You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com> on 2012/11/26 23:34:33 UTC
New Spark components
Hi,
8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at this time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed, I wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what’s the process to integrate them into the SDK ?
[1] https://github.com/badu/SparkComponents
Spark Components
-----------------------------
1. Alert (org.apache.flex.spark.components.alert.Alert)
2. ColorPicker (org.apache.flex.spark.components.colorpicker.ColorPicker)
3. HDividerGroup (org.apache.flex.spark.components.dividers.HDividerGroup)
4. VDividerGroup (org.apache.flex.spark.components.dividers.VDividerGroup)
5. Menu and MenuBar (org.apache.flex.spark.components.menu.Menu and org.apache.flex.spark.components.menu.MenuBar)
6. ProgressBar (org.apache.flex.spark.components.progressBar.ProgressBar) - Fred.
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Thank's Justin,
For what I remember I did them by himself and use them at work for a while
now, obviously no mustalla test have been done yet, I think to use them in
the app I'm doing in my whiteboard.
I'm gonna write a mail asking him for the ICLA.
- Fred.
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:01 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Hi,
> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at
> this time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
> noticed, I wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
> what’s the process to integrate them into the SDK ?
Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it work
done for someone else/a company?
>From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
added to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
namespaces once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
IIRC == if I recall correctly
ICLA == individual contributor license agreement
On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Bogdan DINU wrote:
> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Bogdan,
Please look at [1]. It tells you that you need to fill in an ICLA [2]
and send it to 'secretary@apache.org'. The secretary will inform the
PPMC when you ICLA has been processed. Meanwhile you can create a JIRA
ticket [3] with all relevant information and attach your donation to
it. This will make it available to everyone to review it.
Once all the formalities have been completed and the review doesn't
bring up anything dramatic, I'm sure the code will be added to the SVN
repo sooner rather than later.
Thank you!
EdB
1: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
2: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Bogdan DINU
<fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project,
> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>
> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
> them to the community attention in the first place.
>
> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its
>> feedback.
>>
>> Thank's guys.
>>
>>
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>
>>>
>>> How does it happen ?
>>>
>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter
>> had
>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away, so
>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>
>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course, in
>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and
>> address it before committing it.
>>
>>
>>> - Fred.
>>>
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> From: Alex Harui
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at
>>>>> this
>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed,
>>>>> I
>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>>>>> the
>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it
>>>> work
>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>
>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership
>>> of all of this work.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
>>>> added
>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>> namespaces
>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>> 1. http://www.apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://www.badu.ro
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Well, the new spark components are now checked in :)
Remains the fact that the apache.swc compiles with nothing inside, I created
a tickect.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 5:00 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
@Chema,
You was right, I'm surprised it works like that but it does, I added and
declared a new manifest file without include it (with all the used classes)
and it works, then thank you very much.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 3:31 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
I still get the problem but I've been able to use the compile-config.xml to
simply the build.xml, it was enough to add out of the compiler tag :
<include-namespaces>
<uri>http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns</uri>
</include-namespaces>
I guess, it's missing in the apache lib too, that the reason why it does not
compile what there's in the manifest file and run without errors:
<include-namespaces>
<uri>http://flex.apache.org/ns</uri>
</include-namespaces>
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 2:44 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
@Justin,
The compile target of the apache build.xml is simpler because it deleagates
the detail of the config to compile-config.xml, I tried to do so but I ran
into the problem that the manifest.xml hasn't been taken in account and had
to add manualy all the classes to ExperimentalClasses.as to solved this
issue and been to the same point I'm at the moment with the
<s:SolidColorStroke>.
