You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2006/09/23 23:50:22 UTC
[VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
[ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
[ ] 0 Don't know or care
[ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new snapshots
are posted here:
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote
attempt:
* Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
* Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I copied
the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does not list
third party licenses text, but mentions all included dependencies and
their web sites).
* Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
binary form).
* Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
* Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
Please review the new files and cast your vote.
(And here is my +1)
Andrus
On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
> 2.0.1-incubating release.
>
> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
>
> * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
> Cayenne 1.2.1.
> * the release has no known IP issues
> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license dependencies
> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
>
> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it
> out for the Incubator PMC vote.
>
> Thanks
> Andrus
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new snapshots
> are posted here:
>
+1.
--
Kevin
Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Ok, we can close the vote now. We have 6 "+1" (3 of them are from
PPMC members), and no other votes. Here is a breakdown:
Andrus Adamchik +1
Michael Gentry +1
Tore Halset +1
Mike Kienenberger +1
Kevin Menard +1
Jim Jagielski +1 (cast on the PPMC list)
I will start the vote on the general@i.a.o shortly.
Andrus
On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new
> snapshots are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>
> These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote
> attempt:
>
> * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
> * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I
> copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does
> not list third party licenses text, but mentions all included
> dependencies and their web sites).
> * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
> binary form).
> * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
> * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
>
> Please review the new files and cast your vote.
>
> (And here is my +1)
>
> Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Looks like you've hit everything I normally see pinged by the
Incubator PMC. Great work! I'm hoping we're the first project to
clear a release the first try :-)
[x] +1 Go ahead with the release
On 9/23/06, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new snapshots
> are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>
> These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote
> attempt:
>
> * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
> * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I copied
> the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does not list
> third party licenses text, but mentions all included dependencies and
> their web sites).
> * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
> binary form).
> * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
> * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
>
> Please review the new files and cast your vote.
>
> (And here is my +1)
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
> > 2.0.1-incubating release.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> > [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> > [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
> >
> >
> >
> > * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
> > * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
> > Cayenne 1.2.1.
> > * the release has no known IP issues
> > * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license dependencies
> > * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
> > DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
> >
> > Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it
> > out for the Incubator PMC vote.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Andrus
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Posted by Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>.
Still +1
- Tore.
On Sep 23, 2006, at 23:50, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new
> snapshots are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>
> These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote
> attempt:
>
> * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
> * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I
> copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does
> not list third party licenses text, but mentions all included
> dependencies and their web sites).
> * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
> binary form).
> * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
> * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
>
> Please review the new files and cast your vote.
>
> (And here is my +1)
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
>> 2.0.1-incubating release.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
>> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>>
>>
>>
>> * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
>> Cayenne 1.2.1.
>> * the release has no known IP issues
>> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license
>> dependencies
>> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
>> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
>>
>> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it
>> out for the Incubator PMC vote.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Sep 25, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> Are we going to wait until Bill gets back from vacation to
> get his vote?
No if we get 3 PPMC votes on that. Jean is on vacation this week as
well though...
Andrus
Re: Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
I am still +1 to a release. If we discover other problems, we'll fix
them (part of the purpose of incubation, right?). I think we are in
pretty good shape overall, but I haven't the time to do a thorough
review. Are we going to wait until Bill gets back from vacation to
get his vote?
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 9/23/06, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> The last problem is fixed and new files are uploaded, sorry for the
> mixup.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > Wait a sec - found a last minute problem - third-party licenses
> > must go in the LICENSE file underneath Apache license. Fixing this
> > now...
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >
> >> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> >> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> >> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new
> >> snapshots are posted here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
> >>
> >> These issues were addressed following comments after the first
> >> vote attempt:
> >>
> >> * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
> >> * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I
> >> copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does
> >> not list third party licenses text, but mentions all included
> >> dependencies and their web sites).
> >> * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
> >> binary form).
> >> * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
> >> * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
> >>
> >> Please review the new files and cast your vote.
> >>
> >> (And here is my +1)
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>
> >>> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
> >>> 2.0.1-incubating release.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> >>> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> >>> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
> >>> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
> >>> Cayenne 1.2.1.
> >>> * the release has no known IP issues
> >>> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license
> >>> dependencies
> >>> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
> >>> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
> >>>
> >>> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send
> >>> it out for the Incubator PMC vote.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
The last problem is fixed and new files are uploaded, sorry for the
mixup.
Andrus
On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Wait a sec - found a last minute problem - third-party licenses
> must go in the LICENSE file underneath Apache license. Fixing this
> now...
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
>> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>>
>>
>> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new
>> snapshots are posted here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>>
>> These issues were addressed following comments after the first
>> vote attempt:
>>
>> * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
>> * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I
>> copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does
>> not list third party licenses text, but mentions all included
>> dependencies and their web sites).
>> * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
>> binary form).
>> * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
>> * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
>>
>> Please review the new files and cast your vote.
>>
>> (And here is my +1)
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
>>> 2.0.1-incubating release.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
>>> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>>> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
>>> Cayenne 1.2.1.
>>> * the release has no known IP issues
>>> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license
>>> dependencies
>>> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
>>> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
>>>
>>> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send
>>> it out for the Incubator PMC vote.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Take 2 - Cayenne 2.0.1-incubating release
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Wait a sec - found a last minute problem - third-party licenses must
go in the LICENSE file underneath Apache license. Fixing this now...
Andrus
On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>
>
> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new
> snapshots are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>
> These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote
> attempt:
>
> * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
> * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I
> copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does
> not list third party licenses text, but mentions all included
> dependencies and their web sites).
> * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
> binary form).
> * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
> * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
>
> Please review the new files and cast your vote.
>
> (And here is my +1)
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
>> 2.0.1-incubating release.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't know or care
>> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
>>
>>
>>
>> * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
>> Cayenne 1.2.1.
>> * the release has no known IP issues
>> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license
>> dependencies
>> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
>> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
>>
>> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it
>> out for the Incubator PMC vote.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>
>