You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2014/03/26 20:25:55 UTC
[VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are also
available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new blocker.
Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
-0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Anoop John <an...@gmail.com>.
If RC3 comes I would like to include HBASE-10860 also in it.
-Anoop-
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
> with cell visibility labels.
> Namely:
> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
> visibility label in secure deployment
> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
> in secure deployment
>
> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
> labels due to mismatching username.
>
> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
> principals.
>
> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
> work in secure deployment.
>
> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > - checked documentation and tarball
> >
> > - Ran unit test suite which passed
> >
> > - Ran in local and distributed mode
> > - checked the UI pages
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
> >>
> >> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
> >>
> >> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
> >> 0.98.1
> >> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
> >> "Comparsion
> >> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
> >> to
> >> this RC.
> >>
> >> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but
> this
> >> test only problem can be fixed later.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
> >> at
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> >> > also available in the temporary repository
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
> >> >
> >> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >> >
> >> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
> >> > blocker.
> >> >
> >> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> >> > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
> >> as
> >> > 0.98.1.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best regards,
> >> >
> >> > - Andy
> >> >
> >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >> > (via Tom White)
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> >> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Ok, RC3 coming up by tomorrow.
> On Mar 29, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
> With HBASE-10863, I change my vote to -1
>
> Thanks
>
>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ted, is that a -1?
>>
>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1
>>>
>>> W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some flexibility.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6?
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will be better served by waiting.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from .1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
>>>>> with cell visibility labels.
>>>>> Namely:
>>>>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
>>>>> visibility label in secure deployment
>>>>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
>>>>> in secure deployment
>>>>>
>>>>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
>>>>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
>>>>> labels due to mismatching username.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
>>>>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
>>>>> principals.
>>>>>
>>>>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
>>>>> work in secure deployment.
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
>>>>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - checked documentation and tarball
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode
>>>>>> - checked the UI pages
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
>>>>>>> 0.98.1
>>>>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>>>>>>> "Comparsion
>>>>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> this RC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
>>>>>>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>>>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
>>>>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>>>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Yes.
With HBASE-10863, I change my vote to -1
Thanks
On Mar 29, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ted, is that a -1?
>
>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1
>>
>> W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some flexibility.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6?
>>>
>>> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will be better served by waiting.
>>>
>>> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from .1.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
>>>> with cell visibility labels.
>>>> Namely:
>>>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
>>>> visibility label in secure deployment
>>>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
>>>> in secure deployment
>>>>
>>>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
>>>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
>>>> labels due to mismatching username.
>>>>
>>>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
>>>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
>>>> principals.
>>>>
>>>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
>>>> work in secure deployment.
>>>>
>>>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
>>>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> - checked documentation and tarball
>>>>>
>>>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>>>>>
>>>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode
>>>>> - checked the UI pages
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
>>>>>> 0.98.1
>>>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>>>>>> "Comparsion
>>>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> this RC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
>>>>>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
>>>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
Ted, is that a -1?
> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1
>
> W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some flexibility.
>
> Cheers
>
>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6?
>>
>> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will be better served by waiting.
>>
>> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from .1.
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
>>> with cell visibility labels.
>>> Namely:
>>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
>>> visibility label in secure deployment
>>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
>>> in secure deployment
>>>
>>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
>>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
>>> labels due to mismatching username.
>>>
>>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
>>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
>>> principals.
>>>
>>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
>>> work in secure deployment.
>>>
>>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
>>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> - checked documentation and tarball
>>>>
>>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>>>>
>>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode
>>>> - checked the UI pages
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>>>>>
>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
>>>>> 0.98.1
>>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>>>>> "Comparsion
>>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
>>>>> to
>>>>> this RC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
>>>>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>>>>> at
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
>>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
>>>>> as
>>>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>
>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1
W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some flexibility.
Cheers
On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6?
>
> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will be better served by waiting.
>
> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from .1.
>
>
>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
>> with cell visibility labels.
>> Namely:
>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
>> visibility label in secure deployment
>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
>> in secure deployment
>>
>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
>> labels due to mismatching username.
>>
>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
>> principals.
>>
>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
>> work in secure deployment.
>>
>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> - checked documentation and tarball
>>>
>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>>>
>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode
>>> - checked the UI pages
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>>>
>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>>>>
>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
>>>> 0.98.1
>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>>>> "Comparsion
>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
>>>> to
>>>> this RC.
>>>>
>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
>>>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>>>> at
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>
>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
>>>> as
>>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>
>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6?
I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will be better served by waiting.
Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from .1.
> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
> with cell visibility labels.
> Namely:
> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
> visibility label in secure deployment
> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
> in secure deployment
>
> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
> labels due to mismatching username.
>
> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
> principals.
>
> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
> work in secure deployment.
>
> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> - checked documentation and tarball
>>
>> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>>
>> - Ran in local and distributed mode
>> - checked the UI pages
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>>
>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>>>
>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
>>> 0.98.1
>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>>> "Comparsion
>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
>>> to
>>> this RC.
>>>
>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
>>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>>> at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>>>>
>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>
>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
>>>> blocker.
>>>>
>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
>>> as
>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> - Andy
>>>
>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>> (via Tom White)
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
with cell visibility labels.