BTW, if you look at the catalog.xml of the apache.swc, there's nothing
inside relative to the exposed classes, then I'm not sure the swc exposes
any classes.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 2:16 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Hi,
The compile target is looking a bit too complex than needed, for instance if
you look at the apache build.xml one (which relies on mx classes) it's much
simpler. It's it perhaps just the order in which compile targets are
compiled?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
@Chema,
You was right, I'm surprised it works like that but it does, I added and
declared a new manifest file without include it (with all the used classes)
and it works, then thank you very much.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 3:31 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
I still get the problem but I've been able to use the compile-config.xml to
simply the build.xml, it was enough to add out of the compiler tag :
<include-namespaces>
<uri>http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns</uri>
</include-namespaces>
I guess, it's missing in the apache lib too, that the reason why it does not
compile what there's in the manifest file and run without errors:
<include-namespaces>
<uri>http://flex.apache.org/ns</uri>
</include-namespaces>
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 2:44 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
@Justin,
The compile target of the apache build.xml is simpler because it deleagates
the detail of the config to compile-config.xml, I tried to do so but I ran
into the problem that the manifest.xml hasn't been taken in account and had
to add manualy all the classes to ExperimentalClasses.as to solved this
issue and been to the same point I'm at the moment with the
<s:SolidColorStroke>.
BTW, if you look at the catalog.xml of the apache.swc, there's nothing
inside relative to the exposed classes, then I'm not sure the swc exposes
any classes.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 2:16 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Hi,
The compile target is looking a bit too complex than needed, for instance if
you look at the apache build.xml one (which relies on mx classes) it's much
simpler. It's it perhaps just the order in which compile targets are
compiled?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
I still get the problem but I've been able to use the compile-config.xml to
simply the build.xml, it was enough to add out of the compiler tag :
<include-namespaces>
<uri>http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns</uri>
</include-namespaces>
I guess, it's missing in the apache lib too, that the reason why it does not
compile what there's in the manifest file and run without errors:
<include-namespaces>
<uri>http://flex.apache.org/ns</uri>
</include-namespaces>
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 2:44 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
@Justin,
The compile target of the apache build.xml is simpler because it deleagates
the detail of the config to compile-config.xml, I tried to do so but I ran
into the problem that the manifest.xml hasn't been taken in account and had
to add manualy all the classes to ExperimentalClasses.as to solved this
issue and been to the same point I'm at the moment with the
<s:SolidColorStroke>.
BTW, if you look at the catalog.xml of the apache.swc, there's nothing
inside relative to the exposed classes, then I'm not sure the swc exposes
any classes.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 2:16 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Hi,
The compile target is looking a bit too complex than needed, for instance if
you look at the apache build.xml one (which relies on mx classes) it's much
simpler. It's it perhaps just the order in which compile targets are
compiled?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
@Justin,
The compile target of the apache build.xml is simpler because it deleagates
the detail of the config to compile-config.xml, I tried to do so but I ran
into the problem that the manifest.xml hasn't been taken in account and had
to add manualy all the classes to ExperimentalClasses.as to solved this
issue and been to the same point I'm at the moment with the
<s:SolidColorStroke>.
BTW, if you look at the catalog.xml of the apache.swc, there's nothing
inside relative to the exposed classes, then I'm not sure the swc exposes
any classes.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 2:16 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Hi,
The compile target is looking a bit too complex than needed, for instance if
you look at the apache build.xml one (which relies on mx classes) it's much
simpler. It's it perhaps just the order in which compile targets are
compiled?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
The compile target is looking a bit too complex than needed, for instance if you look at the apache build.xml one (which relies on mx classes) it's much simpler. It's it perhaps just the order in which compile targets are compiled?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
@Chema
I don't want to include the manifest of other libraries and it's not like
that in others or maybe I missed something.
@Justin
I double checked my manifest.xml and it contains all classes included inside
the experimental library
I had the same problem with <s:Skin> and I resolved it adding <include
name="spark.swc"/> as an external library path, I guessed the solution would
have been to include another library, thus, I tried a few but without
success.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 1:16 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
HI,
> In the meantime, I think this has something to do with namespaces and
> manifests. I'd say you need to add something like.
My guess (and I've not looked at the code) would be that the new classes are
missing from the manifest files. Take a look at apache/manifest.xml for a
simple example.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
HI,
> In the meantime, I think this has something to do with namespaces and
> manifests. I'd say you need to add something like.
