You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pluto-dev@portals.apache.org by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> on 2005/10/04 17:56:12 UTC
Recutting 1.0.1 (was Re: [VOTE] Pluto 1.0.1)
I appologize that it's taken me this long to get to this, but I'm now
finally retagging and cutting the relesae. Anyone have any ideas why the
retag fails with the error:
Error: Source and dest appear not to be in the same repository (src: '
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/trunk'; dst: '
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/tags/release-1.0.1')
Also, is this the wrong approach? Now that we're past the rc stages should
we just be cutting new builds and voting on their quality? In such an
approach, theoretically 1.0.1 would be considered a failed build and
1.0.2would be cut and voted on as Alpha, Beta, or GA?
Thanks,
David
On 9/28/05, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I probably won't have time to recut for a couple of days. . .sorry.
> Anyone can feel free to take over if they have the time.
>
> CDoremus@hannaford.com wrote:
> >
> > The ConfigServices.properties file contained a value for
> > portaldriver.info <http://portaldriver.info> as
> pluto-driver/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT, which caused the
> > version name in the Pluto portal to include the SNAPSHOT token. I fixed
> > the file in SVN's trunk (portaldriver.info=pluto-driver/1.0.1) and
> > checked it in. David said he will cut a new release with this change.
> > /Craig
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > Craig Doremus
> > Senior J2EE Application Developer
> > Hannaford Bros
> > 207-885-2014
> > cdoremus@hannaford.com
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > *"David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>*
> >
> > 09/24/2005 02:24 PM
> > Please respond to
> > pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > To
> > pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
> > cc
> > Portals PMC <pm...@portals.apache.org>
> > Subject
> > [VOTE] Pluto 1.0.1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The test distributions of pluto 1.0.1 have been available for a few days
> > now. Once you have completed testing, please vote on whether or not
> > these should be signed and distributed as our first general availability
> > release - 1.0.1.
> >
> > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/portals/pluto/v1.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David
> >
> > David H. DeWolf wrote:
> > > 1.0.1 test builds are available at:
> > >
> > > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/portals/pluto/v1.0.1/
> > >
> > > Please begin to test. I will send out the vote within the next few
> > > days. I have also deployed these test builds to the maven repo on
> > > cvs.apache.org <http://cvs.apache.org> in order to encourage testing
> by those embedding pluto
> > > and utilizing maven.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Recutting 1.0.1 (was Re: [VOTE] Pluto 1.0.1)
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@gmail.com>.
Doh! Nice catch, thanks.
On 10/4/05, Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu> wrote:
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
> > Anyone have any ideas why the
> > retag fails with the error:
> >
> > Error: Source and dest appear not to be in the same repository (src: '
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/trunk'; dst: '
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/tags/release-1.0.1')
>
> https in the src url and http in the dst url. They both need to be the
> same protocol at least for my version (svn, version 1.2.3 (r15833)).
>
> > Also, is this the wrong approach? Now that we're past the rc stages
> should
> > we just be cutting new builds and voting on their quality? In such an
> > approach, theoretically 1.0.1 would be considered a failed build and
> > 1.0.2would be cut and voted on as Alpha, Beta, or GA?
>
> 1.0.1 has never been offically released right? So my (advisory) vote
> would be to keep the 1.0.1 version. If/had it been offically released
> I'd vote for a 1.0.2.
>
> My 0.02!
>
> Elliot
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David
> >
> > On 9/28/05, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>I probably won't have time to recut for a couple of days. . .sorry.
> >>Anyone can feel free to take over if they have the time.
> >>
> >>CDoremus@hannaford.com wrote:
> >>
> >>>The ConfigServices.properties file contained a value for
> >>>portaldriver.info <http://portaldriver.info> <http://portaldriver.info>
> as
> >>
> >>pluto-driver/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT, which caused the
> >>
> >>>version name in the Pluto portal to include the SNAPSHOT token. I fixed
> >>>the file in SVN's trunk (portaldriver.info=pluto-driver/1.0.1) and
> >>>checked it in. David said he will cut a new release with this change.
