You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> on 2026/07/01 08:20:33 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-06-26 (rerun)
+1 (binding), checked:
- SVN
- in Docker installation
- Reproducible build
- Licence
- Signature
- Checksums
Best regards,
Wei Lee
Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com> 於 2026年7月1日週三 上午3:00寫道：
> Hey Shahar,
>
> Thanks for amending the files!
> +1 (binding), I have checked SVN, In Docker installation, Reproducible
> package builds, Licence, Signature, Checksums. They look good.
>
> Best regards,
> Bugra Ozturk
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 9:04 PM Shahar Epstein <sh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm rerunning this vote
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/r32knty7pob6fy0wjqccbjwxd7w803xf>
> because
> > the previous RC was incomplete: the required ASF source release artifact
> (
> > apache-airflow-providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz, along with its .asc
> and
> > .sha512 files) was accidentally omitted from the dev distribution
> > directory. The missing artifacts have now been uploaded, so this vote
> > supersedes the previous one.
> >
> > If you have already voted in the previous vote, I'll appreciate if you
> > could vote here as well (PMC - please rerun the entire verification
> process
> > again).
> >
> > I am rerunning the vote for the Airflow Providers packages with release
> > preparation date 2026-06-26. This email is calling a vote on the release,
> > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on 2026-07-02
> > 19:00 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> >
> > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >
> > The packages included in this release, and the main reason for including
> > them, are detailed as follows:
> >
> > - Spark - rc1 was rejected due to an ongoing refactoring effort; that
> > refactor has since been completed.
> > - Kubernetes - bugs introduced by the move to kubernetes client v36 in
> > the last release (10.18.0), fixed in this RC.
> > - Google - bug fix for the same kubernetes client v36 incompatibility;
> > the fix is backward-compatible (works on client v35 and v36).
> > - FAB & Keycloak - revert the airflowctl changes released in the last
> > wave (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/68856). Keycloak
> > additionally includes a fix for missing Keycloak resources being
> > treated as
> > access-denied (#68951).
> > - Celery - adding a worker multiprocessing start-method config to curb
> > the memory regression (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/69015).
> > Part of Airflow 3.3 readiness effort.
> >
> > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2026-06-26
> >
> > *apache-airflow-providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz* is the full source
> > tarball of airflow repo - snapshot taken at the moment of provider's
> > release.
> >
> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the convenience python
> > "sdist" distributions that we publish in PyPI
> >
> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the convenience Python
> > "wheel" distributions that we publish in PyPI.
> >
> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >
> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> > described in:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >
> >
> > Public keys are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >
> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> >
> > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here
> > (unchanged from original vote):
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/69049
> >
> > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> > candidates.
> > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> documentation
> > after the
> > RC candidates are released.
> >
> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.21.0rc1/
> >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.18.1rc2/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/6.2.0rc2/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/3.7.1rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/22.2.1rc1/
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.8.1rc1/
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Shahar Epstein
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-06-26 (rerun)
Posted by Rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com>.
Big thanks to Shahar for recutting this.
+1 (binding) for PMC checks
- SVN
- in Docker installation
- Reproducible build
- Licence
- Signature
- Checksums
Regards,
Rahul Vats
On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 at 20:43, Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
> - Checked SVN
> - Checked reproducible package builds
> - Checked licences
> - Checked signatures
> - Checked SHA512 checks
>
> Checked the md5sum for the source code of spark provider with my
> changes and did some testing around it. Looks great still.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 5:33 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks for re-cutting with the source artifact added. Re-ran the full
> > PMC verification on the rerun RC:
> >
> > - SVN dev folder complete - all 6 providers (wheel + sdist + .asc +
> > .sha512) plus the apache_airflow_providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz
> > trio that was missing before.
> > - SHA512: 13/13 OK.
> > - GPG: 13/13 good signatures, all from your key
> > (DAF549DB1C0B31D8BCE167506834BFD7959CB6D5, in KEYS), including the
> > source tarball.
> > - Reproducible build: 13/13 byte-for-byte identical, rebuilt from tag
> > providers/2026-06-26 - both the source tarball and all 12 provider
> > wheels/sdists.
> > - RAT (apache-rat 0.18) on the unpacked source: 0 Unapproved, 0 Unknown.
> >
> > The source tarball reproduces byte-identical, so this clears my -1
> > from the original vote.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-06-26 (rerun)
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@apache.org>.
+1 binding.
- Checked SVN
- Checked reproducible package builds
- Checked licences
- Checked signatures
- Checked SHA512 checks
Checked the md5sum for the source code of spark provider with my
changes and did some testing around it. Looks great still.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 5:33 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for re-cutting with the source artifact added. Re-ran the full
> PMC verification on the rerun RC:
>
> - SVN dev folder complete - all 6 providers (wheel + sdist + .asc +
> .sha512) plus the apache_airflow_providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz
> trio that was missing before.