My guess (and I've not looked at the code) would be that the new classes are missing from the manifest files. Take a look at apache/manifest.xml for a simple example.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Chema Balsas <jb...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I'm still getting to know some of this stuff, so I'd like someone more
experienced to try and explain :)
In the meantime, I think this has something to do with namespaces and
manifests. I'd say you need to add something like
<namespace uri="*library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark*"
manifest="${basedir}/manifest_spark.**xml"/>
You can then copy the contents for manifest_spark.xml from manifest.xml
inside the airspark folder, for example (you should even be able to remove
most of the declarations there and still get it to compile).
As I said, this is just something for you to try, but better see if someone
else can chime in.
Let us know!
Cheers,
Chema
2012/12/15 Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to check in the sources, before, I tried to compile via Ant,
> creating the build targets, as I don't know Ant/compc/mxmlc (generaly, I
> compile via maven), I'm facing an issue, <s:SolidColorStroke> can't be
> resolved as a component implementation, this is my ant target :
>
>
> <target name="compile" description="Compiles experimental.swc">
> <echo message="Compiling frameworks/libs/experimental.**swc"/>
>
> <!-- Load the <compc> task. We can't do this at the <project> level
> -->
> <!-- because targets that run before flexTasks.jar gets built would
> fail. -->
> <taskdef resource="flexTasks.tasks" classpath="${FLEX_HOME}/lib/**
> flexTasks.jar"/>
> <compc fork="true"
> include-classes="**ExperimentalClasses"
> output="${FLEX_HOME}/**frameworks/libs/experimental.**swc"
> resource-bundle-list="${**basedir}/bundles.properties">
> <jvmarg line="${compc.jvm.args}"/>
> <namespace uri="http://flex.apache.org/**experimental/ns<http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns>"
> manifest="${basedir}/manifest.**xml"/>
> <include-namespaces>http://**flex.apache.org/experimental/**ns<http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns>
> </include-namespaces>
> <source-path path-element="${basedir}/src"/**>
> <library-path />
> <external-library-path dir="${env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME}"**>
> <include name="${playerglobal.version}/**
> playerglobal.swc"/>
> </external-library-path>
> <external-library-path dir="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/**libs">
> <include name="framework.swc"/>
> <include name="spark.swc"/>
> </external-library-path>
> <include-file name="experimental.css"
> path="${basedir}/defaults.css"**/>
> <locale/>
> <keep-as3-metadata name="SkinPart"/>
> <accessible>true</accessible>
> <show-deprecation-warnings>**false</show-deprecation-**
> warnings>
> <warn-no-constructor>false</**warn-no-constructor>
> </compc>
> </target>
>
>
> Because SolidColorStroke is defined in mx.graphics, I thought may be
> include mx/mx.swc as external library path but it didn't work, a help would
> be very appreciated.
>
>
> - Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:29 PM
>
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
> We've been putting them in SVN because we did so at Adobe. I know folks
> don't like it, but when the project setup isn't trivial (you need dependent
> projects) I think it is helpful. The pain point is you have to hand edit
> the file before submitting to make sure it doesn't have absolute paths in
> it.
>
>
> On 12/12/12 4:55 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank's Nick
>>
>> - Fred
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:51 PM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>> I was pretty sure we were trying to avoid them when possible...
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
>> <we...@hotmail.com>**wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools
>>> like Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and
>>> there
>>> are provided in the Bogdan's zip, I was wondering if I should still
>>> include
>>> them or not, what the policy ?
>>>
>>> - Fred
>>>
>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Frédéric THOMAS
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42 AM
>>>
>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>
>>> Oups, I missed this message.
>>>
>>> Yes, sure, I do that.
