You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Shi Lei (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/21 08:32:33 UTC
[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5447) Memory Leak after shutdown embeded
broker with JDBC persistence
Shi Lei created AMQ-5447:
----------------------------
Summary: Memory Leak after shutdown embeded broker with JDBC persistence
Key: AMQ-5447
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5447
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker, Message Store
Affects Versions: 5.10.0
Environment: Windows7, JDK7
Reporter: Shi Lei
After shutdown embeded activemq broker with JDBC store, 2 'ActiveMQ JDBC PA Scheduled Task' is still alive.
Because the 2 thread's Thread factory is object of JDBCPersistenceAdapter's inner class, so the object of JDBCPersistenceAdapter can be referenced from the 2 threads, JDBCPersistenceAdapter has a field point to BrokerService. So the instance of BrokerService can be referenced from the 2 threads.
So the stopped brokerService cannot be GC.
The root cause is that when stopping JDBCPersistenceAdapter, only cancelling cleanupTicket without shutdown clockDaemon, that's why the 2 threads are still alive.
According to http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-restart-embedded-broker.html, it's better (more reliable) to instantiate the broker again instead of reuse old broker. So if I restart embeded broker, there will be 1 more BrokerService in memory. I think it's memory leak.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)