did, I think I would need a clean invocation path in
>>>>> order
>>>>> to give my +1. (And I don't think a custom one-off shell script that
>>>>> messes with someone's local repo would qualify)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013 12:14 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, dang.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download,
>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to
>>>>>> be run
>>>>>> to get up and running.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could wrap this up in a shell script? Installing to the local
>>>>>> repo/catalog
>>>>>> is a pretty nasty side effect though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on
>>>>>> whether
>>>>>> or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code.
>>>>>> Thanks for
>>>>>> the information either way, Mike.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> however, everything works fine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Finally getting around to closing this. Ultimately passes with 4 +1's
On 10/15/2013 3:59 PM, Christopher wrote:
> If you need another vote, you can have my +1
>
> I verified:
>
> * good GPG sigs, sha1s, md5s
> * source tarball and zip match git tag (except generated DEPENDENCIES
> file, which is okay)
> * HEAD of tag matches specified commit sha1
> * tag builds reproducibly (mvn verify -P apache-release)
> * can create new project from archetype in staging repo
> * created project can build (mvn verify)
> * created project can run MapReduce and shell commands in README
> * no obvious problems in POM
> * contents of jar files look fine
>
> Encountered issues (not serious, can be improved in future releases or
> not at all):
>
> * not sure tarLongFileMode=gnu worked (file *.tar.gz still reports it
> as "gzip compressed data, from FAT filesystem")
> * unit test that starts mini should be IT instead
>
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok, I apparently shouldn't have taken Mike's word as gospel :)
>>
>> <profile>
>> <id>instamo-staging</id>
>> <repositories>
>> <repository>
>> <id>instamo</id>
>> <name>ASF staging repo</name>
>>
>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/</url>
>> <layout>default</layout>
>> </repository>
>> </repositories>
>> </profile>
>>
>> in my settings.xml, and invoking
>>
>> mvn -Pinstamo-staging archetype:generate
>> -DarchetypeArtifactId=accumulo-instamo-archetype -DarchetypeVersion=1.4.4
>> -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.accumulo
>>
>> Worked for me. Can someone else verify please? I "technically" never closed
>> the vote (I guess?), so I change my -1 to a +1. I'd still like to get
>> another vote from the community though to make sure it's kosher.
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/13 11:19 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>
>>> Yah, I agree.
>>>
>>> If it comes down to having to write something else just to get what we
>>> want to begin with (one-command install), we should just do it correctly.
>>>
>>> Self -1
>>>
>>> On 10/14/2013 11:15 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> One of the big advantages of an archetype is that it's convenient and
>>>> consistent to use...I agree that requiring a download and install in
>>>> order
>>>> to use the archetype really cuts down on its usefulness. I don't get a
>>>> vote, but if I did, I think I would need a clean invocation path in order
>>>> to give my +1. (And I don't think a custom one-off shell script that
>>>> messes with someone's local repo would qualify)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013 12:14 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, dang.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download, install
>>>>>
>>>>> and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to
>>>>> be run
>>>>> to get up and running.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could wrap this up in a shell script? Installing to the local
>>>>> repo/catalog
>>>>> is a pretty nasty side effect though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
>>>>>
>>>>> repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on
>>>>> whether
>>>>> or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code.
>>>>> Thanks for
>>>>> the information either way, Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn
>>>>>
>>>>> install
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I
>>>>>
>>>>> install
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> however, everything works fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
If you need another vote, you can have my +1
I verified:
* good GPG sigs, sha1s, md5s
* source tarball and zip match git tag (except generated DEPENDENCIES
file, which is okay)
* HEAD of tag matches specified commit sha1
* tag builds reproducibly (mvn verify -P apache-release)
* can create new project from archetype in staging repo
* created project can build (mvn verify)
* created project can run MapReduce and shell commands in README
* no obvious problems in POM
* contents of jar files look fine
Encountered issues (not serious, can be improved in future releases or
not at all):
* not sure tarLongFileMode=gnu worked (file *.tar.gz still reports it
as "gzip compressed data, from FAT filesystem")
* unit test that starts mini should be IT instead
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I apparently shouldn't have taken Mike's word as gospel :)
>
> <profile>
> <id>instamo-staging</id>
> <repositories>
> <repository>
> <id>instamo</id>
> <name>ASF staging repo</name>
>
> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/</url>
> <layout>default</layout>
> </repository>
> </repositories>
> </profile>
>
> in my settings.xml, and invoking
>
> mvn -Pinstamo-staging archetype:generate
> -DarchetypeArtifactId=accumulo-instamo-archetype -DarchetypeVersion=1.4.4
> -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.accumulo
>
> Worked for me. Can someone else verify please? I "technically" never closed
> the vote (I guess?), so I change my -1 to a +1. I'd still like to get
> another vote from the community though to make sure it's kosher.