>>>
>>> - Fred
>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM
>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>
>>> Frédéric,
>>>
>>> Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
>>>> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
>>>> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the
>>>> project
>>>> PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
>>>>
>>>> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Bogdan DINU
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take
>>>>> further
>>>>> action on this side.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA
>>>>>> issue
>>>>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/FLEX-33284<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.or <https://issues.apache.or>
>>>>> g/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>>>>> <we...@hotmail.com>****wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be
>>>>>>> away
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial
>>>>>>> project,
>>>>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a
>>>>>>> Robotlegs
>>>>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>>>>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've
>>>>>>> brought
>>>>>>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for
>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank's guys.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> submitter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> had
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> away,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> so
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> course,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> address it before committing it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> what¹s
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> was it
>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>>>>>>> ownership
>>>>>>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> added
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>>>>>>> namespaces
>>>>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/********licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/******licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/** <http://www.apache.org/**>
>>>>>>>>>> **licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt<http://apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://**apache.org/license <http://apache.org/license>
>>>>>>>>>> s/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/****licenses/<http://www.apache.org/**licenses/><
>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/<http://www.apache.org/licenses/>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://www.badu.ro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Alex Harui
>>> Flex SDK Team
>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Hi,
I'm about to check in the sources, before, I tried to compile via Ant,
creating the build targets, as I don't know Ant/compc/mxmlc (generaly, I
compile via maven), I'm facing an issue, <s:SolidColorStroke> can't be
resolved as a component implementation, this is my ant target :
<target name="compile" description="Compiles experimental.swc">
<echo message="Compiling frameworks/libs/experimental.swc"/>
<!-- Load the <compc> task. We can't do this at the <project>
level -->
<!-- because targets that run before flexTasks.jar gets built would
fail. -->
<taskdef resource="flexTasks.tasks"
classpath="${FLEX_HOME}/lib/flexTasks.jar"/>
<compc fork="true"
include-classes="ExperimentalClasses"
output="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/libs/experimental.swc"
resource-bundle-list="${basedir}/bundles.properties">
<jvmarg line="${compc.jvm.args}"/>
<namespace uri="http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns"
manifest="${basedir}/manifest.xml"/>
<include-namespaces>http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns</include-namespaces>
<source-path path-element="${basedir}/src"/>
<library-path />
<external-library-path dir="${env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME}">
<include name="${playerglobal.version}/playerglobal.swc"/>
</external-library-path>
<external-library-path dir="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/libs">
<include name="framework.swc"/>
<include name="spark.swc"/>
</external-library-path>
<include-file name="experimental.css"
path="${basedir}/defaults.css"/>
<locale/>
<keep-as3-metadata name="SkinPart"/>
<accessible>true</accessible>
<show-deprecation-warnings>false</show-deprecation-warnings>
<warn-no-constructor>false</warn-no-constructor>
</compc>
</target>
Because SolidColorStroke is defined in mx.graphics, I thought may be include
mx/mx.swc as external library path but it didn't work, a help would be very
appreciated.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:29 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
We've been putting them in SVN because we did so at Adobe. I know folks
don't like it, but when the project setup isn't trivial (you need dependent
projects) I think it is helpful. The pain point is you have to hand edit
the file before submitting to make sure it doesn't have absolute paths in
it.
On 12/12/12 4:55 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thank's Nick
>
> - Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:51 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
> I was pretty sure we were trying to avoid them when possible...
>
> -Nick
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
> <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools
>> like Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and
>> there
>> are provided in the Bogdan's zip, I was wondering if I should still
>> include
>> them or not, what the policy ?
>>
>> - Fred
>>
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Frédéric THOMAS
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42 AM
>>
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>> Oups, I missed this message.
>>
>> Yes, sure, I do that.
>>
>> - Fred
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>> Frédéric,
>>
>> Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
>>> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
>>> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the
>>> project
>>> PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
>>>
>>> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bogdan DINU
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take
>>>> further
>>>> action on this side.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA
>>>>> issue
>>>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
>>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33284<https://issues.apache.or
>>>> g/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>>>> <we...@hotmail.com>**wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be
>>>>>> away
>>>>>>
>>>>> for
>>>>
>>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial
>>>>>> project,
>>>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a
>>>>>> Robotlegs
>>>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>>>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've
>>>>>> brought
>>>>>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>>>>>>
>>>>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> **wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for
>>>>>> its
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank's guys.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> submitter
>>>>
>>>>> had
>>>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> away,
>>>>
>>>>> so
>>>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> course,
>>>>
>>>>> in
>>>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and
>>>>
>>>>> address it before committing it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>
>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> what¹s
>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or
>>>>>>>>> was it
>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>>>>>> ownership
>>>>>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>
>>>>> added
>>>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>>>>>> namespaces
>>>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/******licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/**
>>>>>>>>> **licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>>
>>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://apache.org/license
>>>>>>>>> s/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/ <http://www.apache.org/licenses/>
>>>>
>>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://www.badu.ro
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alex Harui
>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
We've been putting them in SVN because we did so at Adobe. I know folks
don't like it, but when the project setup isn't trivial (you need dependent
projects) I think it is helpful. The pain point is you have to hand edit
the file before submitting to make sure it doesn't have absolute paths in
it.
