You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/10/18 11:35:58 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-4938) clarify contract for UpdateOp
with missing operation on _id
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15585037#comment-15585037 ]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-4938 at 10/18/16 11:35 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
So how about:
- create a subtask to test DS operations without explicitly setting _id, fix all implementations (and backport these changes)
- create a separate subtask to reject operations *including* setting _id, and keep that change to current trunk and subsequent versions
was (Author: reschke):
Agreed.
> clarify contract for UpdateOp with missing operation on _id
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4938
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: documentmk
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: technical_debt
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> See OAK-4937
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)