You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "SIBISH BASHEER (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/09/06 20:32:29 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-778) logback better than log4j2 as per log4j author

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

SIBISH BASHEER closed LOG4J2-778.
---------------------------------

Thanks. Architects agreed that log4j2 is fine after providing the justifications on this chain. 

> logback better than log4j2 as per log4j author
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-778
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-778
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: SIBISH BASHEER
>              Labels: log4j, logback
>
> Hi log4j2 Team,
> If you remember, i had developed a custom logger for splunk based on log4j2 with the log4j2 team's help and had presented to my architects. Unfortunately the decision from the architects was not to use log4j2 because of the reason that log4j main author recommends logback not log4j2.
> Have you heard of any such statements and if there is any scenario where logback is better than log4j2?
> Thanks
> Sibish



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org