>
>
> On 10/14/13 11:19 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>> Yah, I agree.
>>
>> If it comes down to having to write something else just to get what we
>> want to begin with (one-command install), we should just do it correctly.
>>
>> Self -1
>>
>> On 10/14/2013 11:15 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
>>>
>>> One of the big advantages of an archetype is that it's convenient and
>>> consistent to use...I agree that requiring a download and install in
>>> order
>>> to use the archetype really cuts down on its usefulness. I don't get a
>>> vote, but if I did, I think I would need a clean invocation path in order
>>> to give my +1. (And I don't think a custom one-off shell script that
>>> messes with someone's local repo would qualify)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Oct 14, 2013 12:14 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, dang.
>>>>>
>>>>> My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download, install
>>>>
>>>> and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to
>>>> be run
>>>> to get up and running.
>>>>
>>>> Could wrap this up in a shell script? Installing to the local
>>>> repo/catalog
>>>> is a pretty nasty side effect though.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
>>>>
>>>> repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on
>>>> whether
>>>> or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code.
>>>> Thanks for
>>>> the information either way, Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn
>>>>
>>>> install
>>>>>>
>>>>>> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I
>>>>
>>>> install
>>>>>>
>>>>>> however, everything works fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I apparently shouldn't have taken Mike's word as gospel :)
<profile>
<id>instamo-staging</id>
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>instamo</id>
<name>ASF staging repo</name>
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/</url>
<layout>default</layout>
</repository>
</repositories>
</profile>
in my settings.xml, and invoking
mvn -Pinstamo-staging archetype:generate
-DarchetypeArtifactId=accumulo-instamo-archetype
-DarchetypeVersion=1.4.4 -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.accumulo
Worked for me. Can someone else verify please? I "technically" never
closed the vote (I guess?), so I change my -1 to a +1. I'd still like to
get another vote from the community though to make sure it's kosher.
On 10/14/13 11:19 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Yah, I agree.
>
> If it comes down to having to write something else just to get what we
> want to begin with (one-command install), we should just do it correctly.
>
> Self -1
>
> On 10/14/2013 11:15 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
>> One of the big advantages of an archetype is that it's convenient and
>> consistent to use...I agree that requiring a download and install in
>> order
>> to use the archetype really cuts down on its usefulness. I don't get a
>> vote, but if I did, I think I would need a clean invocation path in order
>> to give my +1. (And I don't think a custom one-off shell script that
>> messes with someone's local repo would qualify)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2013 12:14 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Well, dang.
>>>>
>>>> My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download, install
>>> and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to
>>> be run
>>> to get up and running.
>>>
>>> Could wrap this up in a shell script? Installing to the local
>>> repo/catalog
>>> is a pretty nasty side effect though.
>>>> I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
>>> repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on
>>> whether
>>> or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code.
>>> Thanks for
>>> the information either way, Mike.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn
>>> install
>>>>> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I
>>> install
>>>>> however, everything works fine.
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Yah, I agree.
If it comes down to having to write something else just to get what we
want to begin with (one-command install), we should just do it correctly.
