You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> on 2005/07/25 23:27:23 UTC
[proposal] Add some meaningful 'component' entries to JIRA
JIRA has a field for the relevant component(s) for a bug. Currently
the list of choices is empty and we're not making use of this field.
I suggest we use the following choices:
general
tomahawk
tomahawk (RI compatability)
sandbox
examples
JSF 1.1
The last entryI think would be particularly useful for tracking JSF
compliance issues. Before the TCK we should be focusing our energies
on achieving JSF compliance. I think it would also be good to
highlight problems with Tomahawk and the RI as they are discovered.
sean
Re: [proposal] Add some meaningful 'component' entries to JIRA
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Manfred,
Did you add these to JIRA yet?
sean
On 7/26/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 :-)
>
> 2005/7/25, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > +1
> > if nobody is against this I will add the proposed components tomorrow.
> >
> > -Manfred
> >
> > 2005/7/25, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > JIRA has a field for the relevant component(s) for a bug. Currently
> > > the list of choices is empty and we're not making use of this field.
> > > I suggest we use the following choices:
> > >
> > > general
> > > tomahawk
> > > tomahawk (RI compatability)
> > > sandbox
> > > examples
> > > JSF 1.1
> > >
> > > The last entryI think would be particularly useful for tracking JSF
> > > compliance issues. Before the TCK we should be focusing our energies
> > > on achieving JSF compliance. I think it would also be good to
> > > highlight problems with Tomahawk and the RI as they are discovered.
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> >
>
Re: [proposal] Add some meaningful 'component' entries to JIRA
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
+1 :-)
2005/7/25, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> +1
> if nobody is against this I will add the proposed components tomorrow.
>
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/7/25, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > JIRA has a field for the relevant component(s) for a bug. Currently
> > the list of choices is empty and we're not making use of this field.
> > I suggest we use the following choices:
> >
> > general
> > tomahawk
> > tomahawk (RI compatability)
> > sandbox
> > examples
> > JSF 1.1
> >
> > The last entryI think would be particularly useful for tracking JSF
> > compliance issues. Before the TCK we should be focusing our energies
> > on achieving JSF compliance. I think it would also be good to
> > highlight problems with Tomahawk and the RI as they are discovered.
> >
> > sean
> >
>
Re: [proposal] Add some meaningful 'component' entries to JIRA
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
if nobody is against this I will add the proposed components tomorrow.
-Manfred
2005/7/25, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> JIRA has a field for the relevant component(s) for a bug. Currently
> the list of choices is empty and we're not making use of this field.
> I suggest we use the following choices:
>
> general
> tomahawk
> tomahawk (RI compatability)
> sandbox
> examples
> JSF 1.1
>
> The last entryI think would be particularly useful for tracking JSF
> compliance issues. Before the TCK we should be focusing our energies
> on achieving JSF compliance. I think it would also be good to
> highlight problems with Tomahawk and the RI as they are discovered.
>
> sean
>