> - SHA512: 13/13 OK.
> - GPG: 13/13 good signatures, all from your key
> (DAF549DB1C0B31D8BCE167506834BFD7959CB6D5, in KEYS), including the
> source tarball.
> - Reproducible build: 13/13 byte-for-byte identical, rebuilt from tag
> providers/2026-06-26 - both the source tarball and all 12 provider
> wheels/sdists.
> - RAT (apache-rat 0.18) on the unpacked source: 0 Unapproved, 0 Unknown.
>
> The source tarball reproduces byte-identical, so this clears my -1
> from the original vote.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-06-26 (rerun)
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks for re-cutting with the source artifact added. Re-ran the full
PMC verification on the rerun RC:
- SVN dev folder complete - all 6 providers (wheel + sdist + .asc +
.sha512) plus the apache_airflow_providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz
trio that was missing before.
- SHA512: 13/13 OK.
- GPG: 13/13 good signatures, all from your key
(DAF549DB1C0B31D8BCE167506834BFD7959CB6D5, in KEYS), including the
source tarball.
- Reproducible build: 13/13 byte-for-byte identical, rebuilt from tag
providers/2026-06-26 - both the source tarball and all 12 provider
wheels/sdists.
- RAT (apache-rat 0.18) on the unpacked source: 0 Unapproved, 0 Unknown.
The source tarball reproduces byte-identical, so this clears my -1
from the original vote.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-06-26 (rerun)
Posted by Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>.
+1 (binding)
I have checked,
- SVN
- Reproducible package builds
- Licence
- Signature
- Checksums
Best regards,
Hussein Awala
On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 10:22 AM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding), checked:
>
> - SVN
> - in Docker installation
> - Reproducible build
> - Licence
> - Signature
> - Checksums
>
> Best regards,
> Wei Lee
>
> Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com> 於 2026年7月1日週三 上午3:00寫道：
>
> > Hey Shahar,
> >
> > Thanks for amending the files!
> > +1 (binding), I have checked SVN, In Docker installation, Reproducible
> > package builds, Licence, Signature, Checksums. They look good.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bugra Ozturk
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 9:04 PM Shahar Epstein <sh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I'm rerunning this vote
> > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/r32knty7pob6fy0wjqccbjwxd7w803xf>
> > because
> > > the previous RC was incomplete: the required ASF source release
> artifact
> > (
> > > apache-airflow-providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz, along with its .asc
> > and
> > > .sha512 files) was accidentally omitted from the dev distribution
> > > directory. The missing artifacts have now been uploaded, so this vote
> > > supersedes the previous one.
> > >
> > > If you have already voted in the previous vote, I'll appreciate if you
> > > could vote here as well (PMC - please rerun the entire verification
> > process
> > > again).
> > >
> > > I am rerunning the vote for the Airflow Providers packages with release
> > > preparation date 2026-06-26. This email is calling a vote on the
> release,
> > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on
> 2026-07-02
> > > 19:00 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> > >
> > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >
> > > The packages included in this release, and the main reason for
> including
> > > them, are detailed as follows:
> > >
> > > - Spark - rc1 was rejected due to an ongoing refactoring effort;
> that
> > > refactor has since been completed.
> > > - Kubernetes - bugs introduced by the move to kubernetes client v36
> in
> > > the last release (10.18.0), fixed in this RC.
> > > - Google - bug fix for the same kubernetes client v36
> incompatibility;
> > > the fix is backward-compatible (works on client v35 and v36).
> > > - FAB & Keycloak - revert the airflowctl changes released in the
> last
> > > wave (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/68856). Keycloak
> > > additionally includes a fix for missing Keycloak resources being
> > > treated as
> > > access-denied (#68951).
> > > - Celery - adding a worker multiprocessing start-method config to
> curb
> > > the memory regression (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/69015
> ).
> > > Part of Airflow 3.3 readiness effort.
> > >
> > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2026-06-26
> > >
> > > *apache-airflow-providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz* is the full source
> > > tarball of airflow repo - snapshot taken at the moment of provider's
> > > release.
> > >
> > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the convenience
> python
> > > "sdist" distributions that we publish in PyPI
> > >
> > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the convenience Python
> > > "wheel" distributions that we publish in PyPI.
> > >
> > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >
> > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> is
> > > described in:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >
> > >
> > > Public keys are available at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> are
> > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >
> > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> > >
> > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here
> > > (unchanged from original vote):
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/69049
> > >
> > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> RC
> > > candidates.
> > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > documentation
> > > after the
> > > RC candidates are released.
> > >
> > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > >
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.21.0rc1/
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.18.1rc2/
> > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/6.2.0rc2/
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/3.7.1rc1/
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/22.2.1rc1/
> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.8.1rc1/
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Shahar Epstein
> > >
> >
>