You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to regexp-dev@jakarta.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/09/09 00:41:42 UTC
[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 377]
Convert regexp test suite to JUnit BugRat Report#667
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=377
*** shadow/377 Sun May 20 17:20:02 2001
--- shadow/377.tmp.3178 Sat Sep 8 15:41:42 2001
***************
*** 1,19 ****
! Bug#: 377
! Product: Regexp
! Version: unspecified
! Platform: All
! OS/Version: All
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
! Severity: Enhancement
! Priority: High
! Component: Other
! AssignedTo: regexp-dev@jakarta.apache.org
! ReportedBy: pholser@mindspring.com
! URL:
! Cc:
! Summary: Convert regexp test suite to JUnit BugRat Report#667
!
i believe converting the regexp test suite to use the
free JUnit framework is a good precedent to set; my
experience has been that it actually encourages the
--- 1,19 ----
! +============================================================================+
! | Convert regexp test suite to JUnit BugRat Report#667 |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | Bug #: 377 Product: Regexp |
! | Status: ASSIGNED Version: unspecified |
! | Resolution: Platform: All |
! | Severity: Enhancement OS/Version: All |
! | Priority: High Component: Other |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | Assigned To: regexp-dev@jakarta.apache.org |
! | Reported By: pholser@mindspring.com |
! | CC list: Cc: |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | URL: |
! +============================================================================+
! | DESCRIPTION |
i believe converting the regexp test suite to use the
free JUnit framework is a good precedent to set; my
experience has been that it actually encourages the
***************
*** 21,23 ****
--- 21,27 ----
an initial stab at this, and it seems pretty good--though
i've tweaked the RETest.txt file somewhat. i'd be happy
to share my findings if desired.
+
+ ------- Additional Comments From gholam@xtra.co.nz 2001-09-08 15:41 -------
+ I have the treaks from Paul (thanks) sitting around somewhere.
+ I will have a stab at integrating them.