You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Om <bi...@gmail.com> on 2012/11/06 21:22:01 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
The vote passes with the following results:
+1 Binding:
Erik de Bruin
Alex Harui
Greg Reddin (Mentor/IPMC)
Om
+1 Non-binding:
Roland Zwaga
Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz
I will start a vote thread on general@incubator.apache.org now.
Thanks to everyone who voted!
Regards,
Om
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Signature ok.
> Rat ok.
> Source built.
>
>
> On 11/6/12 12:01 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
> >
> > We received feedback on general@incubator.apache.org regarding RC9.
> Here
> > is the email thread for that vote thread:
> > http://markmail.org/thread/yx263i737qtfbszf
> > We have fixed all these issues in this Release Candidate.
> >
> > 1. Incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
> > 2. Incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file
> > 3. Incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> > 4. Incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> > 5. In the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root but
> > in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to root
> > when we packaged everything.
> >
> > This is the first official release of the Apache Flex SDK InstallerAIR
> > application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit which
> can
> > contain only source.
> >
> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/
> >
> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> > available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/binaries/
> >
> > Along with the installer, we are releasing the 'badge installer' that can
> > be embedded in our site as well as third-party websites. Here is a
> preview:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/installer.html
> >
> > Before voting please review the section,
> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?" at
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Om & Erik
> > Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Leif Wells <le...@gmail.com>.
+1 Binding
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/9/12 7 :37PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Carol,
> >
> >I am not sure if this fixes "all" the problems. But when I diff the files
> >from svn trunk vs. the packaged source kit, I still see some a few .as and
> >.mxml files which seem different because of some reason.
>
> Then we should figure that out but this isn't holding up the installer
> release as far as I know is it? I still have lots of unread emails so I
> may find out in a bit.
>
>
No, its not a blocker for this release. We are still waiting for a third
IPMC vote.
Thanks,
Om
> Carol
>
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I believe these will fix all the problems:
> >>
> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf" encoding="UTF8"
> >> excludes="**/assets/**,**/*.ttf,**/*.png" fixlast="false"/>
> >>
> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix" encoding="UTF8"
> >> excludes="**/assets/**,**/*.ttf,**/*.png" fixlast="false"/>
> >>
> >> Note the addition of **/assets/** to excludes to cover the .ico files,
> >>the
> >> addition of encoding and the addition of fixlast.
> >>
> >> Carol
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/7/12 4 :44PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Dasa Paddock <dp...@esri.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I would try setting encoding="UTF8". I've found that this does fix
> >> >> problems like this on Windows.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >Bingo!
> >> >
> >> >Changing the tasks like this:
> >> >
> >> > <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
> >> >excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png" *encoding="UTF8"*/>
> >> >and
> >> ><fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
> >> >excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"
> >> >*encoding="UTF8"*/>
> >> >
> >> >fixed the issue.
> >> >
> >> >Apparently the encoding for the FixCRLF task defaults to the default
> >>JVM
> >> >encoding. I learn something new everyday here :-)
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Om
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> --Dasa
> >> >>
> >> >> On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 11/7/12 4 :03PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Removing these lines from the source-package task :
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
> >> >> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
> >> >> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I've been playing with this task as well.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You need this task to make the line endings match the type of the
> >>kit.
> >> >> > Even if the files had native line endings, you would need this
> >>unless
> >> >>you
> >> >> > want to make the Windows distro on a Windows system and the Mac
> >> >>distro on
> >> >> > a Mac.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > To make the EOF match you can add fixlast="false" since the
> >>default is
> >> >> > "true". This doesn't help with the encoding issue just the EOL at
> >>EOF
> >> >> > issue.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The task does has an encoding property you can play with. I don't
> >> >>have
> >> >> > the garbled problem when I produce the the kits on mac so there is
> >> >> nothing
> >> >> > for me to test.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Carol
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source
> >> >>kits.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about
> >> the
> >> >> >> mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> Om
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.
On 11/12/12 11 :03AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bd...@apache.org> wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...I am not sure if this fixes "all" the problems. But when I diff the
>>files
>> from svn trunk vs. the packaged source kit, I still see some a few .as
>>and
>> .mxml files which seem different because of some reason....
>
>Did you ignore whitespace differences? That's diff -b on unixish
>boxes, and if there's any end-of-line processing you might get slight
>differences which usually do not matter.
Last I knew there were no whitespace differences on OSX but apparently
there are still a few on Windows. If you ignore the whitespace
differences then both platforms are fine. We were trying to address
sebb's issue on incubator-general so that there is an exact match and
there is one less thing that can crop up as a blocker in the future.
Carol
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...I am not sure if this fixes "all" the problems. But when I diff the files
> from svn trunk vs. the packaged source kit, I still see some a few .as and
> .mxml files which seem different because of some reason....
Did you ignore whitespace differences? That's diff -b on unixish
boxes, and if there's any end-of-line processing you might get slight
differences which usually do not matter.
-Bertrand
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.
On 11/9/12 7 :37PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Carol,
>
>I am not sure if this fixes "all" the problems. But when I diff the files
>from svn trunk vs. the packaged source kit, I still see some a few .as and
>.mxml files which seem different because of some reason.
