You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by Yexi Jiang <ye...@gmail.com> on 2014/01/29 17:13:27 UTC

About the DoubleVector/DoubleMath

Hi, all,

It seems that Apache Mahout already has good implementations of
Vector/Matrix. Do we need to also define ourselves? Or we just reuse theirs?

If we define ourselves, we need to maintain them in the future. If we reuse
theirs, we need to do a significant amount of refactoring on the whole ml
package.

Regards,
Yexi

-- 
------
Yexi Jiang,
ECS 251,  yjian004@cs.fiu.edu
School of Computer and Information Science,
Florida International University
Homepage: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~yjian004/

Re: About the DoubleVector/DoubleMath

Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
I've no strong opinion on that, for me whatever works best.
I'd say as long as we don't have any specific reasons to use Mahout ones
let's keep with our stuff but IMHO when something non-trivial in there
becomes required / useful for Hama then we may switch to that.
Besides that switching to Mahout version would ease integration.

Tommaso


2014-01-29 Yexi Jiang <ye...@gmail.com>

> Hi, all,
>
> It seems that Apache Mahout already has good implementations of
> Vector/Matrix. Do we need to also define ourselves? Or we just reuse
> theirs?
>
> If we define ourselves, we need to maintain them in the future. If we reuse
> theirs, we need to do a significant amount of refactoring on the whole ml
> package.
>
> Regards,
> Yexi
>
> --
> ------
> Yexi Jiang,
> ECS 251,  yjian004@cs.fiu.edu
> School of Computer and Information Science,
> Florida International University
> Homepage: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~yjian004/
>