You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Wes McKinney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/07/31 19:27:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-187) [C++] Decide on how pedantic we want to be about exceptions

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16107828#comment-16107828 ] 

Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-187:
------------------------------------

PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/917

> [C++] Decide on how pedantic we want to be about exceptions
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-187
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-187
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Micah Kornfield
>            Assignee: Wes McKinney
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>
> We currently have code sprinkled around constructors that can technically fail because we either do a memcpy/allocation via vector copy constructor (we might be using a move constructor in places) and make_shared<>.
> These are very small memory allocations but they can throw std::bad_alloc.
> Technically, we would need to convert these to use Init or static factories.
> (types.h is one place to look)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)