You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com> on 2017/08/25 20:04:23 UTC

[VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Hi all

This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
candidate 3.

Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.

Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>


Result thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>


The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>


The release tag can be found here: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>


The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be found here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>


Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549


KEY files are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>


For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>


The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,

Sorry the send button got pressed a bit too quickly there.

+1 (binding) but there a few outstanding things that need to be fixed IMO before the next release.

I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE may have wrong year range (should only be 2017?)
- LICENSE has some minor issues and missing a few permissive licenses
- There’s a number of issue with headers on files with a large number of files missing the standard ASF header or an Apache license header. Please fix for next release.
- Didn’t try to compile as there’s doesn’t seem to be any instruction on how to do so. Would be nice if this was provided in the README.

License is missing
- BSD license for this file [4]
- MIT licensed JQuery and Sizzle.js [5]
- This BSD licensed file [6]
- Boost Software licensed file [7]
- This BSD licensed files [8][9]

Some minor issues:
- While a number of file (around 50 odd) do have "Copyright (c) 2016 by Contributors” they don’t have a full Apache licensed header please fix this in the next release. More files exist with other years and without the correct header.
- This license file may be a little misleading [1] where its apache license but also claims “All rights reserved”. I notice this in a number of other places as well.
- A number of Apache licenses have incorrect appendixes with the copyright line filled in e.g. [2]
- This file may incorrect have an ASF header on it [3]

Also the README has a large number of links to http://mxnet.io I assume this will be changed during incubation?

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/LICENSE
2../dlpack/LICENSE
3. ./example/image-classification/predict-cpp/image-classification-predict.cc
4. ./docs/_static/searchtools_custom.js
5. ./docs/_static/jquery-1.11.1.js
6.  ./cub/test/mersenne.h
7. ./cmake/Modules/FindJeMalloc.cmake
8. ./dmlc-core/cmake/Modules/FindCrypto.cmake
9. ./nnvm/dmlc-core/cmake/Modules/FindCrypto.cmake




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Sebastian <ss...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)

On 30.08.2017 07:37, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1 (binding) to the release.
> 
> Minor items (fix next release):
> 
> * R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README
> could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside
> of Apache).
> * Agreed with Justin that there needs to be a Getting Started text file of
> some kind. This could be a link from the README.md to the docs/get_started
> directory perhaps; though .md format isn't the easiest to read (ie: link to
> website and over time we should consider whether a local version is needed).
> * CONTRIBUTORS.md calls the project DMLC/MXNet.
> * The NEWS.md refers to 0.11.0-rc3 as the latest version. This should refer
> to the version being released rather than the rc3.
> * The README.md also refers to rc3. It shouldn't refer to rc3 as a release,
> and ideally it would refer to 0.11.0 as a release (though tricky to be
> forward looking given that GitHub treats that as a homepage). Randomly
> noting that the What's New should be dated.
> * The README.md refers to the copyright being owned by Contributors. Needs
> updating to a license statement (with NOTICE handling the copyright side of
> things).
> 
> There's a lot of continual cleanup to do here; but given that this is a
> project that has previously been released (pre-apache), and many of these
> items are an issue in the old version (ie: existing users have already
> dealt with things like no direct link from download to how to get
> started/build etc), I don't see anything blocking.
> 
> Hen
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all
>>
>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
>> candidate 3.
>>
>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>>
>> Vote thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>
>>
>> Result thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>
>>
>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
>>
>>
>> The release tag can be found here:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>>
>>
>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be
>> found here:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>>
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>>
>>
>> KEY files are available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
>>
>>
>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
It looks like the request to vote on the release by the Incubator PMC was made on Friday August 25.

This vote has been open more than 72 hours after the [VOTE] thread was opened. 

So it looks like you are good to release.

Regards,

Craig

> On Aug 30, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Dominic Divakaruni <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> + dev@
> This is great feedback. Thanks to the PMC for reviewing. Megna is on point
> to track all this feedback, capture action items on the wiki and Jira..
> 
> Overall it looks like we have 3 binding +1's.
> 
> Are we good to proceed with making the release official?
> 
> Best,
> Dom
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding) to the release.
>> 
>> Minor items (fix next release):
>> 
>> * R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README
>> could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside
>> of Apache).
>> * Agreed with Justin that there needs to be a Getting Started text file of
>> some kind. This could be a link from the README.md to the docs/get_started
>> directory perhaps; though .md format isn't the easiest to read (ie: link to
>> website and over time we should consider whether a local version is
>> needed).
>> * CONTRIBUTORS.md calls the project DMLC/MXNet.
>> * The NEWS.md refers to 0.11.0-rc3 as the latest version. This should refer
>> to the version being released rather than the rc3.
>> * The README.md also refers to rc3. It shouldn't refer to rc3 as a release,
>> and ideally it would refer to 0.11.0 as a release (though tricky to be
>> forward looking given that GitHub treats that as a homepage). Randomly
>> noting that the What's New should be dated.
>> * The README.md refers to the copyright being owned by Contributors. Needs
>> updating to a license statement (with NOTICE handling the copyright side of
>> things).
>> 
>> There's a lot of continual cleanup to do here; but given that this is a
>> project that has previously been released (pre-apache), and many of these
>> items are an issue in the old version (ie: existing users have already
>> dealt with things like no direct link from download to how to get
>> started/build etc), I don't see anything blocking.
>> 
>> Hen
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all
>>> 
>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
>>> candidate 3.
>>> 
>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>>> 
>>> Vote thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Result thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The release tag can be found here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be
>>> found here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>>> 
>>> 
>>> KEY files are available here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Dominic Divakaruni
> 206.475.9200 Cell

Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
It looks like the request to vote on the release by the Incubator PMC was made on Friday August 25.

This vote has been open more than 72 hours after the [VOTE] thread was opened. 

So it looks like you are good to release.

Regards,

Craig

> On Aug 30, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Dominic Divakaruni <do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> + dev@
> This is great feedback. Thanks to the PMC for reviewing. Megna is on point
> to track all this feedback, capture action items on the wiki and Jira..
> 
> Overall it looks like we have 3 binding +1's.
> 
> Are we good to proceed with making the release official?
> 
> Best,
> Dom
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding) to the release.
>> 
>> Minor items (fix next release):
>> 
>> * R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README
>> could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside
>> of Apache).
>> * Agreed with Justin that there needs to be a Getting Started text file of
>> some kind. This could be a link from the README.md to the docs/get_started
>> directory perhaps; though .md format isn't the easiest to read (ie: link to
>> website and over time we should consider whether a local version is
>> needed).
>> * CONTRIBUTORS.md calls the project DMLC/MXNet.
>> * The NEWS.md refers to 0.11.0-rc3 as the latest version. This should refer
>> to the version being released rather than the rc3.
>> * The README.md also refers to rc3. It shouldn't refer to rc3 as a release,
>> and ideally it would refer to 0.11.0 as a release (though tricky to be
>> forward looking given that GitHub treats that as a homepage). Randomly
>> noting that the What's New should be dated.
>> * The README.md refers to the copyright being owned by Contributors. Needs
>> updating to a license statement (with NOTICE handling the copyright side of
>> things).
>> 
>> There's a lot of continual cleanup to do here; but given that this is a
>> project that has previously been released (pre-apache), and many of these
>> items are an issue in the old version (ie: existing users have already
>> dealt with things like no direct link from download to how to get
>> started/build etc), I don't see anything blocking.
>> 
>> Hen
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all
>>> 
>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
>>> candidate 3.
>>> 
>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>>> 
>>> Vote thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Result thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The release tag can be found here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be
>>> found here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>>> 
>>> 
>>> KEY files are available here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Dominic Divakaruni
> 206.475.9200 Cell

Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Dominic Divakaruni <do...@gmail.com>.
+ dev@
This is great feedback. Thanks to the PMC for reviewing. Megna is on point
to track all this feedback, capture action items on the wiki and Jira..

Overall it looks like we have 3 binding +1's.

Are we good to proceed with making the release official?

Best,
Dom

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding) to the release.
>
> Minor items (fix next release):
>
> * R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README
> could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside
> of Apache).
> * Agreed with Justin that there needs to be a Getting Started text file of
> some kind. This could be a link from the README.md to the docs/get_started
> directory perhaps; though .md format isn't the easiest to read (ie: link to
> website and over time we should consider whether a local version is
> needed).
> * CONTRIBUTORS.md calls the project DMLC/MXNet.
> * The NEWS.md refers to 0.11.0-rc3 as the latest version. This should refer
> to the version being released rather than the rc3.
> * The README.md also refers to rc3. It shouldn't refer to rc3 as a release,
> and ideally it would refer to 0.11.0 as a release (though tricky to be
> forward looking given that GitHub treats that as a homepage). Randomly
> noting that the What's New should be dated.
> * The README.md refers to the copyright being owned by Contributors. Needs
> updating to a license statement (with NOTICE handling the copyright side of
> things).
>
> There's a lot of continual cleanup to do here; but given that this is a
> project that has previously been released (pre-apache), and many of these
> items are an issue in the old version (ie: existing users have already
> dealt with things like no direct link from download to how to get
> started/build etc), I don't see anything blocking.
>
> Hen
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
> > candidate 3.
> >
> > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >
> >
> > Result thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> >
> >
> > The release tag can be found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> >
> >
> > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be
> > found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> >
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> >
> >
> > KEY files are available here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> >
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>



-- 


Dominic Divakaruni
206.475.9200 Cell

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Dominic Divakaruni <do...@gmail.com>.
+ dev@
This is great feedback. Thanks to the PMC for reviewing. Megna is on point
to track all this feedback, capture action items on the wiki and Jira..

Overall it looks like we have 3 binding +1's.

Are we good to proceed with making the release official?

Best,
Dom

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding) to the release.
>
> Minor items (fix next release):
>
> * R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README
> could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside
> of Apache).
> * Agreed with Justin that there needs to be a Getting Started text file of
> some kind. This could be a link from the README.md to the docs/get_started
> directory perhaps; though .md format isn't the easiest to read (ie: link to
> website and over time we should consider whether a local version is
> needed).
> * CONTRIBUTORS.md calls the project DMLC/MXNet.
> * The NEWS.md refers to 0.11.0-rc3 as the latest version. This should refer
> to the version being released rather than the rc3.
> * The README.md also refers to rc3. It shouldn't refer to rc3 as a release,
> and ideally it would refer to 0.11.0 as a release (though tricky to be
> forward looking given that GitHub treats that as a homepage). Randomly
> noting that the What's New should be dated.
> * The README.md refers to the copyright being owned by Contributors. Needs
> updating to a license statement (with NOTICE handling the copyright side of
> things).
>
> There's a lot of continual cleanup to do here; but given that this is a
> project that has previously been released (pre-apache), and many of these
> items are an issue in the old version (ie: existing users have already
> dealt with things like no direct link from download to how to get
> started/build etc), I don't see anything blocking.
>
> Hen
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
> > candidate 3.
> >
> > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >
> >
> > Result thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> >
> >
> > The release tag can be found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> >
> >
> > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be
> > found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> >
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> >
> >
> > KEY files are available here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> >
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>



-- 


Dominic Divakaruni
206.475.9200 Cell

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding) to the release.

Minor items (fix next release):

* R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README
could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside
of Apache).
* Agreed with Justin that there needs to be a Getting Started text file of
some kind. This could be a link from the README.md to the docs/get_started
directory perhaps; though .md format isn't the easiest to read (ie: link to
website and over time we should consider whether a local version is needed).
* CONTRIBUTORS.md calls the project DMLC/MXNet.
* The NEWS.md refers to 0.11.0-rc3 as the latest version. This should refer
to the version being released rather than the rc3.
* The README.md also refers to rc3. It shouldn't refer to rc3 as a release,
and ideally it would refer to 0.11.0 as a release (though tricky to be
forward looking given that GitHub treats that as a homepage). Randomly
noting that the What's New should be dated.
* The README.md refers to the copyright being owned by Contributors. Needs
updating to a license statement (with NOTICE handling the copyright side of
things).

There's a lot of continual cleanup to do here; but given that this is a
project that has previously been released (pre-apache), and many of these
items are an issue in the old version (ie: existing users have already
dealt with things like no direct link from download to how to get
started/build etc), I don't see anything blocking.

Hen


On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
> candidate 3.
>
> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>
>
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
>
>
> The release tag can be found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>
>
> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be
> found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>
>
> KEY files are available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
>
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks.
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
HI,

I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE may have wrong year range (should


While a number of file (around 50 odd) do have "Copyright (c) 2016 by Contributors” they don’t have a full Apache licensed header please fix this in the next release.

Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com>.
Thanks John. I will create the JIRA tickets to track your inputs as requested. 

Meghna
 
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 6:14 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
> 
> - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
> NOTICE file.
> - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
> contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of
> agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
> been handled in the past).
> 
> Please create JIRAs to track these.
> 
> John
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
>> I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
>> contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.
>> 
>> We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
>> largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording
>> there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most are
>> covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 of
>> Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
>> 
>> To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
>> "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
>> 
>> Hen
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Henri,
>>> 
>>> If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed
>> to
>>> the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part
>> of
>>> IP Clearance.
>>> 
>>> It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>>> 
>>> Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
>>> who are not now committers?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Craig
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
>>> Will
>>>> review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
>>>> 
>>>> There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code
>> has
>>>> been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dominic,
>>>>> 
>>>>> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
>>> Licensed
>>>>> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>>>>> 
>>>>> John
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
>>>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
>>>>>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
>> vote?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
>> project?
>>>>>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dom
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
>> johndament@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
>>> releases.
>>>>>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
>> being
>>>>> no
>>>>>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
>> ICLAs
>>>>> and
>>>>>>> files that have changed license.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
>>>>>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
>>>>>>> committers
>>>>>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
>>>>> 0.11.0
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> still open.
>>>>>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Meghna
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> candidate 3.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>> at:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> found here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>>>>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/
>>>>>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>>>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>>> clr@apache.org <ma...@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo <http://db.apache.org/jdo>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com>.
Thanks John. I will create the JIRA tickets to track your inputs as requested. 

Meghna
 
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 6:14 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
> 
> - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
> NOTICE file.
> - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
> contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of
> agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
> been handled in the past).
> 
> Please create JIRAs to track these.
> 
> John
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
>> I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
>> contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.
>> 
>> We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
>> largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording
>> there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most are
>> covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 of
>> Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
>> 
>> To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
>> "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
>> 
>> Hen
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Henri,
>>> 
>>> If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed
>> to
>>> the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part
>> of
>>> IP Clearance.
>>> 
>>> It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>>> 
>>> Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
>>> who are not now committers?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Craig
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
>>> Will
>>>> review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
>>>> 
>>>> There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code
>> has
>>>> been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dominic,
>>>>> 
>>>>> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
>>> Licensed
>>>>> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>>>>> 
>>>>> John
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
>>>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
>>>>>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
>> vote?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
>> project?
>>>>>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dom
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
>> johndament@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
>>> releases.
>>>>>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
>> being
>>>>> no
>>>>>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
>> ICLAs
>>>>> and
>>>>>>> files that have changed license.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
>>>>>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
>>>>>>> committers
>>>>>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
>>>>> 0.11.0
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> still open.
>>>>>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Meghna
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> candidate 3.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>> at:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> found here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>>>>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/
>>>>>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>>>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>>> clr@apache.org <ma...@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo <http://db.apache.org/jdo>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
>>
>>
> Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we
> can't remove the copyright claim that already exists.  Us receiving an ICLA
> is what allows us to say "Licensed to the ASF" (it's in the ICLA).
>
> It's not a big deal, since its Apache licensed, we just have to be careful
> we're removing someone's pre-existing claim.
>

I'll give a more concrete example.

Let's say I imported this file into an ASF repo
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/v5.0.0.RC3/spring-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/util/StringUtils.java

I wouldn't change the header to say licensed to the ASF.  None of the
contributors have signed ICLAs.  The file header would remain in tact.  I
would also have to carry their notice file around
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/v5.0.0.RC3/src/docs/dist/notice.txt
(at
least I'm assuming this is their NOTICE file, I can't find any others
around)

John



>
>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
>> >
>> > - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have
>> explicit
>> > notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to
>> the
>> > NOTICE file.
>> > - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
>> > contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some
>> kind of
>> > agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
>> > been handled in the past).
>> >
>> > Please create JIRAs to track these.
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that
>> all
>> > > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing
>> project.
>> > >
>> > > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for
>> the
>> > > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible
>> > wording
>> > > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most
>> > are
>> > > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause
>> 5
>> > of
>> > > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
>> > >
>> > > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
>> > > "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
>> > >
>> > > Hen
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Henri,
>> > > >
>> > > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who
>> contributed
>> > > to
>> > > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as
>> > part
>> > > of
>> > > > IP Clearance.
>> > > >
>> > > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>> > > >
>> > > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the
>> > incubator
>> > > > who are not now committers?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Craig
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling
>> > release.
>> > > > Will
>> > > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?).
>> Code
>> > > has
>> > > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <
>> johndament@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Dominic,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always
>> Apache
>> > > > Licensed
>> > > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> John
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
>> > > > >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so
>> far.
>> > > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review
>> and
>> > > vote?
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
>> > > project?
>> > > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Dom
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
>> > > johndament@apache.org>
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
>> > > > releases.
>> > > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to
>> there
>> > > being
>> > > > >> no
>> > > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
>> > > ICLAs
>> > > > >> and
>> > > > >>>> files that have changed license.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
>> > > > >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
>> > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can
>> the
>> > > > >>>> committers
>> > > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh
>> in
>> > on
>> > > > >> this
>> > > > >>>>> release?
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Hi All,
>> > > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet
>> (incubating)
>> > > > >> 0.11.0
>> > > > >>>> is
>> > > > >>>>>> still open.
>> > > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > >>>>>> Meghna
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi all
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating)
>> > 0.11.0,
>> > > > >>>>> release
>> > > > >>>>>>> candidate 3.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Vote thread:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Result thread:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can
>> be
>> > > > >>> found
>> > > > >>>>> at:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>> > > > >>> <
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
>> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd
>> > and
>> > > > >>> can
>> > > > >>>>> be
>> > > > >>>>>> found here:
>> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>> > > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
>> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> > > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>> > > > >>> <
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>> > > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>> > > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>> > > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
>> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> --
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni
>> > > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
>> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > Craig L Russell
>> > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>> > > > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
>>
>>
> Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we
> can't remove the copyright claim that already exists.  Us receiving an ICLA
> is what allows us to say "Licensed to the ASF" (it's in the ICLA).
>
> It's not a big deal, since its Apache licensed, we just have to be careful
> we're removing someone's pre-existing claim.
>

I'll give a more concrete example.

Let's say I imported this file into an ASF repo
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/v5.0.0.RC3/spring-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/util/StringUtils.java

I wouldn't change the header to say licensed to the ASF.  None of the
contributors have signed ICLAs.  The file header would remain in tact.  I
would also have to carry their notice file around
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/v5.0.0.RC3/src/docs/dist/notice.txt
(at
least I'm assuming this is their NOTICE file, I can't find any others
around)

John



>
>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
>> >
>> > - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have
>> explicit
>> > notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to
>> the
>> > NOTICE file.
>> > - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
>> > contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some
>> kind of
>> > agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
>> > been handled in the past).
>> >
>> > Please create JIRAs to track these.
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that
>> all
>> > > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing
>> project.
>> > >
>> > > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for
>> the
>> > > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible
>> > wording
>> > > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most
>> > are
>> > > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause
>> 5
>> > of
>> > > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
>> > >
>> > > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
>> > > "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
>> > >
>> > > Hen
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Henri,
>> > > >
>> > > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who
>> contributed
>> > > to
>> > > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as
>> > part
>> > > of
>> > > > IP Clearance.
>> > > >
>> > > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>> > > >
>> > > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the
>> > incubator
>> > > > who are not now committers?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Craig
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling
>> > release.
>> > > > Will
>> > > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?).
>> Code
>> > > has
>> > > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <
>> johndament@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Dominic,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always
>> Apache
>> > > > Licensed
>> > > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> John
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
>> > > > >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so
>> far.
>> > > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review
>> and
>> > > vote?
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
>> > > project?
>> > > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Dom
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
>> > > johndament@apache.org>
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
>> > > > releases.
>> > > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to
>> there
>> > > being
>> > > > >> no
>> > > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
>> > > ICLAs
>> > > > >> and
>> > > > >>>> files that have changed license.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
>> > > > >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
>> > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can
>> the
>> > > > >>>> committers
>> > > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh
>> in
>> > on
>> > > > >> this
>> > > > >>>>> release?
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Hi All,
>> > > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet
>> (incubating)
>> > > > >> 0.11.0
>> > > > >>>> is
>> > > > >>>>>> still open.
>> > > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > >>>>>> Meghna
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi all
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating)
>> > 0.11.0,
>> > > > >>>>> release
>> > > > >>>>>>> candidate 3.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Vote thread:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Result thread:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can
>> be
>> > > > >>> found
>> > > > >>>>> at:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>> > > > >>> <
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
>> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd
>> > and
>> > > > >>> can
>> > > > >>>>> be
>> > > > >>>>>> found here:
>> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>> > > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
>> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> > > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>> > > > >>> <
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>> > > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>> > > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>> > > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
>> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> --
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni
>> > > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
>> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > Craig L Russell
>> > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>> > > > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:

> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
>
>
Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we can't
remove the copyright claim that already exists.  Us receiving an ICLA is
what allows us to say "Licensed to the ASF" (it's in the ICLA).

It's not a big deal, since its Apache licensed, we just have to be careful
we're removing someone's pre-existing claim.


> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
> >
> > - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> > notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
> > NOTICE file.
> > - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
> > contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind
> of
> > agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
> > been handled in the past).
> >
> > Please create JIRAs to track these.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that
> all
> > > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing
> project.
> > >
> > > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for
> the
> > > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible
> > wording
> > > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most
> > are
> > > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5
> > of
> > > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
> > >
> > > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
> > > "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Henri,
> > > >
> > > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who
> contributed
> > > to
> > > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as
> > part
> > > of
> > > > IP Clearance.
> > > >
> > > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
> > > >
> > > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the
> > incubator
> > > > who are not now committers?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Craig
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling
> > release.
> > > > Will
> > > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> > > > >
> > > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?).
> Code
> > > has
> > > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Dominic,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> > > > Licensed
> > > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> John
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> > > > >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so
> far.
> > > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
> > > vote?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
> > > project?
> > > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Dom
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> > > > releases.
> > > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
> > > being
> > > > >> no
> > > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
> > > ICLAs
> > > > >> and
> > > > >>>> files that have changed license.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > > > >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > > > >>>> committers
> > > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in
> > on
> > > > >> this
> > > > >>>>> release?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Hi All,
> > > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> > > > >> 0.11.0
> > > > >>>> is
> > > > >>>>>> still open.
> > > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>> Meghna
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Hi all
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating)
> > 0.11.0,
> > > > >>>>> release
> > > > >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Result thread:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can
> be
> > > > >>> found
> > > > >>>>> at:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > > >>> <
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd
> > and
> > > > >>> can
> > > > >>>>> be
> > > > >>>>>> found here:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/
> > > > >>>>>>
> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > > >>> <
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Craig L Russell
> > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> > > > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:

> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
>
>
Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we can't
remove the copyright claim that already exists.  Us receiving an ICLA is
what allows us to say "Licensed to the ASF" (it's in the ICLA).

It's not a big deal, since its Apache licensed, we just have to be careful
we're removing someone's pre-existing claim.


> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
> >
> > - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> > notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
> > NOTICE file.
> > - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
> > contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind
> of
> > agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
> > been handled in the past).
> >
> > Please create JIRAs to track these.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that
> all
> > > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing
> project.
> > >
> > > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for
> the
> > > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible
> > wording
> > > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most
> > are
> > > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5
> > of
> > > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
> > >
> > > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
> > > "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Henri,
> > > >
> > > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who
> contributed
> > > to
> > > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as
> > part
> > > of
> > > > IP Clearance.
> > > >
> > > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
> > > >
> > > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the
> > incubator
> > > > who are not now committers?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Craig
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling
> > release.
> > > > Will
> > > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> > > > >
> > > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?).
> Code
> > > has
> > > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Dominic,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> > > > Licensed
> > > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> John
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> > > > >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so
> far.
> > > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
> > > vote?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
> > > project?
> > > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Dom
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> > > > releases.
> > > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
> > > being
> > > > >> no
> > > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
> > > ICLAs
> > > > >> and
> > > > >>>> files that have changed license.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > > > >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > > > >>>> committers
> > > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in
> > on
> > > > >> this
> > > > >>>>> release?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Hi All,
> > > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> > > > >> 0.11.0
> > > > >>>> is
> > > > >>>>>> still open.
> > > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>> Meghna
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Hi all
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating)
> > 0.11.0,
> > > > >>>>> release
> > > > >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Result thread:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can
> be
> > > > >>> found
> > > > >>>>> at:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > > >>> <
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd
> > and
> > > > >>> can
> > > > >>>>> be
> > > > >>>>>> found here:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/
> > > > >>>>>>
> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > > >>> <
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Craig L Russell
> > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> > > > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
>
> - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
> NOTICE file.
> - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
> contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of
> agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
> been handled in the past).
>
> Please create JIRAs to track these.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
> > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.
> >
> > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
> > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible
> wording
> > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most
> are
> > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5
> of
> > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
> >
> > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
> > "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Henri,
> > >
> > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed
> > to
> > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as
> part
> > of
> > > IP Clearance.
> > >
> > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
> > >
> > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the
> incubator
> > > who are not now committers?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling
> release.
> > > Will
> > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> > > >
> > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code
> > has
> > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Dominic,
> > > >>
> > > >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> > > Licensed
> > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> > > >>
> > > >> John
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> > > >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
> > vote?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
> > project?
> > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Dom
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
> > johndament@apache.org>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> > > releases.
> > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
> > being
> > > >> no
> > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
> > ICLAs
> > > >> and
> > > >>>> files that have changed license.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > > >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > > >>>> committers
> > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in
> on
> > > >> this
> > > >>>>> release?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hi All,
> > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> > > >> 0.11.0
> > > >>>> is
> > > >>>>>> still open.
> > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>> Meghna
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Hi all
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating)
> 0.11.0,
> > > >>>>> release
> > > >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Result thread:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > > >>> found
> > > >>>>> at:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > >>> <
> > > >>>>>>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd
> and
> > > >>> can
> > > >>>>> be
> > > >>>>>> found here:
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/
> > > >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > >>> <
> > > >>>>>>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > Craig L Russell
> > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> > > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
>
> - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
> NOTICE file.
> - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
> contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of
> agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
> been handled in the past).
>
> Please create JIRAs to track these.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
> > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.
> >
> > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
> > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible
> wording
> > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most
> are
> > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5
> of
> > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
> >
> > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
> > "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Henri,
> > >
> > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed
> > to
> > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as
> part
> > of
> > > IP Clearance.
> > >
> > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
> > >
> > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the
> incubator
> > > who are not now committers?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling
> release.
> > > Will
> > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> > > >
> > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code
> > has
> > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Dominic,
> > > >>
> > > >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> > > Licensed
> > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> > > >>
> > > >> John
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> > > >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
> > vote?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
> > project?
> > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Dom
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
> > johndament@apache.org>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> > > releases.
> > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
> > being
> > > >> no
> > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
> > ICLAs
> > > >> and
> > > >>>> files that have changed license.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > > >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > > >>>> committers
> > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in
> on
> > > >> this
> > > >>>>> release?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hi All,
> > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> > > >> 0.11.0
> > > >>>> is
> > > >>>>>> still open.
> > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>> Meghna
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Hi all
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating)
> 0.11.0,
> > > >>>>> release
> > > >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Result thread:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > > >>> found
> > > >>>>> at:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > >>> <
> > > >>>>>>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd
> and
> > > >>> can
> > > >>>>> be
> > > >>>>>> found here:
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/
> > > >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > >>> <
> > > >>>>>>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > Craig L Russell
> > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> > > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:

- The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
NOTICE file.
- The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of
agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
been handled in the past).

Please create JIRAs to track these.

John

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:

> I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
> contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.
>
> We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
> largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording
> there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most are
> covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 of
> Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
>
> To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
> "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Henri,
> >
> > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed
> to
> > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part
> of
> > IP Clearance.
> >
> > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
> >
> > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
> > who are not now committers?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
> > Will
> > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> > >
> > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code
> has
> > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dominic,
> > >>
> > >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> > Licensed
> > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> > >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
> vote?
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
> project?
> > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> > >>>
> > >>> Dom
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> > releases.
> > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
> being
> > >> no
> > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
> ICLAs
> > >> and
> > >>>> files that have changed license.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > >>>> committers
> > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
> > >> this
> > >>>>> release?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> > >> 0.11.0
> > >>>> is
> > >>>>>> still open.
> > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Meghna
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi all
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> > >>>>> release
> > >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > >>>>>>
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Result thread:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > >>>>>>
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > >>> found
> > >>>>> at:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > >>> <
> > >>>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> > >>> can
> > >>>>> be
> > >>>>>> found here:
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> > >> https://github.com/apache/
> > >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > >>> <
> > >>>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > Craig L Russell
> > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:

- The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
NOTICE file.
- The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of
agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
been handled in the past).

Please create JIRAs to track these.

John

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:

> I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
> contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.
>
> We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
> largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording
> there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most are
> covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 of
> Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
>
> To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
> "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Henri,
> >
> > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed
> to
> > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part
> of
> > IP Clearance.
> >
> > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
> >
> > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
> > who are not now committers?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
> > Will
> > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> > >
> > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code
> has
> > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dominic,
> > >>
> > >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> > Licensed
> > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> > >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
> vote?
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
> project?
> > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> > >>>
> > >>> Dom
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> > releases.
> > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
> being
> > >> no
> > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
> ICLAs
> > >> and
> > >>>> files that have changed license.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > >>>> committers
> > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
> > >> this
> > >>>>> release?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> > >> 0.11.0
> > >>>> is
> > >>>>>> still open.
> > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Meghna
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi all
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> > >>>>> release
> > >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > >>>>>>
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Result thread:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > >>>>>>
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > >>> found
> > >>>>> at:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > >>> <
> > >>>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> > >>> can
> > >>>>> be
> > >>>>>> found here:
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> > >> https://github.com/apache/
> > >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > >>> <
> > >>>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > Craig L Russell
> > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.

We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording
there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most are
covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 of
Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.

To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
"Copyright <year> by Contributors".

Hen

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Henri,
>
> If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to
> the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of
> IP Clearance.
>
> It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>
> Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
> who are not now committers?
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
> Will
> > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> >
> > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
> > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dominic,
> >>
> >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> Licensed
> >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
> >>>
> >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> >>>
> >>> Dom
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> releases.
> >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being
> >> no
> >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs
> >> and
> >>>> files that have changed license.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> >>>> committers
> >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
> >> this
> >>>>> release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> >> 0.11.0
> >>>> is
> >>>>>> still open.
> >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Meghna
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Result thread:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> >>> found
> >>>>> at:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>> <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> >>> can
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>> found here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> >> https://github.com/apache/
> >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>> <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >>>
> >>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.

We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording
there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most are
covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 of
Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.

To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
"Copyright <year> by Contributors".

Hen

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Henri,
>
> If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to
> the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of
> IP Clearance.
>
> It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>
> Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
> who are not now committers?
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
> Will
> > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> >
> > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
> > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dominic,
> >>
> >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> Licensed
> >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
> >>>
> >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> >>>
> >>> Dom
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> releases.
> >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being
> >> no
> >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs
> >> and
> >>>> files that have changed license.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> >>>> committers
> >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
> >> this
> >>>>> release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> >> 0.11.0
> >>>> is
> >>>>>> still open.
> >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Meghna
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Result thread:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> >>> found
> >>>>> at:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>> <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> >>> can
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>> found here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> >> https://github.com/apache/
> >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>> <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >>>
> >>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Well, specific to what I'm seeing in MXNet's release, where I'm concerned
is that almost all of the files have the "Licensed to the ASF" header.  If
there was an existing copyright on there before, that should remain,
regardless of whether the license is apache v2 or not, unless every single
contributor to that file has signed an ICLA.  I haven't found any yet, but
I'm inclined to give this a +1 (but that's not my vote yet) with notes that
they need to be very thorough on which files are actually licensed to us vs
from authors not on ICLAs.

John

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:01 PM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Henri,
>
> If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to
> the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of
> IP Clearance.
>
> It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>
> Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
> who are not now committers?
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
> Will
> > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> >
> > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
> > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dominic,
> >>
> >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> Licensed
> >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
> >>>
> >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> >>>
> >>> Dom
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> releases.
> >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being
> >> no
> >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs
> >> and
> >>>> files that have changed license.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> >>>> committers
> >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
> >> this
> >>>>> release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> >> 0.11.0
> >>>> is
> >>>>>> still open.
> >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Meghna
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Result thread:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> >>> found
> >>>>> at:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>> <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> >>> can
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>> found here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> >> https://github.com/apache/
> >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>> <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >>>
> >>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Well, specific to what I'm seeing in MXNet's release, where I'm concerned
is that almost all of the files have the "Licensed to the ASF" header.  If
there was an existing copyright on there before, that should remain,
regardless of whether the license is apache v2 or not, unless every single
contributor to that file has signed an ICLA.  I haven't found any yet, but
I'm inclined to give this a +1 (but that's not my vote yet) with notes that
they need to be very thorough on which files are actually licensed to us vs
from authors not on ICLAs.

John

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:01 PM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Henri,
>
> If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to
> the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of
> IP Clearance.
>
> It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>
> Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
> who are not now committers?
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
> Will
> > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> >
> > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
> > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dominic,
> >>
> >> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
> Licensed
> >> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> >> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
> >>>
> >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> >>>
> >>> Dom
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
> releases.
> >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being
> >> no
> >>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs
> >> and
> >>>> files that have changed license.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> >>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> >>>> committers
> >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
> >> this
> >>>>> release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> >> 0.11.0
> >>>> is
> >>>>>> still open.
> >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Meghna
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> >>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi all
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>> candidate 3.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vote thread:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Result thread:
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> >>>>>>
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> >>> found
> >>>>> at:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>> <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> >>> can
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>> found here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> >> https://github.com/apache/
> >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>> <
> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
> >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dominic Divakaruni
> >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >>>
> >>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
Hi Henri,

If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of IP Clearance.

It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0. 

Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator who are not now committers?

Regards,

Craig

> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release. Will
> review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> 
> There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
> been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Dominic,
>> 
>> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache Licensed
>> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
>>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
>>> 
>>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
>>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>>> 
>>> Dom
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
>>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being
>> no
>>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs
>> and
>>>> files that have changed license.
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
>>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
>>>> committers
>>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
>> this
>>>>> release?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
>> 0.11.0
>>>> is
>>>>>> still open.
>>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Meghna
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
>>>>> release
>>>>>>> candidate 3.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>>>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>>>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>>> found
>>>>> at:
>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>> <
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
>>> can
>>>>> be
>>>>>> found here:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
>> https://github.com/apache/
>>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>> <
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>> 
>> 

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
Hi Henri,

If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of IP Clearance.

It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0. 

Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator who are not now committers?

Regards,

Craig

> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release. Will
> review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
> 
> There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
> been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Dominic,
>> 
>> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache Licensed
>> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
>>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
>>> 
>>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
>>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>>> 
>>> Dom
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
>>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being
>> no
>>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs
>> and
>>>> files that have changed license.
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
>>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
>>>> committers
>>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
>> this
>>>>> release?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
>> 0.11.0
>>>> is
>>>>>> still open.
>>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Meghna
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
>>>>> release
>>>>>>> candidate 3.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>>>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
>>>>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>>> found
>>>>> at:
>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>> <
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
>>> can
>>>>> be
>>>>>> found here:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
>> https://github.com/apache/
>>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>> <
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>> 
>> 

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release. Will
review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.

There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Dominic,
>
> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache Licensed
> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> > Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
> >
> > Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> > Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> >
> > Dom
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
> > > Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being
> no
> > > SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs
> and
> > > files that have changed license.
> > >
> > > On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > > dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > > committers
> > > > for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
> this
> > > > release?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> 0.11.0
> > > is
> > > > > still open.
> > > > > The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Meghna
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> > > > release
> > > > > > candidate 3.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > found
> > > > at:
> > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > <
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release tag can be found here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> > can
> > > > be
> > > > > found here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > > > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> https://github.com/apache/
> > > > > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > KEY files are available here:
> > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > <
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dominic Divakaruni
> > > > 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Dominic Divakaruni
> > 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release. Will
review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.

There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Dominic,
>
> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache Licensed
> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> > Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
> >
> > Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> > Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
> >
> > Dom
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
> > > Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being
> no
> > > SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs
> and
> > > files that have changed license.
> > >
> > > On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > > dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > > committers
> > > > for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on
> this
> > > > release?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
> 0.11.0
> > > is
> > > > > still open.
> > > > > The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Meghna
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > > meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> > > > release
> > > > > > candidate 3.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > found
> > > > at:
> > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > <
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release tag can be found here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> > can
> > > > be
> > > > > found here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > > > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
> https://github.com/apache/
> > > > > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > KEY files are available here:
> > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> > <
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dominic Divakaruni
> > > > 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Dominic Divakaruni
> > 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Dominic,

One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache Licensed
(prior to coming to the ASF)?

John

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
>
> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>
> Dom
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
> > Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being no
> > SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs and
> > files that have changed license.
> >
> > On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > committers
> > > for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on this
> > > release?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0
> > is
> > > > still open.
> > > > The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Meghna
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> > > release
> > > > > candidate 3.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Result thread:
> > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found
> > > at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> <
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The release tag can be found here:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> can
> > > be
> > > > found here:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> > > > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > KEY files are available here:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> <
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > Dominic Divakaruni
> > > 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Dominic Divakaruni
> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Dominic,

One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache Licensed
(prior to coming to the ASF)?

John

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
>
> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>
> Dom
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
> > Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being no
> > SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs and
> > files that have changed license.
> >
> > On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> > dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> > committers
> > > for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on this
> > > release?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0
> > is
> > > > still open.
> > > > The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Meghna
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> > meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> > > release
> > > > > candidate 3.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Result thread:
> > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found
> > > at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> <
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The release tag can be found here:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and
> can
> > > be
> > > > found here:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> > > > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > KEY files are available here:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
> <
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > Dominic Divakaruni
> > > 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Dominic Divakaruni
> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Dominic Divakaruni <do...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?

Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.

Dom


On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being no
> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs and
> files that have changed license.
>
> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> committers
> > for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on this
> > release?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > > This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0
> is
> > > still open.
> > > The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Meghna
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> > release
> > > > candidate 3.
> > > >
> > > > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > >
> > > > Vote thread:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Result thread:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The release tag can be found here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can
> > be
> > > found here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> > > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > KEY files are available here:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Dominic Divakaruni
> > 206.475.9200 Cell
> >
>



-- 


Dominic Divakaruni
206.475.9200 Cell

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Dominic Divakaruni <do...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?

Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.

Dom


On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being no
> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs and
> files that have changed license.
>
> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the
> committers
> > for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on this
> > release?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > > This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0
> is
> > > still open.
> > > The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Meghna
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> > release
> > > > candidate 3.
> > > >
> > > > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > > >
> > > > Vote thread:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Result thread:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The release tag can be found here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can
> > be
> > > found here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> > > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > KEY files are available here:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Dominic Divakaruni
> > 206.475.9200 Cell
> >
>



-- 


Dominic Divakaruni
206.475.9200 Cell

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review releases.
Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there being no
SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check ICLAs and
files that have changed license.

On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <do...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the committers
> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on this
> release?
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 is
> > still open.
> > The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Meghna
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0,
> release
> > > candidate 3.
> > >
> > > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> > >
> > > Vote thread:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> > 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > >
> > >
> > > Result thread:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> > 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> > >
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > >
> > >
> > > The release tag can be found here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> > >
> > >
> > > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can
> be
> > found here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> > incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> > >
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> > >
> > >
> > > KEY files are available here:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> > >
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
> Dominic Divakaruni
> 206.475.9200 Cell
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Dominic Divakaruni <do...@gmail.com>.
Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the committers
for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on this
release?

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 is
> still open.
> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because…
>
> Thanks,
> Meghna
>
>
>
> > On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
> > candidate 3.
> >
> > Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >
> >
> > Result thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> >
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> >
> >
> > The release tag can be found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> >
> >
> > The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be
> found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/
> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> >
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> >
> >
> > KEY files are available here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> >
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> >
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks.
>
>


-- 


Dominic Divakaruni
206.475.9200 Cell

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

Posted by Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com>.
Hi All, 
This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 is still open.
The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC.

[ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because…

Thanks,
Meghna



> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, release
> candidate 3.
> 
> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
> 
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> 
> 
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> 
> 
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> 
> 
> The release tag can be found here: 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
> 
> 
> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and can be found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
> 
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
> 
> 
> KEY files are available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/>
> 
> 
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks.