You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@batchee.apache.org by "Mark Struberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/30 21:20:35 UTC
[jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
Mark Struberg created BATCHEE-6:
-----------------------------------
Summary: JAX-RS requires an Application impl
Key: BATCHEE-6
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATCHEE-6
Project: BatchEE
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Assignee: Mark Struberg
according to the jsr-311 spec we need an Application subclass to be portable across all EE containers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
Re: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
What I meant Mark is it is not enough to be *trully* portable (spec
doesn't mean it works, you know it :p) to have an Application. It
doesn't work in tomcat for instance (even with CXF AFAIK). So IMO the
jira is "we need to provide a war" (which is a good feature IMO).
web-fragment would work but is half of the real feature IMO. Good to
embed but not enough
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/12/2 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> It is _definitly_ mandatory by the JAX-RS spec!
>
>
> Please read the spec bullet I posted in the JIRA.
>
> The way to support both could be to have another module which adds the Application + web-fragment.xml to enable it.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> To: "dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org" <de...@batchee.incubator.apache.org>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Saturday, 30 November 2013, 23:44
>> Subject: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> -1 since it would break a lot of containers (skip user Application,
>> exception, need config...). This is not really mandatory by spec btw, at
>> least not enough alone so either we do everyrhing (see next paragraph) or
>> nothing more IMO.
>>
>> The point is batchee is a part of a end user Application by
>> design...otherwise we should provide a war...and using cxf we dont need it
>> either..
>>
>> ---------- Message transféré ----------
>> De : "Mark Struberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>
>> Date : 30 nov. 2013 21:51
>> Objet : [jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
>> À : <de...@batchee.incubator.apache.org>
>>
>> Mark Struberg created BATCHEE-6:
>> -----------------------------------
>>
>> Summary: JAX-RS requires an Application impl
>> Key: BATCHEE-6
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATCHEE-6
>> Project: BatchEE
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Reporter: Mark Struberg
>> Assignee: Mark Struberg
>>
>>
>> according to the jsr-311 spec we need an Application subclass to be
>> portable across all EE containers.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>> (v6.1#6144)
>>
Re: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
It is _definitly_ mandatory by the JAX-RS spec!
Please read the spec bullet I posted in the JIRA.
The way to support both could be to have another module which adds the Application + web-fragment.xml to enable it.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: "dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org" <de...@batchee.incubator.apache.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, 30 November 2013, 23:44
> Subject: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
>
> Hi
>
> -1 since it would break a lot of containers (skip user Application,
> exception, need config...). This is not really mandatory by spec btw, at
> least not enough alone so either we do everyrhing (see next paragraph) or
> nothing more IMO.
>
> The point is batchee is a part of a end user Application by
> design...otherwise we should provide a war...and using cxf we dont need it
> either..
>
> ---------- Message transféré ----------
> De : "Mark Struberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>
> Date : 30 nov. 2013 21:51
> Objet : [jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
> À : <de...@batchee.incubator.apache.org>
>
> Mark Struberg created BATCHEE-6:
> -----------------------------------
>
> Summary: JAX-RS requires an Application impl
> Key: BATCHEE-6
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATCHEE-6
> Project: BatchEE
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mark Struberg
> Assignee: Mark Struberg
>
>
> according to the jsr-311 spec we need an Application subclass to be
> portable across all EE containers.
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v6.1#6144)
>
Fwd: [jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
-1 since it would break a lot of containers (skip user Application,
exception, need config...). This is not really mandatory by spec btw, at
least not enough alone so either we do everyrhing (see next paragraph) or
nothing more IMO.
The point is batchee is a part of a end user Application by
design...otherwise we should provide a war...and using cxf we dont need it
either..
---------- Message transféré ----------
De : "Mark Struberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>
Date : 30 nov. 2013 21:51
Objet : [jira] [Created] (BATCHEE-6) JAX-RS requires an Application impl
À : <de...@batchee.incubator.apache.org>
Mark Struberg created BATCHEE-6:
-----------------------------------
Summary: JAX-RS requires an Application impl
Key: BATCHEE-6
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATCHEE-6
Project: BatchEE
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Assignee: Mark Struberg
according to the jsr-311 spec we need an Application subclass to be
portable across all EE containers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)