You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by ant elder <an...@apache.org> on 2009/04/06 10:44:55 UTC
[VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Please review and vote on RC2 of the SCA 2.0-M2 release.
The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-M2-RC2/
The release tag is available at :
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M2/
+1 from me.
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
I was able to download and unzip the artifacts successfully, and all the
samples
worked fine for me.
+1 from me.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please review and vote on RC2 of the SCA 2.0-M2 release.
>
> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
> are available for review at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-M2-RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/2.0-M2-RC2/>
>
> The release tag is available at :
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M2/
>
> +1 from me.
>
> ...ant
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 1.1 xsd files. Can others give the change an eyeball to make sure that
>>> I have included the license and copyright statement correctly.
>>>
>>
>> The changes don't look to me like they've broken anything. Are there
>> any more changes need or shall i respin now?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
> That's all the blocking issues I noticed addressed.
>
> Simon
>
Cool ok thanks i'll respin now
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 1.1 xsd files. Can others give the change an eyeball to make sure that
>> I have included the license and copyright statement correctly.
>>
>
> The changes don't look to me like they've broken anything. Are there
> any more changes need or shall i respin now?
>
> ...ant
>
That's all the blocking issues I noticed addressed.
Simon
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 1.1 xsd files. Can others give the change an eyeball to make sure that
> I have included the license and copyright statement correctly.
>
The changes don't look to me like they've broken anything. Are there
any more changes need or shall i respin now?
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sure go ahead, let me know when you're done and I'll respin. AFAICT
>> we're fine to use the OASIS license.
>>
>> The Wicket module isn't finished yet, the webapp samples do work but I
>> was going to change them to be the same as what the archetypes create
>> but thats not done yet.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
> OK, am fixing up the non-OASIS license changes now. I'm told that the
> OASIS license should be attached to their source artifacts very soon
> so we can include that when done, respin the RC and close off the
> legal-discuss thread.
>
> Ok, understand about the webapp stuff.
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
>
OK, I've update the M2 branch (and trunk) with the OASIS license file
information that has been added to their repo [1] alongside the SCA
1.1 xsd files. Can others give the change an eyeball to make sure that
I have included the license and copyright statement correctly.
Regards
Simon
[1] http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/sca-assembly/SCA_XSDS/
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
>
> Sure go ahead, let me know when you're done and I'll respin. AFAICT
> we're fine to use the OASIS license.
>
> The Wicket module isn't finished yet, the webapp samples do work but I
> was going to change them to be the same as what the archetypes create
> but thats not done yet.
>
> ...ant
>
OK, am fixing up the non-OASIS license changes now. I'm told that the
OASIS license should be attached to their source artifacts very soon
so we can include that when done, respin the RC and close off the
legal-discuss thread.
Ok, understand about the webapp stuff.
Thanks
Simon
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "ant elder" <an...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:44 AM
>> To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
>>
>>> Please review and vote on RC2 of the SCA 2.0-M2 release.
>>>
>>> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
>>> are available for review at:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-M2-RC2/
>>>
>>> The release tag is available at :
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M2/
>>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>
>
> -1 from me.
>
> There are a few license funnies...
>
> assembly-xsd
> now has OASIS xsd but doesn't include OASIS details in LICENSE or NOTICE file
>
> Top level LICENSE
> doesn't include OASIS details
> doesn't include
> geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
> geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1.jar
> geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1.jar
> regexp-1.3.jar
>
> Top level NOTICE
> doesn't include OASIS details
>
> implementation-web-runtime
> now has sca.tld but doesn't include OSOA details in LICENSE/NOTICE
>
> host-webapp
> no longer has sca.tld but does include OSOA details in LICENSE/NOTICE
>
> I can go ahead and fix the easy things but where are we with the OASIS
> LICENSE question?
>
Sure go ahead, let me know when you're done and I'll respin. AFAICT
we're fine to use the OASIS license.
The Wicket module isn't finished yet, the webapp samples do work but I
was going to change them to be the same as what the archetypes create
but thats not done yet.
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "ant elder" <an...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:44 AM
> To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
>
>> Please review and vote on RC2 of the SCA 2.0-M2 release.
>>
>> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
>> are available for review at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-M2-RC2/
>>
>> The release tag is available at :
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M2/
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> ...ant
>
-1 from me.
There are a few license funnies...
assembly-xsd
now has OASIS xsd but doesn't include OASIS details in LICENSE or NOTICE file
Top level LICENSE
doesn't include OASIS details
doesn't include
geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1.jar
geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1.jar
regexp-1.3.jar
Top level NOTICE
doesn't include OASIS details
implementation-web-runtime
now has sca.tld but doesn't include OSOA details in LICENSE/NOTICE
host-webapp
no longer has sca.tld but does include OSOA details in LICENSE/NOTICE
I can go ahead and fix the easy things but where are we with the OASIS
LICENSE question?
I've run the sample and they are OK although there are a few
non-blocking issues in the READMEs that I'll try and tidy up.
I notice that not all of the things in the source release are in the
binary release. This is not a problem per-se but want to check that
this is intentional, in particular..
samples/webapp
modules/wicket
Were the obvious ones.
I'll try a source build but our auto testing is pretty good on that so
I'll post back here if I have problems.
Regards
Simon
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <an...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:44 AM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2
> Please review and vote on RC2 of the SCA 2.0-M2 release.
>
> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository
> are available for review at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-M2-RC2/
>
> The release tag is available at :
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M2/
>
> +1 from me.
>
> ...ant