> >>>/Craig
> >>>----------------------------------------------------
> >>>Craig Doremus
> >>>Senior J2EE Application Developer
> >>>Hannaford Bros
> >>>207-885-2014
> >>>cdoremus@hannaford.com
> >>>----------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>*"David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>*
> >>>
> >>>09/24/2005 02:24 PM
> >>>Please respond to
> >>>pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>To
> >>>pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
> >>>cc
> >>>Portals PMC <pm...@portals.apache.org>
> >>>Subject
> >>>[VOTE] Pluto 1.0.1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>The test distributions of pluto 1.0.1 have been available for a few
> days
> >>>now. Once you have completed testing, please vote on whether or not
> >>>these should be signed and distributed as our first general
> availability
> >>>release - 1.0.1.
> >>>
> >>>http://cvs.apache.org/dist/portals/pluto/v1.0.1/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>David
> >>>
> >>>David H. DeWolf wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>1.0.1 test builds are available at:
> >>>>
> >>>>http://cvs.apache.org/dist/portals/pluto/v1.0.1/
> >>>>
> >>>>Please begin to test. I will send out the vote within the next few
> >>>>days. I have also deployed these test builds to the maven repo on
> >>>>cvs.apache.org <http://cvs.apache.org> <http://cvs.apache.org> in
> order to encourage testing
> >>
> >>by those embedding pluto
> >>
> >>>>and utilizing maven.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>David
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Recutting 1.0.1 (was Re: [VOTE] Pluto 1.0.1)
Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas why the
> retag fails with the error:
>
> Error: Source and dest appear not to be in the same repository (src: '
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/trunk'; dst: '
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/pluto/tags/release-1.0.1')
https in the src url and http in the dst url. They both need to be the
same protocol at least for my version (svn, version 1.2.3 (r15833)).
> Also, is this the wrong approach? Now that we're past the rc stages should
> we just be cutting new builds and voting on their quality? In such an
> approach, theoretically 1.0.1 would be considered a failed build and
> 1.0.2would be cut and voted on as Alpha, Beta, or GA?
1.0.1 has never been offically released right? So my (advisory) vote
would be to keep the 1.0.1 version. If/had it been offically released
I'd vote for a 1.0.2.
My 0.02!
Elliot
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On 9/28/05, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>I probably won't have time to recut for a couple of days. . .sorry.
>>Anyone can feel free to take over if they have the time.
>>
>>CDoremus@hannaford.com wrote:
>>
>>>The ConfigServices.properties file contained a value for
>>>portaldriver.info <http://portaldriver.info> as
>>
>>pluto-driver/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT, which caused the
>>
>>>version name in the Pluto portal to include the SNAPSHOT token. I fixed
>>>the file in SVN's trunk (portaldriver.info=pluto-driver/1.0.1) and
>>>checked it in. David said he will cut a new release with this change.
>>>/Craig
>>>----------------------------------------------------
>>>Craig Doremus
>>>Senior J2EE Application Developer
>>>Hannaford Bros
>>>207-885-2014
>>>cdoremus@hannaford.com
>>>----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>*"David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>*
>>>
>>>09/24/2005 02:24 PM
>>>Please respond to
>>>pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>To
>>>pluto-dev@portals.apache.org
>>>cc
>>>Portals PMC <pm...@portals.apache.org>
>>>Subject
>>>[VOTE] Pluto 1.0.1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>The test distributions of pluto 1.0.1 have been available for a few days
>>>now. Once you have completed testing, please vote on whether or not
>>>these should be signed and distributed as our first general availability
>>>release - 1.0.1.
>>>
>>>http://cvs.apache.org/dist/portals/pluto/v1.0.1/
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>David
>>>
>>>David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>>
>>>>1.0.1 test builds are available at:
>>>>
>>>>http://cvs.apache.org/dist/portals/pluto/v1.0.1/
>>>>
>>>>Please begin to test. I will send out the vote within the next few
>>>>days. I have also deployed these test builds to the maven repo on
>>>>cvs.apache.org <http://cvs.apache.org> in order to encourage testing
>>
>>by those embedding pluto
>>
>>>>and utilizing maven.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>