On 12/12/12 4:55 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thank's Nick
>
> - Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:51 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
> I was pretty sure we were trying to avoid them when possible...
>
> -Nick
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
> <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools
>> like Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and
>> there
>> are provided in the Bogdan's zip, I was wondering if I should still
>> include
>> them or not, what the policy ?
>>
>> - Fred
>>
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Frédéric THOMAS
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42 AM
>>
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>> Oups, I missed this message.
>>
>> Yes, sure, I do that.
>>
>> - Fred
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>> Frédéric,
>>
>> Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
>>> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
>>> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the
>>> project
>>> PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
>>>
>>> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bogdan DINU
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take
>>>> further
>>>> action on this side.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
>>>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
>>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33284<https://issues.apache.or
>>>> g/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>>>> <we...@hotmail.com>**wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away
>>>>>>
>>>>> for
>>>>
>>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial
>>>>>> project,
>>>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a
>>>>>> Robotlegs
>>>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>>>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've
>>>>>> brought
>>>>>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>>>>>>
>>>>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> **wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for
>>>>>> its
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank's guys.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> submitter
>>>>
>>>>> had
>>>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> away,
>>>>
>>>>> so
>>>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> course,
>>>>
>>>>> in
>>>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and
>>>>
>>>>> address it before committing it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>
>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> what¹s
>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or
>>>>>>>>> was it
>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>>>>>> ownership
>>>>>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>
>>>>> added
>>>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>>>>>> namespaces
>>>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/******licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/**
>>>>>>>>> **licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>>
>>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://apache.org/license
>>>>>>>>> s/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/ <http://www.apache.org/licenses/>
>>>>
>>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://www.badu.ro
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alex Harui
>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Thank's Nick
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:51 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
I was pretty sure we were trying to avoid them when possible...
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
<we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools
> like Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and
> there
> are provided in the Bogdan's zip, I was wondering if I should still
> include
> them or not, what the policy ?
>
> - Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42 AM
>
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
> Oups, I missed this message.
>
> Yes, sure, I do that.
>
> - Fred
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
> Frédéric,
>
> Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
>> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
>> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the
>> project
>> PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
>>
>> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bogdan DINU
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>
>>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take
>>> further
>>> action on this side.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
>>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33284<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>> >
>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>>> <we...@hotmail.com>**wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away
>>>>>
>>>> for
>>>
>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial
>>>>> project,
>>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a
>>>>> Robotlegs
>>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've
>>>>> brought
>>>>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>>>>>
>>>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>>
>>>> **wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for
>>>>> its
>>>>>
>>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank's guys.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> submitter
>>>
>>>> had
>>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
>>>>>>
>>>>> away,
>>>
>>>> so
>>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
>>>>>>
>>>>> course,
>>>
>>>> in
>>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
>>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>
>>>> address it before committing it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but
>>>
>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> what¹s
>>>
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or
>>>>>>>> was it
>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>>>>> ownership
>>>>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> been
>>>
>>>> added
>>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>>>>> namespaces
>>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/******licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>
>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/ <http://www.apache.org/licenses/>
>>>
>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://www.badu.ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Harui
>>> Flex SDK Team
>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Nicholas Kwiatkowski <ni...@spoon.as>.
I was pretty sure we were trying to avoid them when possible...
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools
> like Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and there
> are provided in the Bogdan's zip, I was wondering if I should still include
> them or not, what the policy ?
>
> - Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42 AM
>
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
> Oups, I missed this message.
>
> Yes, sure, I do that.
