You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/11/01 23:07:18 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-748) "Maven Site" fails so can't
generate javadoc, and not available on DS website either
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-748?page=all ]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSERVER-748.
-----------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny
Fixed, applying Norval patch and fixing waring on trunks.
> "Maven Site" fails so can't generate javadoc, and not available on DS website either
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSERVER-748
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-748
> Project: Directory ApacheDS
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 1.0
> Environment: JDK 1.5.06, Maven 2.0.4
> Reporter: Norval Hope
> Assigned To: Emmanuel Lecharny
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ad_1.0_remove_bad_javadoc_links.patch, ad_1.1_remove_bad_javadoc_links.patch
>
>
> "Maven site" on a virgin 1.0 branch gives this exception:
> C:/src/ad_branch_1.0/shared/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/
> exception/LdapAuthenticationException.java:38: warning - Tag @link: reference no
> t found: ResultCodeEnum.INVALIDCREDENTIALS
> java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find resource for bundle com.sun.tools
> .doclets.formats.html.resources.standard, key doclet.malformed_html_link_tag
> at java.util.ResourceBundle.getObject(ResourceBundle.java:325)
> at java.util.ResourceBundle.getString(ResourceBundle.java:285)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.util.MessageRetriever.getText(
> MessageRetriever.java:114)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.util.MessageRetriever.getText(
> MessageRetriever.java:92)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.util.MessageRetriever.getText(
> MessageRetriever.java:81)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.util.MessageRetriever.warning(
> MessageRetriever.java:290)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.HtmlDocletWriter.redirectRelativeL
> inks(HtmlDocletWriter.java:1526)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.HtmlDocletWriter.commentTagsToStri
> ng(HtmlDocletWriter.java:1438)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.HtmlDocletWriter.printCommentTags(
> HtmlDocletWriter.java:1397)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.HtmlDocletWriter.printSummaryComme
> nt(HtmlDocletWriter.java:1370)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.HtmlDocletWriter.printSummaryComme
> nt(HtmlDocletWriter.java:1366)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.AbstractIndexWriter.printComment(A
> bstractIndexWriter.java:192)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.AbstractIndexWriter.printDescripti
> on(AbstractIndexWriter.java:164)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.AbstractIndexWriter.generateConten
> ts(AbstractIndexWriter.java:89)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.SingleIndexWriter.generateIndexFil
> e(SingleIndexWriter.java:76)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.SingleIndexWriter.generate(SingleI
> ndexWriter.java:52)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.HtmlDoclet.generateOtherFiles(Html
> Doclet.java:103)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.AbstractDoclet.startGeneration
> (AbstractDoclet.java:122)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.AbstractDoclet.start(AbstractD
> oclet.java:64)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.formats.html.HtmlDoclet.start(HtmlDoclet.java:4
> 2)
> at com.sun.tools.doclets.standard.Standard.start(Standard.java:23)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.
> java:39)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
> sorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> at com.sun.tools.javadoc.DocletInvoker.invoke(DocletInvoker.java:269)
> at com.sun.tools.javadoc.DocletInvoker.start(DocletInvoker.java:143)
> at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Start.parseAndExecute(Start.java:340)
> at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Start.begin(Start.java:128)
> at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Main.execute(Main.java:41)
> at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Main.main(Main.java:31)
> Fixed one instance of this problem in GracefulShutdownResponse:35 (illegal @see instead of @link in javadoc comment) but just failed again further on and can't tell which particular warning is to blame this time. Seems like a maven config problem to my untrained eye, which I'm afraid means I don't know how to approach debugging it.
> Marked as "critical" as I presume it is a "must fix" prior to the 1.0 release.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-748) "Maven Site" fails so can't generate javadoc, and not available on DS website either
Posted by Norval Hope <nr...@gmail.com>.
Ok, thanks.
My primary objective was just getting any javadoc generated, so
ignored the 200+ warnings and just fixed the fatal errors. Thanks for
going one step further.
As an aside, once I ran "mvn site" I noticed the top-level page had
broken links as it seemed to assume that the javadocs from all the
sub-project targets had been copied underneath the top-level target/
dir. Is there a step missing from the MOJO or something?
Thanks
Re: [jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-748) "Maven Site" fails so can't
generate javadoc, and not available on DS website either
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Norval Hope a écrit :
> On reading your earlier email, perhaps you patched 1.0 but not 1.1, or
> did you mean both had been pacthed?
Both are patched ... Took time, especially to remove a lot of waring in
shared/ldap !!!
Emmanuel
Re: [jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-748) "Maven Site" fails so can't generate javadoc, and not available on DS website either
Posted by Norval Hope <nr...@gmail.com>.
On reading your earlier email, perhaps you patched 1.0 but not 1.1, or
did you mean both had been pacthed?
On 11/2/06, Norval Hope <nr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Shouldn't the patch for 1.0.x be applied too?
>
> Thanks
>
Re: [jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-748) "Maven Site" fails so can't generate javadoc, and not available on DS website either
Posted by Norval Hope <nr...@gmail.com>.
Hi Emmanuel,
Shouldn't the patch for 1.0.x be applied too?
Thanks