You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Aemie (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/07 12:30:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CAMEL-14952) Better search on the website

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-14952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17152714#comment-17152714 ] 

Aemie edited comment on CAMEL-14952 at 7/7/20, 12:29 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------

[~aashnajena] For the last point that's what I have been trying to point out the mistake, you need to include all and the reason for that is there are certain topics such as Bean that comes under Component and EIP and their main toolbar link is Camel Components. And we also need to include h3 headings as well or else we are letting go of many possible search results for a query ( ex: URI format or Spring Boot Auto Configuration )

 

[~zregvart] yes, they can be removed not necessary indeed. But along with that PR, I would like to see the whole configuration problem Aashna designed to look through it. 


was (Author: aemie):
[~aashnajena] For the last point that's what I have been trying to point out the mistake, you need to include all and the reason for that is there are certain topics such as Bean that comes under Component and EIP and their main toolbar link is Camel Components. And we also need to include h3 headings as well or else we are letting go of many possible search results for a query ( ex: URI format or Spring Boot Auto Configuration )

> Better search on the website
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-14952
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-14952
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: website
>            Reporter: Zoran Regvart
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: BH4D9OD16A_apache_camel_20200608-20200614_no_result_searches.csv, List_Of_Crawled_Pages_by_DocSearch.txt, apache_demo.json, camel.json, getbootstrap-searchresult.png, image-2020-06-13-14-39-08-776.png, list_of_crawled_pages.txt, sitemap-camel.png
>
>
> We use [Algolia|http://algolia.com/] for the search functionality on the website using their [free plan|https://www.algolia.com/for-open-source/] for Open Source projects. The index is built by Algolia's crawler using the [DocSearch|https://docsearch.algolia.com/].
> When this was done we built our own UI on top of Algolia JavaScript API, as one if requirements is that clients use Algolia's JavaScript clients. We did not use Algolia UI as at that point it was rather large JavaScript dependency to add and it would slow down the loading of the website.
> We also have some [initial work|https://github.com/apache/camel-website/pull/74] on creating our own Algolia index at build time.
> The current search doesn't seem to index the whole website, some results don't appear in the search, looks like most of the content from Antora is not indexed: trying to search for {{removeHeader}}, the [FAQ entry|https://camel.apache.org/manual/latest/faq/how-to-avoid-sending-some-or-all-message-headers.html] is not found. There's also a list of failed searches on the Algolia dashboard we can use to benchmark the search.
> What we need is to build the search index over the whole content. Approach taken in [#74|https://github.com/apache/camel-website/pull/74] is good start for Hugo generated content. We need to expand that to Antora built content as well.
> This search index would be built at the website build time and would include both Hugo and Algolia content in the same file or possibly in several files if we use multi-index search. More on how indexes are built can be seen in the [Algolia documentation|https://www.algolia.com/doc/guides/sending-and-managing-data/prepare-your-data/].
> We need to figure out what data to send and how to integrate this with Antora, for Hugo we have a good idea from [#74|https://github.com/apache/camel-website/pull/74], importantly the structure needs to be the same. One good source of inspiration on building the index for Antora content is in the [Lunr.js integration|https://github.com/Mogztter/antora-lunr].
> We need to build the index with the search UI in mind, i.e. the index needs to contain the data we wish to present in the UI as well as enough content for Algolia to be able to use the content to perform search. So starting with a mockup of what we wish to present/utilize in the search UI and deriving the data structure for the index from that would be a good start.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)