>
> - Fred
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
> Frédéric,
>
> Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
>> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
>> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the
>> project
>> PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
>>
>> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bogdan DINU
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>
>>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take
>>> further
>>> action on this side.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
>>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-33284<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>> >
>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>>> <we...@hotmail.com>**wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away
>>>>>
>>>> for
>>>
>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial
>>>>> project,
>>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
>>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
>>>>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>>>>>
>>>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>>
>>>> **wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for
>>>>> its
>>>>>
>>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank's guys.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> submitter
>>>
>>>> had
>>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
>>>>>>
>>>>> away,
>>>
>>>> so
>>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
>>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
>>>>>>
>>>>> course,
>>>
>>>> in
>>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
>>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>
>>>> address it before committing it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but
>>>
>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> what¹s
>>>
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or
>>>>>>>> was it
>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>>>>> ownership
>>>>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> been
>>>
>>>> added
>>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>>>>> namespaces
>>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/******licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>
>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>
>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/ <http://www.apache.org/licenses/>
>>>
>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://www.badu.ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Harui
>>> Flex SDK Team
>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Hi,
As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools like
Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and there are
provided in the Bogdan's zip, I was wondering if I should still include them
or not, what the policy ?
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:42 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Oups, I missed this message.
Yes, sure, I do that.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Frédéric,
Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
-Alex
On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the
> project
> PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
>
> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan DINU
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take
>> further
>> action on this side.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>> .
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bogdan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>> <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>
>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away
>> for
>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>>>
>>>> - Fred.
>>>>
>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>>>
>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial
>>>> project,
>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
>>>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>>> **wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for
>>>> its
>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank's guys.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
>> submitter
>>>>> had
>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
>> away,
>>>>> so
>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>>>
>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
>> course,
>>>>> in
>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
>> and
>>>>> address it before committing it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
>> but
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
>> what¹s
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>>>> ownership
>>>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
>> been
>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>>>> namespaces
>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt<
>> http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/licenses/icla.txt<
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>>>>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.badu.ro
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Oups, I missed this message.
Yes, sure, I do that.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:25 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Frédéric,
Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
-Alex
On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the
> project
> PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
>
> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan DINU
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take
>> further
>> action on this side.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>> .
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bogdan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>> <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>
>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away
>> for
>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>>>
>>>> - Fred.
>>>>
>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>>>
>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial
>>>> project,
>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
>>>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>>> **wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for
>>>> its
>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank's guys.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
>> submitter
>>>>> had
>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
>> away,
>>>>> so
>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>>>
>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
>> course,
>>>>> in
>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
>> and
>>>>> address it before committing it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
>> but
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
>> what¹s
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>>>> ownership
>>>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
>> been
>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>>>> namespaces
>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt<
>> http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/licenses/icla.txt<
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>>>>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.badu.ro
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Frédéric,
Do you have time to work on Bogdan's contribution?
-Alex
On 12/5/12 10:50 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
> your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
> records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the project
> PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
>
> Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan DINU
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take further
>> action on this side.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
>>> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
>>> .
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bogdan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
>>> <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>
>>>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away
>> for
>>>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>>>
>>>> - Fred.
>>>>
>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>>>
>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project,
>>>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
>>>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>>>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
>>>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>>> **wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its
>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank's guys.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
>> submitter
>>>>> had
>>>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
>> away,
>>>>> so
>>>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>>>
>>>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
>>>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
>> course,
>>>>> in
>>>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
>> and
>>>>> address it before committing it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Fred.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
>> but
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
>> what¹s
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>>>> ownership
>>>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
>> been
>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>>>> namespaces
>>>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt<
>> http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/licenses/icla.txt<
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>>>>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://www.badu.ro
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Bogdan DINU <fl...@gmail.com>.
Hi everyone,
the answer from the secretary was "This message acknowledges receipt of
your ICLA, which has been filed in the Apache Software Foundation
records. If you have been invited as a committer, please advise the project
PMC that your ICLA has been filed."
Just letting you know that ICLA was recorded :)
Best regards,
Bogdan DINU
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take further
> action on this side.
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
> > (improvement) - Flex - 33284<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
> > .
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bogdan
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
> > <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Bogdan,
> >>
> >> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away
> for
> >> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your contribution.
> >>
> >> - Fred.
> >>
> >> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
> >>
> >> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: New Spark components
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project,
> >> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
> >> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
> >>
> >> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
> >> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
> >> them to the community attention in the first place.
> >>
> >> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Bogdan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
> >> **wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its
> >>> feedback.
> >>>
> >>> Thank's guys.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
> >>>
> >>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> How does it happen ?
> >>>>
> >>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch
> submitter
> >>> had
> >>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went
> away,
> >>> so
> >>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
> >>>
> >>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
> >>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of
> course,
> >>> in
> >>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop
> and
> >>> address it before committing it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Fred.
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Message d'origine-----
> >>>> From: Alex Harui
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
> >>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did
> but
> >>>>> at
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
> >>>>>> noticed,
> >>>>>> I
> >>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them,
> what¹s
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it
> >>>>> work
> >>>>> done for someone else/a company?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
> >>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
> >>>> ownership
> >>>> of all of this work.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these
> been
> >>>>> added
> >>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
> >>>>> namespaces
> >>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Justin
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1.
> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt<
> http://www.apache.org/**licens
> >>>>> es/icla.txt>
> >>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/licenses/icla.txt<
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/
> >>>>> icla.txt>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>> Alex Harui
> >>> Flex SDK Team
> >>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.badu.ro
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
--
http://www.badu.ro
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Hi Bogdan,
Thanks. We have to wait for the ICLA to be recorded before we take further
action on this side.
-Alex
On 12/2/12 11:20 PM, "Bogdan DINU" <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
> (improvement) - Flex - 33284<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
> .
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
> <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away for
>> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>>
>> Thank you for your contribution.
>>
>> - Fred.
>>
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>>
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project,
>> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
>> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>>
>> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
>> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
>> them to the community attention in the first place.
>>
>> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>
>> **wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its
>>> feedback.
>>>
>>> Thank's guys.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>>
>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> How does it happen ?
>>>>
>>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter
>>> had
>>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away,
>>> so
>>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>>
>>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
>>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course,
>>> in
>>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and
>>> address it before committing it.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Fred.
>>>>
>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>> From: Alex Harui
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>>> noticed,
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it
>>>>> work
>>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>>
>>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>>> ownership
>>>> of all of this work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
>>>>> added
>>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>>> namespaces
>>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Justin
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/**licens
>>>>> es/icla.txt>
>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>>>>> icla.txt>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Alex Harui
>>> Flex SDK Team
>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.badu.ro
>>
>
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Bogdan DINU <fl...@gmail.com>.
Hello everyone,
as instructed, I have sent the ICLA to secretary and created JIRA issue
(improvement) - Flex - 33284<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33284>
.
Best regards,
Bogdan
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away for
> 2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
>
> Thank you for your contribution.
>
> - Fred.
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Bogdan DINU
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
>
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
> Hi,
>
> I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project,
> the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
> alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
>
> I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
> definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
> them to the community attention in the first place.
>
> Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
>
> Best regards,
> Bogdan
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>
> **wrote:
>
> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its
>> feedback.
>>
>> Thank's guys.
>>
>>
>> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>>
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>>
>>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> How does it happen ?
>>>
>>> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter
>> had
>> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away,
>> so
>> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>>
>> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
>> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course,
>> in
>> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and
>> address it before committing it.
>>
>>
>> - Fred.
>>>
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> From: Alex Harui
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>>> this
>>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>>> noticed,
>>>>> I
>>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>>>>> the
>>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it
>>>> work
>>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>>> ownership
>>> of all of this work.
>>>
>>>
>>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
>>>> added
>>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>>> namespaces
>>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>> 1. http://www.apache.org/****licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt>
>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://www.badu.ro
>
--
http://www.badu.ro
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Bogdan,
I sent you a personnal email with the entire process too, I'll be away for
2-3 days, I suppose Erik or someone will take care of your donation.
Thank you for your contribution.
- Fred.
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Bogdan DINU
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:46 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
Hi,
I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project,
the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
them to the community attention in the first place.
Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
Best regards,
Bogdan
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
<we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its
> feedback.
>
> Thank's guys.
