You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@zookeeper.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/03/25 11:29:12 UTC
[GitHub] [zookeeper] arshadmohammad opened a new pull request #1654: ZOOKEEPER-3887: In SSL-only server zkServer.sh status command should use secureClientPortAddress instead of clientPortAddress
arshadmohammad opened a new pull request #1654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1654
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [zookeeper] asfgit closed pull request #1654: ZOOKEEPER-3887: In SSL-only server zkServer.sh status command should use secureClientPortAddress instead of clientPortAddress
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
asfgit closed pull request #1654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1654
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [zookeeper] anmolnar commented on pull request #1654: ZOOKEEPER-3887: In SSL-only server zkServer.sh status command should use secureClientPortAddress instead of clientPortAddress
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
anmolnar commented on pull request #1654:
URL: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1654#issuecomment-808797937
Good catch. I didn't know about the `secureClientPortAddress` option and noticed because it's still not documented. Ouch!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org