Self -1
On 10/14/2013 11:15 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
> One of the big advantages of an archetype is that it's convenient and
> consistent to use...I agree that requiring a download and install in order
> to use the archetype really cuts down on its usefulness. I don't get a
> vote, but if I did, I think I would need a clean invocation path in order
> to give my +1. (And I don't think a custom one-off shell script that
> messes with someone's local repo would qualify)
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 14, 2013 12:14 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Well, dang.
>>>
>>> My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download, install
>> and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to be run
>> to get up and running.
>>
>> Could wrap this up in a shell script? Installing to the local repo/catalog
>> is a pretty nasty side effect though.
>>> I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
>> repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on whether
>> or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code. Thanks for
>> the information either way, Mike.
>>>
>>> On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>>> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn
>> install
>>>> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I
>> install
>>>> however, everything works fine.
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com>.
One of the big advantages of an archetype is that it's convenient and
consistent to use...I agree that requiring a download and install in order
to use the archetype really cuts down on its usefulness. I don't get a
vote, but if I did, I think I would need a clean invocation path in order
to give my +1. (And I don't think a custom one-off shell script that
messes with someone's local repo would qualify)
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2013 12:14 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Well, dang.
> >
> > My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download, install
> and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to be run
> to get up and running.
>
> Could wrap this up in a shell script? Installing to the local repo/catalog
> is a pretty nasty side effect though.
> >
> > I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
> repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on whether
> or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code. Thanks for
> the information either way, Mike.
> >
> >
> > On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> >>
> >> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn
> install
> >> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I
> install
> >> however, everything works fine.
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
On Oct 14, 2013 12:14 AM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, dang.
>
> My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download, install
and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to be run
to get up and running.
Could wrap this up in a shell script? Installing to the local repo/catalog
is a pretty nasty side effect though.
>
> I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on whether
or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code. Thanks for
the information either way, Mike.
>
>
> On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>
>> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn install
>> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I
install
>> however, everything works fine.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Well, dang.
My intent was definitely to *not* make a user have to download, install
and then invoke the archetype, but provide a single maven command to be
run to get up and running.
I hate doing it, but that might be a non-starter (even as the guy
repeatedly cutting these releases). I haven't decided my opinion on
whether or not this is super important for a 1.4.x version of the code.
Thanks for the information either way, Mike.
On 10/13/2013 12:29 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn install
> before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I install
> however, everything works fine.
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
The released tarball has a DEPENDENCIES file that is not in source control.
I think we talked about this last time, but wanted to confirm that you were
aware of this. All other files match. I don't think this is an issue, since
iirc that file is auto-gen'd.
Signature on the source release matches the one in the KEYS file.
There is no archetype-catalog.xml file deployed, so I have to mvn install
before I am able to generate projects using the archetype. After I install
however, everything works fine.
+1, but I definitely want to see the archetype-catalog.xml taken care of
for the next release. Not going to be picky about it on this one because
there is an easy workaround. (Maybe it needs to be documented somewhere,
though?)
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to review, Keith.
>
> This is scheduled to close tonight. Can any other devs weigh in, please?
>
>
> On 10/11/2013 05:35 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
>
>> signature and checksum on the soruce tar looks good.
>> Runs fine
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Round 3, everyone. Changes over RC2:
>>>
>>> * Manually set tarLongFileMode=gnu for maven-assembly-plugin
>>> * Remove maven-source-plugin as Apache parent pom provides this
>>> * Remove unnecessary entries from LICENSE and NOTICE
>>> * Add LICENSE and NOTICE to the archetype such that the project the
>>> archetype generates also has said LICENSE and NOTICE
>>> * Rename artifact from 'instamo-archetype' to
>>> 'accumulo-instamo-archetype'
>>> for clarity
>>>
>>> Git repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/****repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-*
>>> *** <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-**>
>>> archetype.git<https://git-wip-**us.apache.org/repos/asf/**
>>> accumulo-instamo-archetype.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-archetype.git>
>>> **>
>>> Tag: 1.4.4 (****f2b2e49ec8ce9a60c298ccdcfc763a****6fd05f8da1)
>>> Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/****content/repositories/**<https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**>
>>> orgapacheaccumulo-156/<https:/**/repository.apache.org/**
>>> content/repositories/**orgapacheaccumulo-156/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/>
>>> >
>>> Source release tarball: https://repository.apache.org/****<https://repository.apache.org/**>
>>> content/repositories/****orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/**
>>> apache/accumulo/accumulo-****instamo-archetype/1.4.4/**
>>> accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.****4.4-source-release.tar.gz<htt**
>>> ps://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>>> orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/**apache/accumulo/accumulo-**
>>> instamo-archetype/1.4.4/**accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.**
>>> 4.4-source-release.tar.gz<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo-instamo-archetype/1.4.4/accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.4.4-source-release.tar.gz>
>>> >
>>>
>>> Pending successful vote after 72hrs, the staging repo will be promoted. I
>>> changed how I was doing things before "1.4.4-RCx" tags as it would
>>> require
>>> more manual intervention in the release process. (sidebar: will be
>>> writing
>>> up this information on the website to make 1.6.0 hopefully easier)
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for taking the time to review, Keith.
