[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-6940) FairScheduler: Enable Container update CodePaths and container resize testcase

["Haibo Chen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16227519#comment-16227519 ] 

Haibo Chen edited comment on YARN-6940 at 10/31/17 8:48 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

[~asuresh] A quick question. If we only do node-local container update (we reject container allocations on a different node than the original node), what is the reason to set relaxLocality to true in the first place?


was (Author: haibochen):
[~asuresh] A quick question. If we only do node-local container update (we reject container allocations on a different node than the original node), what is the reason to set relaxLocality to true in the first case?

> FairScheduler: Enable Container update CodePaths and container resize testcase
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6940
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6940
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: fairscheduler
>            Reporter: Arun Suresh
>            Assignee: Arun Suresh
>         Attachments: YARN-6940.001.patch
>
>
> After YARN-6216, the Container Update (which includes Resource increase and decrease) code-paths are mostly scheduler agnostic.
> This JIRA tracks the final minor change needed in the FairScheduler. It also re-enables the {{TestAMRMClient#testAMRMClientWithContainerResourceChange}} test for the FairScheduler - which verifies that it works for the FairScheduler.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org