You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by maillist <ma...@emailacs.com> on 2007/03/26 16:54:34 UTC

could someone run these messages....

The only tests that they score for me are BAYES_99, which should be 
enough to get them sent to my spam-drop, but they get to the users 
instead.  When I --lint -D I don't see anything that tells me that I 
have a config problem.

I start spamd this way, as root...

/usr/bin/spamd -r /var/run/spamd.pid \
-d --username=defang --max-spare=5 --min-children=5 --max-children=35

slackware
sendmail 8.14.0
mimedefang 2.61
SpamAssassin version 3.1.8
  running on Perl version 5.8.8

What do you score for these emails?
http://securebackend.net/mail_temp/aubrey.txt (I put 2 messages there)

-=Aubrey=-

Re: could someone run these messages....

Posted by Brian Wilson <wi...@bubba.org>.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, maillist wrote:

>
> The only tests that they score for me are BAYES_99, which should be enough to 
> get them sent to my spam-drop, but they get to the users instead.  When I 
> --lint -D I don't see anything that tells me that I have a config problem.
>
> I start spamd this way, as root...
>
> /usr/bin/spamd -r /var/run/spamd.pid \
> -d --username=defang --max-spare=5 --min-children=5 --max-children=35
>
> slackware
> sendmail 8.14.0
> mimedefang 2.61
> SpamAssassin version 3.1.8
> running on Perl version 5.8.8
>
> What do you score for these emails?
> http://securebackend.net/mail_temp/aubrey.txt (I put 2 messages there)
>
> -=Aubrey=-
>

1st message:

Content analysis details:   (13.1 points, 4.5 required)

  pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  7.0 KAM_6C822ECF           $6c822ecf@ VERY prevalent message-ID header in SPAMs
  4.2 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
  1.9 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL      RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
                             [88.245.62.188 listed in combined.njabl.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                             [88.245.62.188 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]

2nd message:  BAYES_99 only.



AW: could someone run these messages....

Posted by "Starckjohann, Ove" <st...@norddeutsche.de>.
1st:
Inhaltsanalyse im Detail:   (11.2 Punkte, 5.0 benötigt)

Pkte Regelname              Beschreibung
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.7 FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB    Host is d-d-d-d
 0.7 FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D     Host starts with d-d-d-d
 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       "Received"-Kopfzeilen enthalten gefälschte
                            HELO-Identifikation
 2.4 FRT_STRONG1            BODY: ReplaceTags: Strong (1)
  10 OVE_BODY_IS_OUR_LAST_PICK_DOUBLED BODY: OVE_BODY_IS_OUR_LAST_PICK_DO
                            UBLED
-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test: 0-1%
                            [score: 0.0000]



2nd:

Inhaltsanalyse im Detail:   (13.0 Punkte, 5.0 benötigt)

Pkte Regelname              Beschreibung
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.5 FH_RELAY_NODNS         We could not determine your Reverse DNS
  10 FH_MSGID_XXBLAH        Common sign in msg-id's 12/21/2006
 0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test: 40-60%
                            [score: 0.4841]
 2.2 DCC_CHECK              Gelistet im DCC-System
                            (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)


Ove Starckjohann



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: maillist [mailto:maillist@emailacs.com] 
> Gesendet: Montag, 26. März 2007 16:55
> An: users
> Betreff: could someone run these messages....
> 
> 
> 
> The only tests that they score for me are BAYES_99, which should be 
> enough to get them sent to my spam-drop, but they get to the users 
> instead.  When I --lint -D I don't see anything that tells me that I 
> have a config problem.
> 
> I start spamd this way, as root...
> 
> /usr/bin/spamd -r /var/run/spamd.pid \
> -d --username=defang --max-spare=5 --min-children=5 --max-children=35
> 
> slackware
> sendmail 8.14.0
> mimedefang 2.61
> SpamAssassin version 3.1.8
>   running on Perl version 5.8.8
> 
> What do you score for these emails?
> http://securebackend.net/mail_temp/aubrey.txt (I put 2 messages there)
> 
> -=Aubrey=-
> 

AW: could someone run these messages....

Posted by "Starckjohann, Ove" <st...@norddeutsche.de>.
fighting with the same stuff since two days...

i added into my local.cf:

body            OVE_BODY_OUR_LAST_PICK_DOUBLED /\bOur.Last.pick.Doubled\b/i
score           OVE_BODY_OUR_LAST_PICK_DOUBLED 10

because they also got no big score by default...

Ove Starckjohann



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: maillist [mailto:maillist@emailacs.com] 
> Gesendet: Montag, 26. März 2007 16:55
> An: users
> Betreff: could someone run these messages....
> 
> 
> 
> The only tests that they score for me are BAYES_99, which should be 
> enough to get them sent to my spam-drop, but they get to the users 
> instead.  When I --lint -D I don't see anything that tells me that I 
> have a config problem.
> 
> I start spamd this way, as root...
> 
> /usr/bin/spamd -r /var/run/spamd.pid \
> -d --username=defang --max-spare=5 --min-children=5 --max-children=35
> 
> slackware
> sendmail 8.14.0
> mimedefang 2.61
> SpamAssassin version 3.1.8
>   running on Perl version 5.8.8
> 
> What do you score for these emails?
> http://securebackend.net/mail_temp/aubrey.txt (I put 2 messages there)
> 
> -=Aubrey=-
>