You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Christoph Emmersberger <ce...@gmail.com> on 2014/06/17 09:03:59 UTC

Request for Contribution: Camel-Extra ASF 2.0 Compliant Components

Hi,
I’ve done some checking regarding licenses of Camel-Extra components and figured, that we are currently not using any direct dependencies of any non ASF compliant licenses within the following components:

camel-couchbase
Couchbase itself remains under a proprietary and enterprise license, the client we are using is under the ASF2.0 license
 
camel-spring-neo4j 
Neo4J server remains to be under the GNU GPL, however the libraries that we are using to connect to the server instance are maintained under ASF 2.0

camel-zeromq 
zeromq is licensed unde LGPLv3+, however the connecting libraries are ASF 2.0.

Therefore, I kindly ask you to consider a migration of these three components into
You’ll find further, more detailed information on the Camel-Extra mailing list [1].

Please get back with some advice regarding the contribution of the listed components to ASF Camel.

Kind regards,

Christoph

[1] http://camel-extra.1091541.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-Extra-Licenses-td332.html

Re: Request for Contribution: Camel-Extra ASF 2.0 Compliant Components

Posted by Christoph Emmersberger <ce...@gmail.com>.

Thanks for the invitation!

My original question was intended to get some feedback about the transfer of existing Camel-Extra components [1] since I could not find any direct license dependency to a non ASF 2.0 compliant version.
Camel-Extra is an affiliated project of ASF camel, hosting several components that can not be maintained under the ASF umbrella due to license issues.

So the question is, if you see any legal issues with transferring the components. If not, I’d be happy to file JIRA tickets to get kick the process off.

Kind regards,

Christoph

[1] https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/?redir=1

On 17 Jun 2014, at 15:25, kraythe . <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Contributions are welcome. You know the technologies and writing a
> component isn't that hard. ;)
> 
> *Robert Simmons Jr. MSc. - Lead Java Architect @ EA*
> *Author of: Maintainable Java (Kindle
> <http://www.amazon.com/Maintainable-Java-Robert-Simmons-Jr-ebook/dp/B00AKHI69K>)(iTunes
> <https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/maintainable-java/id585666097?mt=11>)*
> *LinkedIn: **http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-simmons/40/852/a39
> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-simmons/40/852/a39>*
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Christoph Emmersberger <ce...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> I’ve done some checking regarding licenses of Camel-Extra components and
>> figured, that we are currently not using any direct dependencies of any non
>> ASF compliant licenses within the following components:
>> 
>> camel-couchbase
>> Couchbase itself remains under a proprietary and enterprise license, the
>> client we are using is under the ASF2.0 license
>> 
>> camel-spring-neo4j
>> Neo4J server remains to be under the GNU GPL, however the libraries that
>> we are using to connect to the server instance are maintained under ASF 2.0
>> 
>> camel-zeromq
>> zeromq is licensed unde LGPLv3+, however the connecting libraries are ASF
>> 2.0.
>> 
>> Therefore, I kindly ask you to consider a migration of these three
>> components into
>> You’ll find further, more detailed information on the Camel-Extra mailing
>> list [1].
>> 
>> Please get back with some advice regarding the contribution of the listed
>> components to ASF Camel.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Christoph
>> 
>> [1]
>> http://camel-extra.1091541.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-Extra-Licenses-td332.html
>> 
>>

Re: Request for Contribution: Camel-Extra ASF 2.0 Compliant Components

Posted by "kraythe ." <kr...@gmail.com>.

Contributions are welcome. You know the technologies and writing a
component isn't that hard. ;)

*Robert Simmons Jr. MSc. - Lead Java Architect @ EA*
*Author of: Maintainable Java (Kindle
<http://www.amazon.com/Maintainable-Java-Robert-Simmons-Jr-ebook/dp/B00AKHI69K>)(iTunes
<https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/maintainable-java/id585666097?mt=11>)*
*LinkedIn: **http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-simmons/40/852/a39
<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-simmons/40/852/a39>*

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Christoph Emmersberger <ce...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> I’ve done some checking regarding licenses of Camel-Extra components and
> figured, that we are currently not using any direct dependencies of any non
> ASF compliant licenses within the following components:
>
> camel-couchbase
> Couchbase itself remains under a proprietary and enterprise license, the
> client we are using is under the ASF2.0 license
>
> camel-spring-neo4j
> Neo4J server remains to be under the GNU GPL, however the libraries that
> we are using to connect to the server instance are maintained under ASF 2.0
>
> camel-zeromq
> zeromq is licensed unde LGPLv3+, however the connecting libraries are ASF
> 2.0.
>
> Therefore, I kindly ask you to consider a migration of these three
> components into
> You’ll find further, more detailed information on the Camel-Extra mailing
> list [1].
>
> Please get back with some advice regarding the contribution of the listed
> components to ASF Camel.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Christoph
>
> [1]
> http://camel-extra.1091541.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-Extra-Licenses-td332.html
>
>