You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Srepfler Srgjan <sr...@lnksystem.com> on 2006/08/13 00:57:59 UTC

Re: Java EE

Markus Wolf wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>   
>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
>>
>> Convention is to use the java package for java APIs as groupId.
>> So for example, the java connector API (jca) has groupId
>> "javax.resources". You can ask SUN and the JCA JSR members why the did
>> not use javax.jca or javax.connector as package name.
>>
>>     
> This does not hold for JSR-220 as far as I know.
> Use groupId javax.persistence and artifactId ejb for JSR-220.
> I mentioned already that javax.ejb would be a better groupId.
>
>   
Actually the the Java Persistence API is just loosely coupled with the 
EJB spec so that people can use it even outside of EJB containers.
So putting it outside the ejb namespace makes perfect sense.
Srgjan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org