This is scheduled to close tonight. Can any other devs weigh in, please?
On 10/11/2013 05:35 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> signature and checksum on the soruce tar looks good.
> Runs fine
>
>
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Round 3, everyone. Changes over RC2:
>>
>> * Manually set tarLongFileMode=gnu for maven-assembly-plugin
>> * Remove maven-source-plugin as Apache parent pom provides this
>> * Remove unnecessary entries from LICENSE and NOTICE
>> * Add LICENSE and NOTICE to the archetype such that the project the
>> archetype generates also has said LICENSE and NOTICE
>> * Rename artifact from 'instamo-archetype' to 'accumulo-instamo-archetype'
>> for clarity
>>
>> Git repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-**
>> archetype.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-archetype.git>
>> Tag: 1.4.4 (**f2b2e49ec8ce9a60c298ccdcfc763a**6fd05f8da1)
>> Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>> orgapacheaccumulo-156/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/>
>> Source release tarball: https://repository.apache.org/**
>> content/repositories/**orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/**
>> apache/accumulo/accumulo-**instamo-archetype/1.4.4/**
>> accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.**4.4-source-release.tar.gz<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo-instamo-archetype/1.4.4/accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.4.4-source-release.tar.gz>
>>
>> Pending successful vote after 72hrs, the staging repo will be promoted. I
>> changed how I was doing things before "1.4.4-RCx" tags as it would require
>> more manual intervention in the release process. (sidebar: will be writing
>> up this information on the website to make 1.6.0 hopefully easier)
>>
>> - Josh
>>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Instamo Archetype 1.4.4-RC3
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
signature and checksum on the soruce tar looks good.
Runs fine
+1
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Round 3, everyone. Changes over RC2:
>
> * Manually set tarLongFileMode=gnu for maven-assembly-plugin
> * Remove maven-source-plugin as Apache parent pom provides this
> * Remove unnecessary entries from LICENSE and NOTICE
> * Add LICENSE and NOTICE to the archetype such that the project the
> archetype generates also has said LICENSE and NOTICE
> * Rename artifact from 'instamo-archetype' to 'accumulo-instamo-archetype'
> for clarity
>
> Git repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-**
> archetype.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo-instamo-archetype.git>
> Tag: 1.4.4 (**f2b2e49ec8ce9a60c298ccdcfc763a**6fd05f8da1)
> Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> orgapacheaccumulo-156/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/>
> Source release tarball: https://repository.apache.org/**
> content/repositories/**orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/**
> apache/accumulo/accumulo-**instamo-archetype/1.4.4/**
> accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.**4.4-source-release.tar.gz<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-156/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo-instamo-archetype/1.4.4/accumulo-instamo-archetype-1.4.4-source-release.tar.gz>
>
> Pending successful vote after 72hrs, the staging repo will be promoted. I
> changed how I was doing things before "1.4.4-RCx" tags as it would require
> more manual intervention in the release process. (sidebar: will be writing
> up this information on the website to make 1.6.0 hopefully easier)
>
> - Josh
>