Then we should figure that out but this isn't holding up the installer
release as far as I know is it? I still have lots of unread emails so I
may find out in a bit.
Carol
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe these will fix all the problems:
>>
>> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf" encoding="UTF8"
>> excludes="**/assets/**,**/*.ttf,**/*.png" fixlast="false"/>
>>
>> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix" encoding="UTF8"
>> excludes="**/assets/**,**/*.ttf,**/*.png" fixlast="false"/>
>>
>> Note the addition of **/assets/** to excludes to cover the .ico files,
>>the
>> addition of encoding and the addition of fixlast.
>>
>> Carol
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/7/12 4 :44PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Dasa Paddock <dp...@esri.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I would try setting encoding="UTF8". I've found that this does fix
>> >> problems like this on Windows.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >Bingo!
>> >
>> >Changing the tasks like this:
>> >
>> > <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
>> >excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png" *encoding="UTF8"*/>
>> >and
>> ><fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
>> >excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"
>> >*encoding="UTF8"*/>
>> >
>> >fixed the issue.
>> >
>> >Apparently the encoding for the FixCRLF task defaults to the default
>>JVM
>> >encoding. I learn something new everyday here :-)
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Om
>> >
>> >
>> >> --Dasa
>> >>
>> >> On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 11/7/12 4 :03PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Removing these lines from the source-package task :
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
>> >> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
>> >> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
>> >> >
>> >> > I've been playing with this task as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > You need this task to make the line endings match the type of the
>>kit.
>> >> > Even if the files had native line endings, you would need this
>>unless
>> >>you
>> >> > want to make the Windows distro on a Windows system and the Mac
>> >>distro on
>> >> > a Mac.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > To make the EOF match you can add fixlast="false" since the
>>default is
>> >> > "true". This doesn't help with the encoding issue just the EOL at
>>EOF
>> >> > issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > The task does has an encoding property you can play with. I don't
>> >>have
>> >> > the garbled problem when I produce the the kits on mac so there is
>> >> nothing
>> >> > for me to test.
>> >> >
>> >> > Carol
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source
>> >>kits.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about
>> the
>> >> >> mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Om
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
Carol,
I am not sure if this fixes "all" the problems. But when I diff the files
from svn trunk vs. the packaged source kit, I still see some a few .as and
.mxml files which seem different because of some reason.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
> I believe these will fix all the problems:
>
> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf" encoding="UTF8"
> excludes="**/assets/**,**/*.ttf,**/*.png" fixlast="false"/>
>
> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix" encoding="UTF8"
> excludes="**/assets/**,**/*.ttf,**/*.png" fixlast="false"/>
>
> Note the addition of **/assets/** to excludes to cover the .ico files, the
> addition of encoding and the addition of fixlast.
>
> Carol
>
>
>
> On 11/7/12 4 :44PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Dasa Paddock <dp...@esri.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I would try setting encoding="UTF8". I've found that this does fix
> >> problems like this on Windows.
> >>
> >>
> >Bingo!
> >
> >Changing the tasks like this:
> >
> > <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
> >excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png" *encoding="UTF8"*/>
> >and
> ><fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
> >excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"
> >*encoding="UTF8"*/>
> >
> >fixed the issue.
> >
> >Apparently the encoding for the FixCRLF task defaults to the default JVM
> >encoding. I learn something new everyday here :-)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >
> >> --Dasa
> >>
> >> On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 11/7/12 4 :03PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Removing these lines from the source-package task :
> >> >>
> >> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
> >> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
> >> >>
> >> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
> >> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
> >> >
> >> > I've been playing with this task as well.
> >> >
> >> > You need this task to make the line endings match the type of the kit.
> >> > Even if the files had native line endings, you would need this unless
> >>you
> >> > want to make the Windows distro on a Windows system and the Mac
> >>distro on
> >> > a Mac.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > To make the EOF match you can add fixlast="false" since the default is
> >> > "true". This doesn't help with the encoding issue just the EOL at EOF
> >> > issue.
> >> >
> >> > The task does has an encoding property you can play with. I don't
> >>have
> >> > the garbled problem when I produce the the kits on mac so there is
> >> nothing
> >> > for me to test.
> >> >
> >> > Carol
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source
> >>kits.
> >> >>
> >> >> This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about
> the
> >> >> mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
> >> >>
> >> >> The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Om
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.
I believe these will fix all the problems:
<fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf" encoding="UTF8"
excludes="**/assets/**,**/*.ttf,**/*.png" fixlast="false"/>
<fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix" encoding="UTF8"
excludes="**/assets/**,**/*.ttf,**/*.png" fixlast="false"/>
Note the addition of **/assets/** to excludes to cover the .ico files, the
addition of encoding and the addition of fixlast.
Carol
On 11/7/12 4 :44PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Dasa Paddock <dp...@esri.com> wrote:
>
>> I would try setting encoding="UTF8". I've found that this does fix
>> problems like this on Windows.
>>
>>
>Bingo!
>
>Changing the tasks like this:
>
> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
>excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png" *encoding="UTF8"*/>
>and
><fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
>excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"
>*encoding="UTF8"*/>
>
>fixed the issue.
>
>Apparently the encoding for the FixCRLF task defaults to the default JVM
>encoding. I learn something new everyday here :-)
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>
>> --Dasa
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/7/12 4 :03PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Removing these lines from the source-package task :
>> >>
>> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
>> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
>> >>
>> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
>> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
>> >
>> > I've been playing with this task as well.
>> >
>> > You need this task to make the line endings match the type of the kit.
>> > Even if the files had native line endings, you would need this unless
>>you
>> > want to make the Windows distro on a Windows system and the Mac
>>distro on
>> > a Mac.
>> >
>> >
>> > To make the EOF match you can add fixlast="false" since the default is
>> > "true". This doesn't help with the encoding issue just the EOL at EOF
>> > issue.
>> >
>> > The task does has an encoding property you can play with. I don't
>>have
>> > the garbled problem when I produce the the kits on mac so there is
>> nothing
>> > for me to test.
>> >
>> > Carol
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source
>>kits.
>> >>
>> >> This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about the
>> >> mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
>> >>
>> >> The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Om
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Dasa Paddock <dp...@esri.com> wrote:
> I would try setting encoding="UTF8". I've found that this does fix
> problems like this on Windows.
>
>
Bingo!
Changing the tasks like this:
<fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png" *encoding="UTF8"*/>
and
<fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix" excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"
*encoding="UTF8"*/>
fixed the issue.
Apparently the encoding for the FixCRLF task defaults to the default JVM
encoding. I learn something new everyday here :-)
Thanks,
Om
> --Dasa
>
> On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 11/7/12 4 :03PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Removing these lines from the source-package task :
> >>
> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
> >>
> >> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
> >> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
> >
> > I've been playing with this task as well.
> >
> > You need this task to make the line endings match the type of the kit.
> > Even if the files had native line endings, you would need this unless you
> > want to make the Windows distro on a Windows system and the Mac distro on
> > a Mac.
> >
> >
> > To make the EOF match you can add fixlast="false" since the default is
> > "true". This doesn't help with the encoding issue just the EOL at EOF
> > issue.
> >
> > The task does has an encoding property you can play with. I don't have
> > the garbled problem when I produce the the kits on mac so there is
> nothing
> > for me to test.
> >
> > Carol
> >
> >
> >>
> >> seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source kits.
> >>
> >> This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about the
> >> mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
> >>
> >> The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Dasa Paddock <dp...@esri.com>.
I would try setting encoding="UTF8". I've found that this does fix problems like this on Windows.
--Dasa
On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/7/12 4 :03PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Removing these lines from the source-package task :
>>
>> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
>> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
>>
>> <fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
>> excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
>
> I've been playing with this task as well.
>
> You need this task to make the line endings match the type of the kit.
> Even if the files had native line endings, you would need this unless you
> want to make the Windows distro on a Windows system and the Mac distro on
> a Mac.
>
>
> To make the EOF match you can add fixlast="false" since the default is
> "true". This doesn't help with the encoding issue just the EOL at EOF
> issue.
>
> The task does has an encoding property you can play with. I don't have
> the garbled problem when I produce the the kits on mac so there is nothing
> for me to test.
>
> Carol
>
>
>>
>> seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source kits.
>>
>> This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about the
>> mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
>>
>> The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.
On 11/7/12 4 :03PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Removing these lines from the source-package task :
>
><fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
>excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
>
><fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
>excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
I've been playing with this task as well.
You need this task to make the line endings match the type of the kit.
Even if the files had native line endings, you would need this unless you
want to make the Windows distro on a Windows system and the Mac distro on
a Mac.
To make the EOF match you can add fixlast="false" since the default is
"true". This doesn't help with the encoding issue just the EOL at EOF
issue.
The task does has an encoding property you can play with. I don't have
the garbled problem when I produce the the kits on mac so there is nothing
for me to test.
Carol
>
>seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source kits.
>
>This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about the
>mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
>
>The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
>
>Thanks,
>Om
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
Removing these lines from the source-package task :
<fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="crlf"
excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
<fixcrlf srcdir="${BUILD_DIR}/temp" eol="unix"
excludes="**/*.ttf,**/*.png"/>
seems to have fixed this issue for both the zip and tar.gz source kits.
This would also fix the other issue raised on general@i.a.o about the
mismatch between eof eol in the src kit vs. release tag.
The question is - what are the other repercussions of this change?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Some folks seem to think that whatever source we release needs to also be
> in
> Apache SVN. For this file it isn't quite true. But yes, I agree that it
> doesn't affect functionality.
>
>
> On 11/7/12 12:51 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
> wrote:
> >
> >> To be blunt: this "blocking issue" seems not to affect the
> functionality of
> >> the software in any way. So how can it be "blocking"?
> >>
> >> EdB
> >>
> >>
> > Alex raised the same exact question on general and we are awaiting an
> > answer. In the mean time, I am trying to figure out what caused this
> issue
> > and how we can solve it.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> And to be fair, I went back and looked at all the Release Candiates
> till
> >>> date (RC1 through RC10) and the same mangled text problem in
> >>> installer/src/org/apache/flex/packageflexsdk/resource/RuntimeLocale.as
> >>> exists in all the source packages.
> >>>
> >>> I dont think we would have caught this issue even if the vote went on
> for
> >>> 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Om
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Here is the thread:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-1.0.9-incubati
> >> ng-to34650778.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Its going on on general@incubator.apache.org. It would be good to
> >>>> subscribe to that list.
> >>>>
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> What potential blocker? I think I'm missing something...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> EdB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as
> >> there
> >>>>> are
> >>>>>>> more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With
> >> no
> >>>>>>> changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last
> >>>>> time, it
> >>>>>>> was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he
> >>> was
> >>>>>> right
> >>>>>>> (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the
> >> VOTE
> >>> on
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
> >>>>>> True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours.
> >> We
> >>>>> don't
> >>>>>> want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in
> >> order.
> >>>>> Now
> >>>>>> we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may
> >>> need
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>> withdraw again.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Alex Harui
> >>>>>> Flex SDK Team
> >>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>
> >>>>> T. 06-51952295
> >>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>
> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>
> >> T. 06-51952295
> >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Some folks seem to think that whatever source we release needs to also be in
Apache SVN. For this file it isn't quite true. But yes, I agree that it
doesn't affect functionality.
On 11/7/12 12:51 PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>> To be blunt: this "blocking issue" seems not to affect the functionality of
>> the software in any way. So how can it be "blocking"?
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
> Alex raised the same exact question on general and we are awaiting an
> answer. In the mean time, I am trying to figure out what caused this issue
> and how we can solve it.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And to be fair, I went back and looked at all the Release Candiates till
>>> date (RC1 through RC10) and the same mangled text problem in
>>> installer/src/org/apache/flex/packageflexsdk/resource/RuntimeLocale.as
>>> exists in all the source packages.
>>>
>>> I dont think we would have caught this issue even if the vote went on for
>>> 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is the thread:
>>>>
>>>
>> http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-1.0.9-incubati
>> ng-to34650778.html
>>>>
>>>> Its going on on general@incubator.apache.org. It would be good to
>>>> subscribe to that list.
>>>>
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What potential blocker? I think I'm missing something...
>>>>>
>>>>> EdB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as
>> there
>>>>> are
>>>>>>> more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With
>> no
>>>>>>> changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last
>>>>> time, it
>>>>>>> was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he
>>> was
>>>>>> right
>>>>>>> (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the
>> VOTE
>>> on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
>>>>>> True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours.
>> We
>>>>> don't
>>>>>> want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in
>> order.
>>>>> Now
>>>>>> we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may
>>> need
>>>>> to
>>>>>> withdraw again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>
>>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295
>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> To be blunt: this "blocking issue" seems not to affect the functionality of
> the software in any way. So how can it be "blocking"?
>
> EdB
>
>
Alex raised the same exact question on general and we are awaiting an
answer. In the mean time, I am trying to figure out what caused this issue
and how we can solve it.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > And to be fair, I went back and looked at all the Release Candiates till
> > date (RC1 through RC10) and the same mangled text problem in
> > installer/src/org/apache/flex/packageflexsdk/resource/RuntimeLocale.as
> > exists in all the source packages.
> >
> > I dont think we would have caught this issue even if the vote went on for
> > 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is the thread:
> > >
> >
> http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-1.0.9-incubating-to34650778.html
> > >
> > > Its going on on general@incubator.apache.org. It would be good to
> > > subscribe to that list.
> > >
> > > Om
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> What potential blocker? I think I'm missing something...
> > >>
> > >> EdB
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as
> there
> > >> are
> > >> > > more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With
> no
> > >> > > changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last
> > >> time, it
> > >> > > was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he
> > was
> > >> > right
> > >> > > (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the
> VOTE
> > on
> > >> > the
> > >> > > IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
> > >> > True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours.
> We
> > >> don't
> > >> > want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in
> order.
> > >> Now
> > >> > we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may
> > need
> > >> to
> > >> > withdraw again.
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Alex Harui
> > >> > Flex SDK Team
> > >> > Adobe Systems, Inc.
> > >> > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Ix Multimedia Software
> > >>
> > >> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > >> 3521 VB Utrecht
> > >>
> > >> T. 06-51952295
> > >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
To be blunt: this "blocking issue" seems not to affect the functionality of
the software in any way. So how can it be "blocking"?
EdB
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And to be fair, I went back and looked at all the Release Candiates till
> date (RC1 through RC10) and the same mangled text problem in
> installer/src/org/apache/flex/packageflexsdk/resource/RuntimeLocale.as
> exists in all the source packages.
>
> I dont think we would have caught this issue even if the vote went on for
> 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Here is the thread:
> >
> http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-1.0.9-incubating-to34650778.html
> >
> > Its going on on general@incubator.apache.org. It would be good to
> > subscribe to that list.
> >
> > Om
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>
> wrote:
> >
> >> What potential blocker? I think I'm missing something...
> >>
> >> EdB
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as there
> >> are
> >> > > more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With no
> >> > > changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last
> >> time, it
> >> > > was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he
> was
> >> > right
> >> > > (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the VOTE
> on
> >> > the
> >> > > IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
> >> > True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours. We
> >> don't
> >> > want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in order.
> >> Now
> >> > we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may
> need
> >> to
> >> > withdraw again.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Alex Harui
> >> > Flex SDK Team
> >> > Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >> > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>
> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>
> >> T. 06-51952295
> >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
And to be fair, I went back and looked at all the Release Candiates till
date (RC1 through RC10) and the same mangled text problem in
installer/src/org/apache/flex/packageflexsdk/resource/RuntimeLocale.as
exists in all the source packages.
I dont think we would have caught this issue even if the vote went on for
72 hours.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is the thread:
> http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-1.0.9-incubating-to34650778.html
>
> Its going on on general@incubator.apache.org. It would be good to
> subscribe to that list.
>
> Om
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>> What potential blocker? I think I'm missing something...
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as there
>> are
>> > > more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With no
>> > > changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last
>> time, it
>> > > was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he was
>> > right
>> > > (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the VOTE on
>> > the
>> > > IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
>> > True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours. We
>> don't
>> > want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in order.
>> Now
>> > we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may need
>> to
>> > withdraw again.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alex Harui
>> > Flex SDK Team
>> > Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295
>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
Here is the thread:
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-1.0.9-incubating-to34650778.html
Its going on on general@incubator.apache.org. It would be good to
subscribe to that list.
Om
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> What potential blocker? I think I'm missing something...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as there are
> > > more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With no
> > > changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last time,
> it
> > > was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he was
> > right
> > > (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the VOTE on
> > the
> > > IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
> > True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours. We
> don't
> > want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in order.
> Now
> > we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may need
> to
> > withdraw again.
> >
> > --
> > Alex Harui
> > Flex SDK Team
> > Adobe Systems, Inc.
> > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
What potential blocker? I think I'm missing something...
EdB
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
> > Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as there are
> > more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With no
> > changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last time, it
> > was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he was
> right
> > (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the VOTE on
> the
> > IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
> True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours. We don't
> want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in order. Now
> we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may need to
> withdraw again.
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 11/7/12 10:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as there are
> more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With no
> changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last time, it
> was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he was right
> (in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the VOTE on the
> IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
True, but somewhere else it said that votes should take 72 hours. We don't
want to push on the overtaxed IPMC without having our house in order. Now
we have a potential blocker with the RuntimeLocale.as file and may need to
withdraw again.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Well, technically a -1 doesn't veto a release [1]. As long as there are
more positive than negative votes, the release can go ahead. With no
changes to the code, and since the VOTE on this list passed last time, it
was safe for Om to assume that the vote would pass again. IMHO he was right
(in the spirit if not the letter of the rules) to expedite the VOTE on the
IPMC list. We all want to release this and move on.
EdB
1: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/6/12 11 :15PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
> >+1 on Om's expedited release procedure.
>
> I don't agree. I think less than 24 hours was not cool. I struggled all
> morning (San Francisco time) to build, install and check out the kit.
> Before I was even finished the vote was closed. Yes you had 3 +1s but
> there still could have been -1s.
>
> Carol
>
> >
> >EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Given that we have voted on this so many times already, I dint see a
> >>need
> >> for another 72 hour window. But I will keep this voting thread open
> >>and if
> >> the Release Candidate gets more -1s than +1s, I will pull the vote
> >>thread
> >> from general@i.a.o.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >> > Om,
> >> >
> >> > I think this is premature. The vote has to be open for 72 hours [1].
> >> >
> >> > Carol
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-releas
> >>e-
> >> > manager
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 11/6/12 12 :22PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >The vote passes with the following results:
> >> > >
> >> > >+1 Binding:
> >> > >Erik de Bruin
> >> > >Alex Harui
> >> > >Greg Reddin (Mentor/IPMC)
> >> > >Om
> >> > >
> >> > >+1 Non-binding:
> >> > >Roland Zwaga
> >> > >Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz
> >> > >
> >> > >I will start a vote thread on general@incubator.apache.org now.
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks to everyone who voted!
> >> > >
> >> > >Regards,
> >> > >Om
> >> > >
> >> > >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> +1 (binding)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Signature ok.
> >> > >> Rat ok.
> >> > >> Source built.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 11/6/12 12:01 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > We received feedback on general@incubator.apache.org regarding
> >>RC9.
> >> > >> Here
> >> > >> > is the email thread for that vote thread:
> >> > >> > http://markmail.org/thread/yx263i737qtfbszf
> >> > >> > We have fixed all these issues in this Release Candidate.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 1. Incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
> >> > >> > 2. Incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE
> >>file
> >> > >> > 3. Incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> >> > >> > 4. Incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> >> > >> > 5. In the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at
> >> root
> >> > >>but
> >> > >> > in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them
> >>up to
> >> > >>root
> >> > >> > when we packaged everything.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > This is the first official release of the Apache Flex SDK
> >> InstallerAIR
> >> > >> > application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit
> >> which
> >> > >> can
> >> > >> > contain only source.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
> >> > >>platforms,
> >> > >> > available here:
> >> > >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/binaries/
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Along with the installer, we are releasing the 'badge installer'
> >> that
> >> > >>can
> >> > >> > be embedded in our site as well as third-party websites. Here
> >>is a
> >> > >> preview:
> >> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/installer.html
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Before voting please review the section,
> >> > >> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?" at
> >> > >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> > >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Regards,
> >> > >> > Om & Erik
> >> > >> > Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Alex Harui
> >> > >> Flex SDK Team
> >> > >> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >> > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> >T. 06-51952295
> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/6/12 11 :15PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>> >+1 on Om's expedited release procedure.
>>
>> I don't agree. I think less than 24 hours was not cool. I struggled all
>> morning (San Francisco time) to build, install and check out the kit.
>> Before I was even finished the vote was closed. Yes you had 3 +1s but
>> there still could have been -1s.
>>
>>
> My bad. Sorry.
>
Just to be clear, hereafter I will make sure that I give at least 72 hours
for a vote. And if at all I need to expedite a vote, I will first ask if
anyone else is planning to vote. Sorry for wasting your time.
Om
>
>
>> Carol
>>
>> >
>> >EdB
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Given that we have voted on this so many times already, I dint see a
>> >>need
>> >> for another 72 hour window. But I will keep this voting thread open
>> >>and if
>> >> the Release Candidate gets more -1s than +1s, I will pull the vote
>> >>thread
>> >> from general@i.a.o.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Om
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Om,
>> >> >
>> >> > I think this is premature. The vote has to be open for 72 hours [1].
>> >> >
>> >> > Carol
>> >> >
>> >> > [1]
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-releas
>> >>e-
>> >> > manager
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 11/6/12 12 :22PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >The vote passes with the following results:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >+1 Binding:
>> >> > >Erik de Bruin
>> >> > >Alex Harui
>> >> > >Greg Reddin (Mentor/IPMC)
>> >> > >Om
>> >> > >
>> >> > >+1 Non-binding:
>> >> > >Roland Zwaga
>> >> > >Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz
>> >> > >
>> >> > >I will start a vote thread on general@incubator.apache.org now.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >Thanks to everyone who voted!
>> >> > >
>> >> > >Regards,
>> >> > >Om
>> >> > >
>> >> > >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> +1 (binding)
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Signature ok.
>> >> > >> Rat ok.
>> >> > >> Source built.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On 11/6/12 12:01 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > We received feedback on general@incubator.apache.org regarding
>> >>RC9.
>> >> > >> Here
>> >> > >> > is the email thread for that vote thread:
>> >> > >> > http://markmail.org/thread/yx263i737qtfbszf
>> >> > >> > We have fixed all these issues in this Release Candidate.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > 1. Incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
>> >> > >> > 2. Incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE
>> >>file
>> >> > >> > 3. Incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
>> >> > >> > 4. Incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
>> >> > >> > 5. In the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at
>> >> root
>> >> > >>but
>> >> > >> > in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them
>> >>up to
>> >> > >>root
>> >> > >> > when we packaged everything.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > This is the first official release of the Apache Flex SDK
>> >> InstallerAIR
>> >> > >> > application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit
>> >> which
>> >> > >> can
>> >> > >> > contain only source.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
>> >> > >>platforms,
>> >> > >> > available here:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/binaries/
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Along with the installer, we are releasing the 'badge installer'
>> >> that
>> >> > >>can
>> >> > >> > be embedded in our site as well as third-party websites. Here
>> >>is a
>> >> > >> preview:
>> >> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/installer.html
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Before voting please review the section,
>> >> > >> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?" at
>> >> > >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> >> > >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Regards,
>> >> > >> > Om & Erik
>> >> > >> > Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> --
>> >> > >> Alex Harui
>> >> > >> Flex SDK Team
>> >> > >> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> >> > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Ix Multimedia Software
>> >
>> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >3521 VB Utrecht
>> >
>> >T. 06-51952295
>> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/6/12 11 :15PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
> >+1 on Om's expedited release procedure.
>
> I don't agree. I think less than 24 hours was not cool. I struggled all
> morning (San Francisco time) to build, install and check out the kit.
> Before I was even finished the vote was closed. Yes you had 3 +1s but
> there still could have been -1s.
>
>
My bad. Sorry.
> Carol
>
> >
> >EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Given that we have voted on this so many times already, I dint see a
> >>need
> >> for another 72 hour window. But I will keep this voting thread open
> >>and if
> >> the Release Candidate gets more -1s than +1s, I will pull the vote
> >>thread
> >> from general@i.a.o.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >> > Om,
> >> >
> >> > I think this is premature. The vote has to be open for 72 hours [1].
> >> >
> >> > Carol
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-releas
> >>e-
> >> > manager
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 11/6/12 12 :22PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >The vote passes with the following results:
> >> > >
> >> > >+1 Binding:
> >> > >Erik de Bruin
> >> > >Alex Harui
> >> > >Greg Reddin (Mentor/IPMC)
> >> > >Om
> >> > >
> >> > >+1 Non-binding:
> >> > >Roland Zwaga
> >> > >Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz
> >> > >
> >> > >I will start a vote thread on general@incubator.apache.org now.
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks to everyone who voted!
> >> > >
> >> > >Regards,
> >> > >Om
> >> > >
> >> > >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> +1 (binding)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Signature ok.
> >> > >> Rat ok.
> >> > >> Source built.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 11/6/12 12:01 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > We received feedback on general@incubator.apache.org regarding
> >>RC9.
> >> > >> Here
> >> > >> > is the email thread for that vote thread:
> >> > >> > http://markmail.org/thread/yx263i737qtfbszf
> >> > >> > We have fixed all these issues in this Release Candidate.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 1. Incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
> >> > >> > 2. Incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE
> >>file
> >> > >> > 3. Incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> >> > >> > 4. Incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> >> > >> > 5. In the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at
> >> root
> >> > >>but
> >> > >> > in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them
> >>up to
> >> > >>root
> >> > >> > when we packaged everything.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > This is the first official release of the Apache Flex SDK
> >> InstallerAIR
> >> > >> > application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit
> >> which
> >> > >> can
> >> > >> > contain only source.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
> >> > >>platforms,
> >> > >> > available here:
> >> > >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/binaries/
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Along with the installer, we are releasing the 'badge installer'
> >> that
> >> > >>can
> >> > >> > be embedded in our site as well as third-party websites. Here
> >>is a
> >> > >> preview:
> >> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/installer.html
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Before voting please review the section,
> >> > >> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?" at
> >> > >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> > >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Regards,
> >> > >> > Om & Erik
> >> > >> > Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Alex Harui
> >> > >> Flex SDK Team
> >> > >> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >> > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> >T. 06-51952295
> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.
On 11/6/12 11 :15PM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>+1 on Om's expedited release procedure.
I don't agree. I think less than 24 hours was not cool. I struggled all
morning (San Francisco time) to build, install and check out the kit.
Before I was even finished the vote was closed. Yes you had 3 +1s but
there still could have been -1s.
Carol
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Given that we have voted on this so many times already, I dint see a
>>need
>> for another 72 hour window. But I will keep this voting thread open
>>and if
>> the Release Candidate gets more -1s than +1s, I will pull the vote
>>thread
>> from general@i.a.o.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>> > Om,
>> >
>> > I think this is premature. The vote has to be open for 72 hours [1].
>> >
>> > Carol
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>>
>>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-releas
>>e-
>> > manager
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/6/12 12 :22PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >The vote passes with the following results:
>> > >
>> > >+1 Binding:
>> > >Erik de Bruin
>> > >Alex Harui
>> > >Greg Reddin (Mentor/IPMC)
>> > >Om
>> > >
>> > >+1 Non-binding:
>> > >Roland Zwaga
>> > >Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz
>> > >
>> > >I will start a vote thread on general@incubator.apache.org now.
>> > >
>> > >Thanks to everyone who voted!
>> > >
>> > >Regards,
>> > >Om
>> > >
>> > >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> +1 (binding)
>> > >>
>> > >> Signature ok.
>> > >> Rat ok.
>> > >> Source built.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On 11/6/12 12:01 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
>> > >> >
>> > >> > We received feedback on general@incubator.apache.org regarding
>>RC9.
>> > >> Here
>> > >> > is the email thread for that vote thread:
>> > >> > http://markmail.org/thread/yx263i737qtfbszf
>> > >> > We have fixed all these issues in this Release Candidate.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > 1. Incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
>> > >> > 2. Incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE
>>file
>> > >> > 3. Incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
>> > >> > 4. Incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
>> > >> > 5. In the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at
>> root
>> > >>but
>> > >> > in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them
>>up to
>> > >>root
>> > >> > when we packaged everything.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > This is the first official release of the Apache Flex SDK
>> InstallerAIR
>> > >> > application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit
>> which
>> > >> can
>> > >> > contain only source.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/
>> > >> >
>> > >> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
>> > >>platforms,
>> > >> > available here:
>> > >> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/binaries/
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Along with the installer, we are releasing the 'badge installer'
>> that
>> > >>can
>> > >> > be embedded in our site as well as third-party websites. Here
>>is a
>> > >> preview:
>> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/installer.html
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Before voting please review the section,
>> > >> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?" at
>> > >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Regards,
>> > >> > Om & Erik
>> > >> > Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Alex Harui
>> > >> Flex SDK Team
>> > >> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
+1 on Om's expedited release procedure.
EdB
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Om <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given that we have voted on this so many times already, I dint see a need
> for another 72 hour window. But I will keep this voting thread open and if
> the Release Candidate gets more -1s than +1s, I will pull the vote thread
> from general@i.a.o.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Om,
> >
> > I think this is premature. The vote has to be open for 72 hours [1].
> >
> > Carol
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-release-
> > manager
> >
> >
> > On 11/6/12 12 :22PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >The vote passes with the following results:
> > >
> > >+1 Binding:
> > >Erik de Bruin
> > >Alex Harui
> > >Greg Reddin (Mentor/IPMC)
> > >Om
> > >
> > >+1 Non-binding:
> > >Roland Zwaga
> > >Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz
> > >
> > >I will start a vote thread on general@incubator.apache.org now.
> > >
> > >Thanks to everyone who voted!
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Om
> > >
> > >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> Signature ok.
> > >> Rat ok.
> > >> Source built.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 11/6/12 12:01 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
> > >> >
> > >> > We received feedback on general@incubator.apache.org regarding RC9.
> > >> Here
> > >> > is the email thread for that vote thread:
> > >> > http://markmail.org/thread/yx263i737qtfbszf
> > >> > We have fixed all these issues in this Release Candidate.
> > >> >
> > >> > 1. Incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
> > >> > 2. Incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file
> > >> > 3. Incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> > >> > 4. Incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> > >> > 5. In the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at
> root
> > >>but
> > >> > in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to
> > >>root
> > >> > when we packaged everything.
> > >> >
> > >> > This is the first official release of the Apache Flex SDK
> InstallerAIR
> > >> > application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit
> which
> > >> can
> > >> > contain only source.
> > >> >
> > >> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/
> > >> >
> > >> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
> > >>platforms,
> > >> > available here:
> > >> >
> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/binaries/
> > >> >
> > >> > Along with the installer, we are releasing the 'badge installer'
> that
> > >>can
> > >> > be embedded in our site as well as third-party websites. Here is a
> > >> preview:
> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/installer.html
> > >> >
> > >> > Before voting please review the section,
> > >> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?" at
> > >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > >> >
> > >> > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> > Om & Erik
> > >> > Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Alex Harui
> > >> Flex SDK Team
> > >> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
Given that we have voted on this so many times already, I dint see a need
for another 72 hour window. But I will keep this voting thread open and if
the Release Candidate gets more -1s than +1s, I will pull the vote thread
from general@i.a.o.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Om,
>
> I think this is premature. The vote has to be open for 72 hours [1].
>
> Carol
>
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-release-
> manager
>
>
> On 11/6/12 12 :22PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >The vote passes with the following results:
> >
> >+1 Binding:
> >Erik de Bruin
> >Alex Harui
> >Greg Reddin (Mentor/IPMC)
> >Om
> >
> >+1 Non-binding:
> >Roland Zwaga
> >Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz
> >
> >I will start a vote thread on general@incubator.apache.org now.
> >
> >Thanks to everyone who voted!
> >
> >Regards,
> >Om
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Signature ok.
> >> Rat ok.
> >> Source built.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/6/12 12:01 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
> >> >
> >> > We received feedback on general@incubator.apache.org regarding RC9.
> >> Here
> >> > is the email thread for that vote thread:
> >> > http://markmail.org/thread/yx263i737qtfbszf
> >> > We have fixed all these issues in this Release Candidate.
> >> >
> >> > 1. Incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
> >> > 2. Incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file
> >> > 3. Incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> >> > 4. Incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> >> > 5. In the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root
> >>but
> >> > in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to
> >>root
> >> > when we packaged everything.
> >> >
> >> > This is the first official release of the Apache Flex SDK InstallerAIR
> >> > application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit which
> >> can
> >> > contain only source.
> >> >
> >> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/
> >> >
> >> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
> >>platforms,
> >> > available here:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/binaries/
> >> >
> >> > Along with the installer, we are releasing the 'badge installer' that
> >>can
> >> > be embedded in our site as well as third-party websites. Here is a
> >> preview:
> >> > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/installer.html
> >> >
> >> > Before voting please review the section,
> >> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?" at
> >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> >
> >> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Om & Erik
> >> > Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alex Harui
> >> Flex SDK Team
> >> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC10
Posted by Carol Frampton <cf...@adobe.com>.
Om,
I think this is premature. The vote has to be open for 72 hours [1].
Carol
[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-release-
manager
On 11/6/12 12 :22PM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The vote passes with the following results:
>
>+1 Binding:
>Erik de Bruin
>Alex Harui
>Greg Reddin (Mentor/IPMC)
>Om
>
>+1 Non-binding:
>Roland Zwaga
>Miguel Martín-Forero Ruiz
>
>I will start a vote thread on general@incubator.apache.org now.
>
>Thanks to everyone who voted!
>
>Regards,
>Om
>
>On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Signature ok.
>> Rat ok.
>> Source built.
>>
>>
>> On 11/6/12 12:01 AM, "Om" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
>> >
>> > We received feedback on general@incubator.apache.org regarding RC9.
>> Here
>> > is the email thread for that vote thread:
>> > http://markmail.org/thread/yx263i737qtfbszf
>> > We have fixed all these issues in this Release Candidate.
>> >
>> > 1. Incorrect headers in MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as
>> > 2. Incorrect path to MD5Stream.as and IntUtil.as in the LICENSE file
>> > 3. Incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
>> > 4. Incorrect path to the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
>> > 5. In the distro the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files are at root
>>but
>> > in svn they are under the installer directory - we pulled them up to
>>root
>> > when we packaged everything.
>> >
>> > This is the first official release of the Apache Flex SDK InstallerAIR
>> > application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit which
>> can
>> > contain only source.
>> >
>> > The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/
>> >
>> > The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
>>platforms,
>> > available here:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC10/binaries/
>> >
>> > Along with the installer, we are releasing the 'badge installer' that
>>can
>> > be embedded in our site as well as third-party websites. Here is a
>> preview:
>> > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/installer.html
>> >
>> > Before voting please review the section,
>> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?" at
>> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Om & Erik
>> > Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>