You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Antoine Levy Lambert <an...@gmx.de> on 2013/05/03 04:36:35 UTC
Ant 1.9.1 ?
Hi,
when I built Ant 1.9.0 we were already talking about releasing an Ant 1.9.1 - in principle a month later. We are well over that time.
Do we have bugs that should get fixed in Ant 1.9.1 ? Who can fix them ?
I could build Ant 1.9.1 end of next week - so in the week-end 11 to 12th may.
Regards,
Antoine
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
AW: Ant 1.9.1 ?
Posted by "Jan Matèrne (jhm)" <ap...@materne.de>.
Eclipse is watching
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=395421 "update to Ant 1.9.1"
;-)
Jan
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:conor@apache.org]
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. Mai 2013 03:32
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Ant 1.9.1 ?
>
> Sounds good.
>
> Conor
>
> On 13 May 2013 11:08, Antoine Levy Lambert <an...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > I am delaying creating a candidate build for Ant 1.9.1 until
> Wednesday May 15th.
> >
> > I have just fixed bug 54940 and this way other committers can review
> my changes before the build.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.1 ?
Posted by Antoine Levy Lambert <an...@gmx.de>.
Hello Jess,
the release notes (WHATSNEW file) contains this blurb :
Provide more control over Zip64 extensions created by <zip> and
related tasks. In particular no Zip64 extensions will be used at
all by the <jar> task family by default - this is required for jars
to be readably by Java5.
Bugzilla Report 54762
So I suppose that the problem that you are referring to is fixed in the current svn trunk and this fix will be include in ant 1.9.1
Regards,
Antoine
On May 14, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
> To be a bit less vague, one such error is:
>
> java.util.zip.ZipException: central directory zip64 extended information extra field's length doesn't match central directory data. Expected length 0 but is 16
> at org.apache.tools.zip.Zip64ExtendedInformationExtraField.reparseCentralDirectoryData(Zip64ExtendedInformationExtraField.java:258)
>
> I'm not clear of all the different error paths here -- nor of the exact one causing this particular trace or even the rest of the trace, unfortunately.
>
> On 5/14/2013 7:19 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
>> The top thing we've noticed with Ant 1.9.0 is issues dealing with existing zip files, i.e. errors about the extra data not matching the central catalog or some such.
>>
>> It seems that previous versions of Ant used to try to fill out the extra data bytes and the new Ant handling of the old data state isn't very smooth (i.e. doesn't work).
>>
>> While Ant 1.9.0 seems to work fine otherwise, it would be good to address rough edges in this particular area.
>>
>> --
>> Jess Holle
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.1 ?
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
On 5/14/2013 11:08 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Is this Ant unzipping an archive created outside of Ant? From the error
> message I'd think it is.
>
> If so, can you provide such an archive yourself and tell us how you've
> created it? If not, can you verify the archive's integrity with a toll
> other than Ant or the one that created the jar - InfoZip's zip or WinZip
> for example.
I thought this involved cases where the zip was created by Ant 1.8.x and
then read by Ant 1.9.x, but I'm checking with those a bit more closely
involved for details.
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.1 ?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2013-05-14, Jess Holle wrote:
> To be a bit less vague, one such error is:
> java.util.zip.ZipException: central directory zip64 extended
> information extra field's length doesn't match central directory
> data. Expected length 0 but is 16
> at
> org.apache.tools.zip.Zip64ExtendedInformationExtraField.reparseCentralDirectoryData(Zip64ExtendedInformationExtraField.java:258)
> I'm not clear of all the different error paths here -- nor of the
> exact one causing this particular trace or even the rest of the trace,
> unfortunately.
Is this Ant unzipping an archive created outside of Ant? From the error
message I'd think it is.
If so, can you provide such an archive yourself and tell us how you've
created it? If not, can you verify the archive's integrity with a toll
other than Ant or the one that created the jar - InfoZip's zip or WinZip
for example.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.1 ?
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
To be a bit less vague, one such error is:
java.util.zip.ZipException: central directory zip64 extended information
extra field's length doesn't match central directory data. Expected
length 0 but is 16
at
org.apache.tools.zip.Zip64ExtendedInformationExtraField.reparseCentralDirectoryData(Zip64ExtendedInformationExtraField.java:258)
I'm not clear of all the different error paths here -- nor of the exact
one causing this particular trace or even the rest of the trace,
unfortunately.
On 5/14/2013 7:19 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
> The top thing we've noticed with Ant 1.9.0 is issues dealing with
> existing zip files, i.e. errors about the extra data not matching the
> central catalog or some such.
>
> It seems that previous versions of Ant used to try to fill out the
> extra data bytes and the new Ant handling of the old data state isn't
> very smooth (i.e. doesn't work).
>
> While Ant 1.9.0 seems to work fine otherwise, it would be good to
> address rough edges in this particular area.
>
> --
> Jess Holle
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.1 ?
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
The top thing we've noticed with Ant 1.9.0 is issues dealing with
existing zip files, i.e. errors about the extra data not matching the
central catalog or some such.
It seems that previous versions of Ant used to try to fill out the extra
data bytes and the new Ant handling of the old data state isn't very
smooth (i.e. doesn't work).
While Ant 1.9.0 seems to work fine otherwise, it would be good to
address rough edges in this particular area.
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.1 ?
Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@apache.org>.
Sounds good.
Conor
On 13 May 2013 11:08, Antoine Levy Lambert <an...@gmx.de> wrote:
> I am delaying creating a candidate build for Ant 1.9.1 until Wednesday May 15th.
>
> I have just fixed bug 54940 and this way other committers can review my changes before the build.
>
> Regards,
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: Ant 1.9.1 ?
Posted by Antoine Levy Lambert <an...@gmx.de>.
I am delaying creating a candidate build for Ant 1.9.1 until Wednesday May 15th.
I have just fixed bug 54940 and this way other committers can review my changes before the build.
Regards,
Antoine
On May 2, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I built Ant 1.9.0 we were already talking about releasing an Ant 1.9.1 - in principle a month later. We are well over that time.
>
> Do we have bugs that should get fixed in Ant 1.9.1 ? Who can fix them ?
>
> I could build Ant 1.9.1 end of next week - so in the week-end 11 to 12th may.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org