You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2008/03/01 22:33:24 UTC

[Bug 5842] Should SPF rules be "tflags net" or not?

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5842





------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org  2008-03-01 13:33 -------
I say yes, they should be tflags net.  it's exactly analogous to the DNSBL
rules; they are network lookups, which can record their results in a header (the
reuse data), which can then be reused in set 0 if --reuse is specified.
IMO that makes sense for the SPF rules (although the recorded results are
put in Received-SPF:).

what do we need to do to record Received-SPF: btw?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.