[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-9316) Analyse and improve code coverage in ML module (follow-up to IGNITE-9146)

["Oleg Ignatenko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16584862#comment-16584862 ] 

Oleg Ignatenko commented on IGNITE-9316:
----------------------------------------

improved tests are in branch https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite_9316

> Analyse and improve code coverage in ML module (follow-up to IGNITE-9146)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-9316
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9316
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: ml
>    Affects Versions: 2.6
>            Reporter: Oleg Ignatenko
>            Assignee: Oleg Ignatenko
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: unit-test
>             Fix For: 2.7
>
>
> Studying of coverage reports attached in IGNITE-9146 suggests that many default methods in interfaces are not covered by tests.
> In particular the default methods in the following interfaces look like worth covering in tests: 
> {noformat}
> org.apache.ignite.ml.Model
> org.apache.ignite.ml.math.functions.IgniteTriFunction
> org.apache.ignite.ml.dataset.PartitionDataBuilder
> org.apache.ignite.ml.dataset.PartitionContextBuilder
> org.apache.ignite.ml.dataset.Dataset
> org.apache.ignite.ml.environment.parallelism.Promise
> org.apache.ignite.ml.composition.predictionsaggregator.PredictionsAggregator{noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)