You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Tom Tromey <tr...@redhat.com> on 2004/11/03 22:19:36 UTC
Re: Javahl, alternative to jikes & Debian
>>>>> "Christophe" == Christophe Labouisse <ga...@tigris.org> writes:
I happened to see this message...
Christophe> Gcj is suggested in issue 2057 discussion and may be
Christophe> convenient as it includes gcjh which is a replacement for
Christophe> Sun's javah. This last part is currently not working
Christophe> because of a bug in gcjh which prevent it to generate
Christophe> #defines for java constants as the other javah compilers
Christophe> do (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16843).
javah is not very well defined, so it isn't that clear exactly what
constants we ought to be emitting. In particular I think the Sun
javah emits constants inherited from superclasses, but not
superinterfaces.
What do the svn bindings need? If it is just constants defined in the
current class, I can easily fix that. If it is constants from
superclasses, that is somewhat harder (our javah replacement doesn't
read superclasses at the moment).
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Javahl, alternative to jikes & Debian
Posted by Tom Tromey <tr...@redhat.com>.
>>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Mayweg <ma...@qint.de> writes:
Patrick> I just need the constants in class/interface itself. In the 1.0.x
Patrick> branch, this may be internal classes.
I checked in a fix to gcj. It will appear in GCC 4.0.
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Javahl, alternative to jikes & Debian
Posted by Patrick Mayweg <ma...@qint.de>.
Hi Tom,
I just need the constants in class/interface itself. In the 1.0.x
branch, this may be internal classes.
Patrick
Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>>"Christophe" == Christophe Labouisse <ga...@tigris.org> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
>I happened to see this message...
>
>Christophe> Gcj is suggested in issue 2057 discussion and may be
>Christophe> convenient as it includes gcjh which is a replacement for
>Christophe> Sun's javah. This last part is currently not working
>Christophe> because of a bug in gcjh which prevent it to generate
>Christophe> #defines for java constants as the other javah compilers
>Christophe> do (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16843).
>
>javah is not very well defined, so it isn't that clear exactly what
>constants we ought to be emitting. In particular I think the Sun
>javah emits constants inherited from superclasses, but not
>superinterfaces.
>
>What do the svn bindings need? If it is just constants defined in the
>current class, I can easily fix that. If it is constants from
>superclasses, that is somewhat harder (our javah replacement doesn't
>read superclasses at the moment).
>
>Tom
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org