Namely:
HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
visibility label in secure deployment
HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
in secure deployment
Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
labels due to mismatching username.
The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
principals.
>From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
work in secure deployment.
I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
Cheers
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> - checked documentation and tarball
>
> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>
> - Ran in local and distributed mode
> - checked the UI pages
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>
>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>>
>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
>> 0.98.1
>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>> "Comparsion
>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
>> to
>> this RC.
>>
>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>> at
>> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
>> > also available in the temporary repository
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>> >
>> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>> >
>> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>> >
>> >
>> > This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
>> > blocker.
>> >
>> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>> > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
>> as
>> > 0.98.1.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > - Andy
>> >
>> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> > (via Tom White)
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
+1
- checked documentation and tarball
- Ran unit test suite which passed
- Ran in local and distributed mode
- checked the UI pages
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>
> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>
> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and 0.98.1
> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
> "Comparsion
> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant to
> this RC.
>
> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
> test only problem can be fixed later.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> > also available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> >
> >
> > This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
> > blocker.
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> > 0.98.1.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1
Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and 0.98.1
indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled "Comparsion
between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant to
this RC.
Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
test only problem can be fixed later.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> also available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>
>
> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
> blocker.
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.1.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
I've been running the it tests on have been having failures with
IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, IntegrationTestIngest. I've been digging
into ITBLL -- I likely have some sort of MR config problems.
ITLoadAndVerify, ImportTsv, ManyRegions, Bulkload, and Mttr are passing
consistently.
For the tests I'm running, it is the same story for the 0.96 branch and
trunk branch.
Jon
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> Downloaded -hadoop2 version, checked hash, checked layout and doc (I like
> the way it has hbasecon logo in there), started it up, loaded in a few
> million rows of data and verified it there afterward operating in local
> mode.
>
> Next tried on small cluster (tip of hadoop 2.4 branch).
> Ran test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList a few times. As long as I cleared
> the table between runs, all passed.
>
> Other IntegrationTests seem broke but not related to this RC in particular
> (not finding files though they seem to be there -- e.g. load csv).
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> also
> > available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> >
> >
> > This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
> blocker.
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00
> > -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.1.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
I've been running the it tests on have been having failures with
IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, IntegrationTestIngest. I've been digging
into ITBLL -- I likely have some sort of MR config problems.
ITLoadAndVerify, ImportTsv, ManyRegions, Bulkload, and Mttr are passing
consistently.
For the tests I'm running, it is the same story for the 0.96 branch and
trunk branch.
Jon
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> Downloaded -hadoop2 version, checked hash, checked layout and doc (I like
> the way it has hbasecon logo in there), started it up, loaded in a few
> million rows of data and verified it there afterward operating in local
> mode.
>
> Next tried on small cluster (tip of hadoop 2.4 branch).
> Ran test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList a few times. As long as I cleared
> the table between runs, all passed.
>
> Other IntegrationTests seem broke but not related to this RC in particular
> (not finding files though they seem to be there -- e.g. load csv).
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> also
> > available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> >
> >
> > This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
> blocker.
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00
> > -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.1.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
Downloaded -hadoop2 version, checked hash, checked layout and doc (I like
the way it has hbasecon logo in there), started it up, loaded in a few
million rows of data and verified it there afterward operating in local
mode.
Next tried on small cluster (tip of hadoop 2.4 branch).
Ran test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList a few times. As long as I cleared
the table between runs, all passed.
Other IntegrationTests seem broke but not related to this RC in particular
(not finding files though they seem to be there -- e.g. load csv).
St.Ack
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are also
> available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>
>
> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new blocker.
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
> -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
Downloaded -hadoop2 version, checked hash, checked layout and doc (I like
the way it has hbasecon logo in there), started it up, loaded in a few
million rows of data and verified it there afterward operating in local
mode.
Next tried on small cluster (tip of hadoop 2.4 branch).
Ran test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList a few times. As long as I cleared
the table between runs, all passed.
Other IntegrationTests seem broke but not related to this RC in particular
(not finding files though they seem to be there -- e.g. load csv).
St.Ack
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are also
> available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>
>
> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new blocker.
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
> -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Posted by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>.
+1
- downloaded the -hadoop2 and -src tarballs
- inspected both tarballs, the documentation, CHANGES.txt, etc
- installed in local and distributed mode (with Hadoop 2.2.0)
- in both local and distributed mode, inserted some rows, flushed, compacted, scanned, etc
- spot checked the UI pages
It all checked out.
-- Lars
________________________________
From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org>
Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" <us...@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 12:25 PM
Subject: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are also
available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new blocker.
Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
-0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1
Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and 0.98.1
indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled "Comparsion
between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant to
this RC.
Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this
test only problem can be fixed later.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are
> also available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>
>
> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
> blocker.
>
> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.1.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Posted by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>.
+1
- downloaded the -hadoop2 and -src tarballs
- inspected both tarballs, the documentation, CHANGES.txt, etc
- installed in local and distributed mode (with Hadoop 2.2.0)
- in both local and distributed mode, inserted some rows, flushed, compacted, scanned, etc
- spot checked the UI pages
It all checked out.
-- Lars
________________________________
From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org>
Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" <us...@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 12:25 PM
Subject: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download at
http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are also
available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new blocker.
Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00
-0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)