You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by "Stefan Betermieux (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org> on 2006/02/28 19:00:39 UTC

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-162) Tree2: TreeWalker interface should be public

Tree2: TreeWalker interface should be public
--------------------------------------------

         Key: TOMAHAWK-162
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-162
     Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
        Type: Bug
  Components: Tree2  
    Versions: 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT    
    Reporter: Stefan Betermieux


The visisibilty of the TreeWalker interface should be public and not package. Or is there a good reason to forbid applications access to the more general TreeWalker interface but permit public access to TreeWalkerBase?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] Resolved: (TOMAHAWK-162) Tree2: TreeWalker interface should be public

Posted by "sean schofield (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-162?page=all ]
     
sean schofield resolved TOMAHAWK-162:
-------------------------------------

    Fix Version: 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT
     Resolution: Fixed

I can't remember if there was a reason for this interface to not be public.  After looking at the code I can't think of a good reason why it should not be public so I fixed it for you.

> Tree2: TreeWalker interface should be public
> --------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: TOMAHAWK-162
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-162
>      Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Tree2
>     Versions: 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT
>     Reporter: Stefan Betermieux
>      Fix For: 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT

>
> The visisibilty of the TreeWalker interface should be public and not package. Or is there a good reason to forbid applications access to the more general TreeWalker interface but permit public access to TreeWalkerBase?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira