You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "mingleizhang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/05/16 14:34:04 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-6381) Unnecessary synchronized object in BucketingSink

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

mingleizhang updated FLINK-6381:
--------------------------------
    Summary: Unnecessary synchronized object in BucketingSink  (was: Unnecessary synchronizing object in BucketingSink)

> Unnecessary synchronized object in BucketingSink
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6381
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6381
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: filesystem-connector
>            Reporter: mingleizhang
>            Assignee: mingleizhang
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> It seems that currently there are two places should not employ the {{synchronized}} to describe {{pendingFilesPerCheckpoint}}, as it is only restored state object for checkpoint and no sharing of the data-structure between different threads, as follows. {code} private void handleRestoredRollingSinkState(RollingSink.BucketState restoredState) {
>      ...
>     synchronized (restoredState.pendingFilesPerCheckpoint) {
> 			restoredState.pendingFilesPerCheckpoint.clear();
> 		}
>      ...
> }{code} and {code}private void handleRestoredBucketState(State<T> restoredState) {       
>     ...
>     synchronized (bucketState.pendingFilesPerCheckpoint) {
> 	     	        bucketState.pendingFilesPerCheckpoint.clear();
> 		}
>  } {code}
> Hi, [~kkl0u]. Is there any other stuff shoud add here ? Would you mind have a more thorough look in this class ? 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)