>
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
>
>
>
> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>
>>
>> How does it happen ?
>>
> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter
> had
> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away,
> so
> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>
> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course,
> in
> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and
> address it before committing it.
>
>
>> - Fred.
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> From: Alex Harui
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but
>>> at
>>>> this
>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so
>>>> noticed,
>>>> I
>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>>>> the
>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it
>>> work
>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>
>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the
>> ownership
>> of all of this work.
>>
>>>
>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
>>> added
>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>> namespaces
>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> http://www.apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>
>>>
>>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
--
http://www.badu.ro
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Bogdan DINU <fl...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I own the components - even if I have used them in a commercial project,
the owners of it know that they are open source (aside with a Robotlegs
alike framework which they wanted to support being opened).
I have no idea what the acronyms like IIRC or ICLA means, but I'm
definitely interested in donating those components - since I've brought
them to the community attention in the first place.
Looking forward to know about the necessary steps.
Best regards,
Bogdan
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its
> feedback.
>
> Thank's guys.
>
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
>
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
>
>
>
> On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>>>
>>
>> How does it happen ?
>>
> There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter
> had
> to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away, so
> if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
>
> You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
> handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course, in
> your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and
> address it before committing it.
>
>
>> - Fred.
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> From: Alex Harui
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at
>>>> this
>>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed,
>>>> I
>>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>>>> the
>>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it
>>> work
>>> done for someone else/a company?
>>>
>> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
>> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership
>> of all of this work.
>>
>>>
>>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
>>> added
>>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>>> namespaces
>>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> 1. http://www.apache.org/**licenses/icla.txt<http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>
>>>
>>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
--
http://www.badu.ro
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Ok, I just sent him an email with the all process, waitting now for its
feedback.
Thank's guys.
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 1:13 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>
> How does it happen ?
There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter had
to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away, so
if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course, in
your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and
address it before committing it.
>
> - Fred.
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
>
>
>
> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at
>>> this
>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed,
>>> I
>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>>> the
>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>
>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it
>> work
>> done for someone else/a company?
> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership
> of all of this work.
>>
>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
>> added
>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>> namespaces
>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>> 1. http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 11/26/12 4:00 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <we...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
>
> How does it happen ?
There used to be a checkbox on each JIRA issue where the patch submitter had
to indicate that they owned their contribution. I think that went away, so
if it isn't there anymore, then I guess we just have to ask them.
You should also review the code before committing to the code base and
handle any copyright notices according to Apache Legal. And, of course, in
your review, if you notice any obvious IP violation, you should stop and
address it before committing it.
>
> - Fred.
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Spark components
>
>
>
>
> On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at
>>> this
>>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed,
>>> I
>>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>>> the
>>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>>
>> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it work
>> done for someone else/a company?
> IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
> significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership
> of all of this work.
>>
>> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
>> added
>> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
>> namespaces
>> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>> 1. http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Frédéric THOMAS <we...@hotmail.com>.
Hi,
> Either way, we do have to verify the ownership of all of this work
How does it happen ?
- Fred.
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:53 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Spark components
On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at
>> this
>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed,
>> I
>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s
>> the
>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>
> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it work
> done for someone else/a company?
IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership
of all of this work.
>
> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been
> added
> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other
> namespaces
> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 11/26/12 3:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at this
>> time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed, I
>> wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what¹s the
>> process to integrate them into the SDK ?
>
> Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it work
> done for someone else/a company?
IIRC, an ICLA is not mandatory for patches, but is a good idea for
significant contributions. Either way, we do have to verify the ownership
of all of this work.
>
> From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been added
> to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other namespaces
> once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: New Spark components
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> 8 months ago, Bogdan presented missing spark components[1] he did but at this time there was so much excitement on the ML, it has not been so noticed, I wanted to bring to your attention he wanted to contribute them, what’s the process to integrate them into the SDK ?
Has he signed a ICLA? [1] Do we know that it's his own work or was it work done for someone else/a company?
From a quick glance at the code I wouldn't see an issue with these been added to the experimental namespace and then moved into one of the other namespaces once they be in use for a while / have full tests.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt