You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by la...@apache.org on 2016/07/01 04:48:15 UTC
Re: where are we at with the RC?
PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
-- Lars
From: Samarth Jain <sa...@apache.org>
To: dev <de...@phoenix.apache.org>
Cc: Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on this
today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or something
more.
If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this daily
> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be much
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
Big +1 from me, Lars, but I started a discuss thread so we don't hijack
this one (b/c I'm still wondering where we're at with the 4.8 RC).
Thanks,
James
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:54 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> OK... If you guys agree, I'll volunteer, and shoot for a 4.9 (or 4.8.1, or
> 5.0, whatever we decide to name it) release one month after 4.8.(The one
> complicating factor... I will be traveling a bit this coming month).
> -- Lars
> From: James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; "larsh@apache.org"
> <la...@apache.org>
> Cc: Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org>; Samarth Jain <
> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla <
> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com>;
> Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 10:56 PM
> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>
> If we could manage it this way, that'd be great, Lars. If you're up for
> being the RM for 4.9, that'd be much appreciated.
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Saturday, July 2, 2016, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This reminds me a bit of the HBase times before we went to a more or less
> > strict monthly release train.
> > It was harder to stabilize a release and there were lots of last minutes
> > changes and fixes, just because each release was big (in terms of the
> > number of changes).In addition folks were worried when the next release
> > would come about and would push many changes towards the end of the
> release
> > cycle.
> >
> > Most of that stopped with the monthly releases. Commit rates are more
> > even, there's no last minute flurry of changes (after all, the next
> release
> > is just a month away).Users get more frequent release, each with less
> > change and less risk, and they get bug fixes earlier.
> >
> > 4.7 was about 4 months ago, 4.6 was about 4 months before that.For my
> > (personal) taste that is fairly infrequent and the release are too big
> and
> > too hard to stabilize - again just my personal opinion, please do not
> take
> > this in a negative way.
> >
> > Any interest in going to smaller and more frequent releases in Phoenix?
> > Thoughts? Comments?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > -- Lars
> >
> > (If it helps I'll offer to RM a few releases. In that case I'd adhere to
> a
> > monthly release train; whatever change or feature is ready gets on the
> > train, what's not ready waits for the next train to arrive a month
> later.)
> > From: James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <dev@phoenix.apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>; Ankit Singhal <ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>;
> Samarth
> > Jain <samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Rajeshbabu
> > Chintaguntla <rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> > D'Silva <tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba Chohan <
> > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 2:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >
> > How we looking for the RC?
> >
> > On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <samarth.jain@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
> > > think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> > >
> > > The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > > -- Lars
> > > > From: Samarth Jain <samarth@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > To: dev <dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > > Cc: Ankit Singhal <ankit@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > >
> > > > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
> > > this
> > > > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> > something
> > > > more.
> > > > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035
> in.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <
> jamestaylor@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> > > daily
> > > > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> > > > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
> > > much
> > > > > appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > James
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by la...@apache.org.
OK... If you guys agree, I'll volunteer, and shoot for a 4.9 (or 4.8.1, or 5.0, whatever we decide to name it) release one month after 4.8.(The one complicating factor... I will be traveling a bit this coming month).
-- Lars
From: James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; "larsh@apache.org" <la...@apache.org>
Cc: Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org>; Samarth Jain <sa...@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla <rc...@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com>; Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
If we could manage it this way, that'd be great, Lars. If you're up for
being the RM for 4.9, that'd be much appreciated.
Thanks,
James
On Saturday, July 2, 2016, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This reminds me a bit of the HBase times before we went to a more or less
> strict monthly release train.
> It was harder to stabilize a release and there were lots of last minutes
> changes and fixes, just because each release was big (in terms of the
> number of changes).In addition folks were worried when the next release
> would come about and would push many changes towards the end of the release
> cycle.
>
> Most of that stopped with the monthly releases. Commit rates are more
> even, there's no last minute flurry of changes (after all, the next release
> is just a month away).Users get more frequent release, each with less
> change and less risk, and they get bug fixes earlier.
>
> 4.7 was about 4 months ago, 4.6 was about 4 months before that.For my
> (personal) taste that is fairly infrequent and the release are too big and
> too hard to stabilize - again just my personal opinion, please do not take
> this in a negative way.
>
> Any interest in going to smaller and more frequent releases in Phoenix?
> Thoughts? Comments?
>
> Thanks.
> -- Lars
>
> (If it helps I'll offer to RM a few releases. In that case I'd adhere to a
> monthly release train; whatever change or feature is ready gets on the
> train, what's not ready waits for the next train to arrive a month later.)
> From: James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <dev@phoenix.apache.org
> <javascript:;>>; Ankit Singhal <ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>; Samarth
> Jain <samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Rajeshbabu
> Chintaguntla <rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> D'Silva <tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba Chohan <
> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 2:02 PM
> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>
> How we looking for the RC?
>
> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <samarth.jain@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
> > think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> >
> > The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > -- Lars
> > > From: Samarth Jain <samarth@apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > To: dev <dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > Cc: Ankit Singhal <ankit@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >
> > > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
> > this
> > > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> something
> > > more.
> > > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> > daily
> > > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> > > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
> > much
> > > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
If we could manage it this way, that'd be great, Lars. If you're up for
being the RM for 4.9, that'd be much appreciated.
Thanks,
James
On Saturday, July 2, 2016, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This reminds me a bit of the HBase times before we went to a more or less
> strict monthly release train.
> It was harder to stabilize a release and there were lots of last minutes
> changes and fixes, just because each release was big (in terms of the
> number of changes).In addition folks were worried when the next release
> would come about and would push many changes towards the end of the release
> cycle.
>
> Most of that stopped with the monthly releases. Commit rates are more
> even, there's no last minute flurry of changes (after all, the next release
> is just a month away).Users get more frequent release, each with less
> change and less risk, and they get bug fixes earlier.
>
> 4.7 was about 4 months ago, 4.6 was about 4 months before that.For my
> (personal) taste that is fairly infrequent and the release are too big and
> too hard to stabilize - again just my personal opinion, please do not take
> this in a negative way.
>
> Any interest in going to smaller and more frequent releases in Phoenix?
> Thoughts? Comments?
>
> Thanks.
> -- Lars
>
> (If it helps I'll offer to RM a few releases. In that case I'd adhere to a
> monthly release train; whatever change or feature is ready gets on the
> train, what's not ready waits for the next train to arrive a month later.)
> From: James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <dev@phoenix.apache.org
> <javascript:;>>; Ankit Singhal <ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>; Samarth
> Jain <samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Rajeshbabu
> Chintaguntla <rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> D'Silva <tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba Chohan <
> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 2:02 PM
> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>
> How we looking for the RC?
>
> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <samarth.jain@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
> > think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> >
> > The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > -- Lars
> > > From: Samarth Jain <samarth@apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > To: dev <dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > Cc: Ankit Singhal <ankit@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >
> > > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
> > this
> > > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> something
> > > more.
> > > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> > daily
> > > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> > > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
> > much
> > > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by la...@apache.org.
Hi all,
This reminds me a bit of the HBase times before we went to a more or less strict monthly release train.
It was harder to stabilize a release and there were lots of last minutes changes and fixes, just because each release was big (in terms of the number of changes).In addition folks were worried when the next release would come about and would push many changes towards the end of the release cycle.
Most of that stopped with the monthly releases. Commit rates are more even, there's no last minute flurry of changes (after all, the next release is just a month away).Users get more frequent release, each with less change and less risk, and they get bug fixes earlier.
4.7 was about 4 months ago, 4.6 was about 4 months before that.For my (personal) taste that is fairly infrequent and the release are too big and too hard to stabilize - again just my personal opinion, please do not take this in a negative way.
Any interest in going to smaller and more frequent releases in Phoenix? Thoughts? Comments?
Thanks.
-- Lars
(If it helps I'll offer to RM a few releases. In that case I'd adhere to a monthly release train; whatever change or feature is ready gets on the train, what's not ready waits for the next train to arrive a month later.)
From: James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org>; Samarth Jain <sa...@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla <rc...@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com>; Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
How we looking for the RC?
On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
>
> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > -- Lars
> > From: Samarth Jain <samarth@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > To: dev <dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > Cc: Ankit Singhal <ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >
> > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
> this
> > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or something
> > more.
> > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> daily
> > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
> much
> > > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
Yes, all unresolved JIRAs except blocker for 4.8 are moved to 4.9.
Here, is the filter to track blocker for 4.8 now
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?jql=project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20priority%20in%20(Blocker)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.8.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC
@dev, please add if anything else is blocker for 4.8.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:30 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Ankit - Can we move all non blocking issues marked for 4.8 to 4.9 too?
> Here's a link to the 97 open JIRAs for 4.8:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2508?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%204.8.0%20AND%20project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:24 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be
> possible
> > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for 4.8?
> Is PHOENIX-3056
> > a blocker?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
> >> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded
> >> package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully,
> anyways)
> >> -- I'm looking at it now.
> >>
> >>
> >> rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
> >>>> -- Lars
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
> >>>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> >>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain<
> >>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
> >>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<tdsilva@salesforce.com
> >;
> >>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
> >>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> >>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >>>>
> >>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
> >>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on
> cluster.
> >>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index
> upgrade
> >>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
> >>>> PHOENIX-3002.
> >>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in
> transit
> >>>> for 2 days.
> >>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Ankit Singhal
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> How we looking for the RC?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked
> in. I
> >>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> >>>>>>> -- Lars
> >>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work
> on
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> something
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> more.
> >>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> in.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> >>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> daily
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> >>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that
> be
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> much
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> appreciated.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> James
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
@Ankit - Can we move all non blocking issues marked for 4.8 to 4.9 too?
Here's a link to the 97 open JIRAs for 4.8:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2508?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%204.8.0%20AND%20project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:24 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be possible
> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> a blocker?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded
>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully, anyways)
>> -- I'm looking at it now.
>>
>>
>> rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
>>>> -- Lars
>>>>
>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain<
>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<td...@salesforce.com>;
>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>
>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on cluster.
>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index upgrade
>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in transit
>>>> for 2 days.
>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How we looking for the RC?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>>>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> something
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> in.
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> daily
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
It's ok James , I would be able to cut RC today.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:24 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> If you don't have time today, Ankit (as its getting late in India) perhaps
> Mujtaba may be able to cut the RCs this morning US time?
>
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, it is already committed.. I'll try to get the RC today.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:43 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok - would it be possible to get an RC up today once PHOENIX-3021 is
> > > checked in?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ankit Singhal <
> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > As per description, PHOENIX-3021 seems to be a serious issue with
> local
> > > > index. As the fix is almost there, we can wait for it, if others
> agree
> > > on
> > > > same.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <
> jamestaylor@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Builds look good now. Should Sergey commit PHOENIX-3021? Or should
> we
> > > >> proceed with RC without it?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> James
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, James Taylor <
> > jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing
> > > >> issues,
> > > >> > mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the
> > > IndexTool.
> > > >> > Hopefully we're good to go now.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > James
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang <
> > > >> > simon.wang@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Thanks, James!
> > > >> >> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became
> much
> > > >> more
> > > >> >> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit
> for
> > > >> jumping
> > > >> >> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix
> > > >> codebase,
> > > >> >> and look to make more contributions in future!
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Best,
> > > >> >> Tongzhou (Simon)
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <
> > jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead
> > with
> > > >> the
> > > >> >> RC
> > > >> >> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Thanks,
> > > >> >> > James
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <
> > > >> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> > wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> > > >> >> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
> > > >> >> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <
> > > >> >> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there
> > anything
> > > >> >> missing?
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>> Thanks,
> > > >> >> >>>> James
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <
> > > >> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> > > >> >> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need
> to
> > > >> check
> > > >> >> >>>> whether
> > > >> >> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has
> > > uncovered
> > > >> >> some
> > > >> >> >>>> old
> > > >> >> >>>>> bugs.
> > > >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review
> comments,
> > > will
> > > >> >> >>> upload
> > > >> >> >>>>> patch soon.
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>> Regards,
> > > >> >> >>>>> Ankit Singhal
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <
> > > >> >> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is
> > someone
> > > >> >> >>> working
> > > >> >> >>>> on
> > > >> >> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>> Are these the only two?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> >> >>>>>> James
> > > >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
> > > >> >> >>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working
> > on
> > > >> patch
> > > >> >> >>>> and
> > > >> >> >>>>> I
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> Thomas
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> > > >> >> >>>>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are
> resolved.
> > > Let
> > > >> me
> > > >> >> >>>>> bring
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> the
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> RC soon.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;> <
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8
> > > blocker
> > > >> >> >>> for
> > > >> >> >>>>>> them
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> but
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't
> lose
> > > >> >> >>> track
> > > >> >> >>>>> of
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> it.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> If
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>" <
> > > >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>;
> > Mujtaba
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Chohan
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
> > > >> >> >>> Would
> > > >> >> >>>> it
> > > >> >> >>>>> be
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> possible
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
> > > >> >> >>>> targeted
> > > >> >> >>>>>> for
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> James
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
> > > >> >> >>>> elserj@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
> > > >> >> >>> this
> > > >> >> >>>>> broke
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> PQS
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build
> time
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> (hopefully,
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
> > > >> >> >>> Working
> > > >> >> >>>> on
> > > >> >> >>>>>> it.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
> > > >> >> >>>> important
> > > >> >> >>>>> to
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> get
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> it.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<
> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>"<
> > > >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>;
> > > >> >> >>>>>> Samarth
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jain<
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>;
> > > >> >> >>> Rajeshbabu
> > > >> >> >>>>> Chintaguntla<
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> > > >> >> >>>>> D'Silva<
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ;
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com
> > <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
> > > >> >> >>> ready
> > > >> >> >>>>> with
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> review
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop
> with
> > > >> >> >>>>> cascade)
> > > >> >> >>>>>> on
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix
> for
> > > >> >> >>>> local
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> index
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
> > > >> >> >>> latest
> > > >> >> >>>>> patch
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> on
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
> > > >> >> >>> Rajesh
> > > >> >> >>>>> are
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> in
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> transit
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> > > >> >> >>>>>> samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040
> that
> > I
> > > >> >> >>>> have
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> checked
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch
> release,
> > if
> > > >> >> >>>>>> needed.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of
> > are:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > >> >> >>>> 99
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<
> larsh@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get
> > in.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org
> > <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker
> as
> > of
> > > >> >> >>>> now.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> Will
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> work
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
> > > >> >> >>> phoenix
> > > >> >> >>>>>> config
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>> or
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to
> > opportunistically
> > > >> >> >>> get
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
> > > >> >> >>> possible
> > > >> >> >>>> to
> > > >> >> >>>>>>> update
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> this
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
> > > >> >> >>> could
> > > >> >> >>>>>> commit
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> there
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do
> > it
> > > >> >> >>> for
> > > >> >> >>>>>> you),
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>> that
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> be
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>>
> > > >> >> >>>>
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
If you don't have time today, Ankit (as its getting late in India) perhaps
Mujtaba may be able to cut the RCs this morning US time?
On Wednesday, July 13, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, it is already committed.. I'll try to get the RC today.
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:43 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok - would it be possible to get an RC up today once PHOENIX-3021 is
> > checked in?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ankit Singhal <ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > As per description, PHOENIX-3021 seems to be a serious issue with local
> > > index. As the fix is almost there, we can wait for it, if others agree
> > on
> > > same.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Builds look good now. Should Sergey commit PHOENIX-3021? Or should we
> > >> proceed with RC without it?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> James
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, James Taylor <
> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing
> > >> issues,
> > >> > mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the
> > IndexTool.
> > >> > Hopefully we're good to go now.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > James
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang <
> > >> > simon.wang@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Thanks, James!
> > >> >> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much
> > >> more
> > >> >> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for
> > >> jumping
> > >> >> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix
> > >> codebase,
> > >> >> and look to make more contributions in future!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Best,
> > >> >> Tongzhou (Simon)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <
> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead
> with
> > >> the
> > >> >> RC
> > >> >> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thanks,
> > >> >> > James
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <
> > >> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> > wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> > >> >> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
> > >> >> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <
> > >> >> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there
> anything
> > >> >> missing?
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>> Thanks,
> > >> >> >>>> James
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <
> > >> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> > >> >> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to
> > >> check
> > >> >> >>>> whether
> > >> >> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has
> > uncovered
> > >> >> some
> > >> >> >>>> old
> > >> >> >>>>> bugs.
> > >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments,
> > will
> > >> >> >>> upload
> > >> >> >>>>> patch soon.
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>> Regards,
> > >> >> >>>>> Ankit Singhal
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <
> > >> >> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is
> someone
> > >> >> >>> working
> > >> >> >>>> on
> > >> >> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
> > >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>> Are these the only two?
> > >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> >> >>>>>> James
> > >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
> > >> >> >>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working
> on
> > >> patch
> > >> >> >>>> and
> > >> >> >>>>> I
> > >> >> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> >> >>>>>>> Thomas
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> > >> >> >>>>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved.
> > Let
> > >> me
> > >> >> >>>>> bring
> > >> >> >>>>>>> the
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> RC soon.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;> <
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> > >> >> >>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8
> > blocker
> > >> >> >>> for
> > >> >> >>>>>> them
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> but
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
> > >> >> >>> track
> > >> >> >>>>> of
> > >> >> >>>>>>> it.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> If
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>" <
> > >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>;
> Mujtaba
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Chohan
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
> > >> >> >>> Would
> > >> >> >>>> it
> > >> >> >>>>> be
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> possible
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
> > >> >> >>>> targeted
> > >> >> >>>>>> for
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> James
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
> > >> >> >>>> elserj@apache.org <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
> > >> >> >>> this
> > >> >> >>>>> broke
> > >> >> >>>>>>> PQS
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> > >> >> >>>>>>> (hopefully,
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
> > >> >> >>> Working
> > >> >> >>>> on
> > >> >> >>>>>> it.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
> > >> >> >>>> important
> > >> >> >>>>> to
> > >> >> >>>>>>> get
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> it.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>"<
> > >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>;
> > >> >> >>>>>> Samarth
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jain<
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>;
> > >> >> >>> Rajeshbabu
> > >> >> >>>>> Chintaguntla<
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> > >> >> >>>>> D'Silva<
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ;
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com
> <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
> > >> >> >>> ready
> > >> >> >>>>> with
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> review
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
> > >> >> >>>>> cascade)
> > >> >> >>>>>> on
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
> > >> >> >>>> local
> > >> >> >>>>>>> index
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
> > >> >> >>> latest
> > >> >> >>>>> patch
> > >> >> >>>>>>> on
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
> > >> >> >>> Rajesh
> > >> >> >>>>> are
> > >> >> >>>>>>> in
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> transit
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> > >> >> >>>>>> samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that
> I
> > >> >> >>>> have
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> checked
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release,
> if
> > >> >> >>>>>> needed.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of
> are:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > >> >> >>>> 99
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get
> in.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org
> <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as
> of
> > >> >> >>>> now.
> > >> >> >>>>>>> Will
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> work
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
> > >> >> >>> phoenix
> > >> >> >>>>>> config
> > >> >> >>>>>>>> or
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to
> opportunistically
> > >> >> >>> get
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
> > >> >> >>> possible
> > >> >> >>>> to
> > >> >> >>>>>>> update
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> this
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
> > >> >> >>> could
> > >> >> >>>>>> commit
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> there
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do
> it
> > >> >> >>> for
> > >> >> >>>>>> you),
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>> that
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> be
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
Yes, it is already committed.. I'll try to get the RC today.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:43 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Ok - would it be possible to get an RC up today once PHOENIX-3021 is
> checked in?
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > As per description, PHOENIX-3021 seems to be a serious issue with local
> > index. As the fix is almost there, we can wait for it, if others agree
> on
> > same.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Builds look good now. Should Sergey commit PHOENIX-3021? Or should we
> >> proceed with RC without it?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> James
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing
> >> issues,
> >> > mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the
> IndexTool.
> >> > Hopefully we're good to go now.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > James
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang <
> >> > simon.wang@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Thanks, James!
> >> >> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much
> >> more
> >> >> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for
> >> jumping
> >> >> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix
> >> codebase,
> >> >> and look to make more contributions in future!
> >> >>
> >> >> Best,
> >> >> Tongzhou (Simon)
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with
> >> the
> >> >> RC
> >> >> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > James
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <
> >> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> >> >> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
> >> >> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <
> >> >> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything
> >> >> missing?
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>>> James
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <
> >> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> >> >> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to
> >> check
> >> >> >>>> whether
> >> >> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has
> uncovered
> >> >> some
> >> >> >>>> old
> >> >> >>>>> bugs.
> >> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments,
> will
> >> >> >>> upload
> >> >> >>>>> patch soon.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Regards,
> >> >> >>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <
> >> >> jamestaylor@apache.org
> >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone
> >> >> >>> working
> >> >> >>>> on
> >> >> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Are these the only two?
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>>>>> James
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
> >> >> >>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com
> >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on
> >> patch
> >> >> >>>> and
> >> >> >>>>> I
> >> >> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>>>>>> Thomas
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> >> >> >>>>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved.
> Let
> >> me
> >> >> >>>>> bring
> >> >> >>>>>>> the
> >> >> >>>>>>>> RC soon.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
> >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;> <
> >> >> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> >> >> >>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8
> blocker
> >> >> >>> for
> >> >> >>>>>> them
> >> >> >>>>>>>> but
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
> >> >> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
> >> >> >>> track
> >> >> >>>>> of
> >> >> >>>>>>> it.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> If
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
> >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Chohan
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
> >> >> >>> Would
> >> >> >>>> it
> >> >> >>>>> be
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> possible
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
> >> >> >>>> targeted
> >> >> >>>>>> for
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> James
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
> >> >> >>>> elserj@apache.org
> >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
> >> >> >>> this
> >> >> >>>>> broke
> >> >> >>>>>>> PQS
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> >> >> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> >> >> >>>>>>> (hopefully,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
> >> >> >>> Working
> >> >> >>>> on
> >> >> >>>>>> it.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
> >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
> >> >> >>>> important
> >> >> >>>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>> get
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> it.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
> >> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
> >> >> >>>>>> Samarth
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Jain<
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
> >> >> >>> Rajeshbabu
> >> >> >>>>> Chintaguntla<
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> >> >> >>>>> D'Silva<
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ;
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
> >> >> >>> ready
> >> >> >>>>> with
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> review
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
> >> >> >>>>> cascade)
> >> >> >>>>>> on
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
> >> >> >>>> local
> >> >> >>>>>>> index
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
> >> >> >>> latest
> >> >> >>>>> patch
> >> >> >>>>>>> on
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
> >> >> >>> Rajesh
> >> >> >>>>> are
> >> >> >>>>>>> in
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> transit
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> >> >> >>>>>> samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
> >> >> >>>> have
> >> >> >>>>>>>> checked
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
> >> >> >>>>>> needed.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >> >> >>>> 99
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
> >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
> >> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
> >> >> >>>> now.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Will
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> work
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
> >> >> >>> phoenix
> >> >> >>>>>> config
> >> >> >>>>>>>> or
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
> >> >> >>> get
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
> >> >> >>> possible
> >> >> >>>> to
> >> >> >>>>>>> update
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> this
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
> >> >> >>> could
> >> >> >>>>>> commit
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> there
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
> >> >> >>> for
> >> >> >>>>>> you),
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> that
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> be
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
Ok - would it be possible to get an RC up today once PHOENIX-3021 is
checked in?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> As per description, PHOENIX-3021 seems to be a serious issue with local
> index. As the fix is almost there, we can wait for it, if others agree on
> same.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Builds look good now. Should Sergey commit PHOENIX-3021? Or should we
>> proceed with RC without it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> James
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing
>> issues,
>> > mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the IndexTool.
>> > Hopefully we're good to go now.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > James
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang <
>> > simon.wang@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks, James!
>> >> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much
>> more
>> >> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for
>> jumping
>> >> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix
>> codebase,
>> >> and look to make more contributions in future!
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Tongzhou (Simon)
>> >>
>> >> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with
>> the
>> >> RC
>> >> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > James
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <
>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <
>> >> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
>> >> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <
>> >> jamestaylor@apache.org>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything
>> >> missing?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>> James
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <
>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
>> >> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to
>> check
>> >> >>>> whether
>> >> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered
>> >> some
>> >> >>>> old
>> >> >>>>> bugs.
>> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will
>> >> >>> upload
>> >> >>>>> patch soon.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Regards,
>> >> >>>>> Ankit Singhal
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <
>> >> jamestaylor@apache.org
>> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone
>> >> >>> working
>> >> >>>> on
>> >> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Are these the only two?
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>>> James
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
>> >> >>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com
>> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on
>> patch
>> >> >>>> and
>> >> >>>>> I
>> >> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>>>> Thomas
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
>> >> >>>>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let
>> me
>> >> >>>>> bring
>> >> >>>>>>> the
>> >> >>>>>>>> RC soon.
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
>> >> >>>>> <javascript:;> <
>> >> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
>> >> >>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker
>> >> >>> for
>> >> >>>>>> them
>> >> >>>>>>>> but
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
>> >> >>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
>> >> >>> track
>> >> >>>>> of
>> >> >>>>>>> it.
>> >> >>>>>>>> If
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
>> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
>> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Chohan
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> <
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
>> >> >>> Would
>> >> >>>> it
>> >> >>>>> be
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> possible
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
>> >> >>>> targeted
>> >> >>>>>> for
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> James
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
>> >> >>>> elserj@apache.org
>> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
>> >> >>> this
>> >> >>>>> broke
>> >> >>>>>>> PQS
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
>> >> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time
>> >> >>>>>>> (hopefully,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
>> >> >>> Working
>> >> >>>> on
>> >> >>>>>> it.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
>> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
>> >> >>>> important
>> >> >>>>> to
>> >> >>>>>>> get
>> >> >>>>>>>>> it.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
>> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
>> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
>> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
>> >> >>>>>> Samarth
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Jain<
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
>> >> >>> Rajeshbabu
>> >> >>>>> Chintaguntla<
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
>> >> >>>>> D'Silva<
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ;
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
>> >> >>> ready
>> >> >>>>> with
>> >> >>>>>>>>> review
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
>> >> >>>>> cascade)
>> >> >>>>>> on
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
>> >> >>>> local
>> >> >>>>>>> index
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
>> >> >>> latest
>> >> >>>>> patch
>> >> >>>>>>> on
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
>> >> >>> Rajesh
>> >> >>>>> are
>> >> >>>>>>> in
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> transit
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
>> >> >>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
>> >> >>>>>> samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
>> >> >>>> have
>> >> >>>>>>>> checked
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> in.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
>> >> >>>>>> needed.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>> >> >>>> 99
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
>> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
>> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
>> >> >>>> now.
>> >> >>>>>>> Will
>> >> >>>>>>>>> work
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
>> >> >>> phoenix
>> >> >>>>>> config
>> >> >>>>>>>> or
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
>> >> >>> get
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
>> >> >>> possible
>> >> >>>> to
>> >> >>>>>>> update
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> this
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
>> >> >>> could
>> >> >>>>>> commit
>> >> >>>>>>>>> there
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
>> >> >>> for
>> >> >>>>>> you),
>> >> >>>>>>>>> that
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> be
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
As per description, PHOENIX-3021 seems to be a serious issue with local
index. As the fix is almost there, we can wait for it, if others agree on
same.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Builds look good now. Should Sergey commit PHOENIX-3021? Or should we
> proceed with RC without it?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing issues,
> > mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the IndexTool.
> > Hopefully we're good to go now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang <
> > simon.wang@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks, James!
> >> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much more
> >> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for
> jumping
> >> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix codebase,
> >> and look to make more contributions in future!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Tongzhou (Simon)
> >>
> >> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with the
> >> RC
> >> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > James
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> >> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
> >> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <
> >> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything
> >> missing?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>> James
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> >> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to
> check
> >> >>>> whether
> >> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered
> >> some
> >> >>>> old
> >> >>>>> bugs.
> >> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will
> >> >>> upload
> >> >>>>> patch soon.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <
> >> jamestaylor@apache.org
> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone
> >> >>> working
> >> >>>> on
> >> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Are these the only two?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>> James
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
> >> >>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com
> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on
> patch
> >> >>>> and
> >> >>>>> I
> >> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>>> Thomas
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> >> >>>>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let
> me
> >> >>>>> bring
> >> >>>>>>> the
> >> >>>>>>>> RC soon.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
> >> >>>>> <javascript:;> <
> >> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> >> >>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker
> >> >>> for
> >> >>>>>> them
> >> >>>>>>>> but
> >> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
> >> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
> >> >>> track
> >> >>>>> of
> >> >>>>>>> it.
> >> >>>>>>>> If
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
> >> >>>>>>>>> Chohan
> >> >>>>>>>>>> <
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
> >> >>> Would
> >> >>>> it
> >> >>>>> be
> >> >>>>>>>>>> possible
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
> >> >>>> targeted
> >> >>>>>> for
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> James
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
> >> >>>> elserj@apache.org
> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
> >> >>> this
> >> >>>>> broke
> >> >>>>>>> PQS
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> >> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> >> >>>>>>> (hopefully,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
> >> >>> Working
> >> >>>> on
> >> >>>>>> it.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
> >> >>>> important
> >> >>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>> get
> >> >>>>>>>>> it.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
> >> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
> >> >>>>>> Samarth
> >> >>>>>>>>> Jain<
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
> >> >>> Rajeshbabu
> >> >>>>> Chintaguntla<
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> >> >>>>> D'Silva<
> >> >>>>>>>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> ;
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
> >> >>> ready
> >> >>>>> with
> >> >>>>>>>>> review
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
> >> >>>>> cascade)
> >> >>>>>> on
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
> >> >>>> local
> >> >>>>>>> index
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
> >> >>> latest
> >> >>>>> patch
> >> >>>>>>> on
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
> >> >>> Rajesh
> >> >>>>> are
> >> >>>>>>> in
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> transit
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> >> >>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> >> >>>>>> samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
> >> >>>> have
> >> >>>>>>>> checked
> >> >>>>>>>>>> in.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
> >> >>>>>> needed.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >> >>>> 99
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
> >> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
> >> >>>> now.
> >> >>>>>>> Will
> >> >>>>>>>>> work
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
> >> >>> phoenix
> >> >>>>>> config
> >> >>>>>>>> or
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
> >> >>> get
> >> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
> >> >>> possible
> >> >>>> to
> >> >>>>>>> update
> >> >>>>>>>>>> this
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
> >> >>> could
> >> >>>>>> commit
> >> >>>>>>>>> there
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
> >> >>> for
> >> >>>>>> you),
> >> >>>>>>>>> that
> >> >>>>>>>>>> be
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
Builds look good now. Should Sergey commit PHOENIX-3021? Or should we
proceed with RC without it?
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing issues,
> mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the IndexTool.
> Hopefully we're good to go now.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang <
> simon.wang@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, James!
>> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much more
>> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for jumping
>> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix codebase,
>> and look to make more contributions in future!
>>
>> Best,
>> Tongzhou (Simon)
>>
>> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with the
>> RC
>> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > James
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <
>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
>> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <
>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything
>> missing?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> James
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
>> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check
>> >>>> whether
>> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered
>> some
>> >>>> old
>> >>>>> bugs.
>> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will
>> >>> upload
>> >>>>> patch soon.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>> Ankit Singhal
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <
>> jamestaylor@apache.org
>> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone
>> >>> working
>> >>>> on
>> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Are these the only two?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>> James
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
>> >>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com
>> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch
>> >>>> and
>> >>>>> I
>> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>> Thomas
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
>> >>>>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me
>> >>>>> bring
>> >>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> RC soon.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
>> >>>>> <javascript:;> <
>> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
>> >>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker
>> >>> for
>> >>>>>> them
>> >>>>>>>> but
>> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
>> >>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
>> >>> track
>> >>>>> of
>> >>>>>>> it.
>> >>>>>>>> If
>> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
>> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
>> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
>> >>>>>>>>> Chohan
>> >>>>>>>>>> <
>> >>>>>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
>> >>> Would
>> >>>> it
>> >>>>> be
>> >>>>>>>>>> possible
>> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
>> >>>> targeted
>> >>>>>> for
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
>> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> James
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
>> >>>> elserj@apache.org
>> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
>> >>> this
>> >>>>> broke
>> >>>>>>> PQS
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
>> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time
>> >>>>>>> (hopefully,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
>> >>> Working
>> >>>> on
>> >>>>>> it.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
>> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
>> >>>> important
>> >>>>> to
>> >>>>>>> get
>> >>>>>>>>> it.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
>> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
>> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
>> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
>> >>>>>> Samarth
>> >>>>>>>>> Jain<
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
>> >>> Rajeshbabu
>> >>>>> Chintaguntla<
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
>> >>>>> D'Silva<
>> >>>>>>>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ;
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
>> >>> ready
>> >>>>> with
>> >>>>>>>>> review
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
>> >>>>> cascade)
>> >>>>>> on
>> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
>> >>>> local
>> >>>>>>> index
>> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
>> >>> latest
>> >>>>> patch
>> >>>>>>> on
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
>> >>> Rajesh
>> >>>>> are
>> >>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>>>> transit
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
>> >>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
>> >>>>>> samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
>> >>>> have
>> >>>>>>>> checked
>> >>>>>>>>>> in.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
>> >>>>>> needed.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>> >>>> 99
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
>> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
>> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
>> >>>> now.
>> >>>>>>> Will
>> >>>>>>>>> work
>> >>>>>>>>>>> on
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
>> >>> phoenix
>> >>>>>> config
>> >>>>>>>> or
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
>> >>> get
>> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
>> >>> possible
>> >>>> to
>> >>>>>>> update
>> >>>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
>> >>> could
>> >>>>>> commit
>> >>>>>>>>> there
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
>> >>> for
>> >>>>>> you),
>> >>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>>>> be
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
No problem, Tongzhou. I think your change uncovered some existing issues,
mainly environmental issues at test-time in shutting down the IndexTool.
Hopefully we're good to go now.
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Simon Wang <si...@airbnb.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Thanks, James!
> I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much more
> complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for jumping
> in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix codebase,
> and look to make more contributions in future!
>
> Best,
> Tongzhou (Simon)
>
> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with the RC
> > unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
> >>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything
> missing?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> James
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> >>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check
> >>>> whether
> >>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered
> some
> >>>> old
> >>>>> bugs.
> >>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will
> >>> upload
> >>>>> patch soon.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <
> jamestaylor@apache.org
> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone
> >>> working
> >>>> on
> >>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Are these the only two?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> James
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
> >>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com
> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch
> >>>> and
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Thomas
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> >>>>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me
> >>>>> bring
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> RC soon.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
> >>>>> <javascript:;> <
> >>>>>>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> >>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker
> >>> for
> >>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
> >>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
> >>> track
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>> If
> >>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
> >>>>>>>>> Chohan
> >>>>>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
> >>> Would
> >>>> it
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>> possible
> >>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
> >>>> targeted
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> >>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>> James
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
> >>>> elserj@apache.org
> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
> >>> this
> >>>>> broke
> >>>>>>> PQS
> >>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> >>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
> >>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> >>>>>>> (hopefully,
> >>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
> >>> Working
> >>>> on
> >>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
> >>>> important
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>> get
> >>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
> >>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
> >>>>>> Samarth
> >>>>>>>>> Jain<
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
> >>> Rajeshbabu
> >>>>> Chintaguntla<
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> >>>>> D'Silva<
> >>>>>>>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
> >>> ready
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>> review
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
> >>>>> cascade)
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
> >>>> local
> >>>>>>> index
> >>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
> >>> latest
> >>>>> patch
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
> >>> Rajesh
> >>>>> are
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>> transit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> >>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> >>>>>> samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
> >>>> have
> >>>>>>>> checked
> >>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
> >>>>>> needed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >>>> 99
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
> >>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
> >>>>> <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
> >>>> now.
> >>>>>>> Will
> >>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
> >>> phoenix
> >>>>>> config
> >>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
> >>> get
> >>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
> >>> possible
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>> update
> >>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
> >>> could
> >>>>>> commit
> >>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
> >>> for
> >>>>>> you),
> >>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Simon Wang <si...@airbnb.com.INVALID>.
Thanks, James!
I thought PHOENIX-3061 would be a simple change, but it became much more complex than I imagined. Thank you, Thomas, Mujtaba, and Ankit for jumping in and helping fixing the issues. I will keep studying Phoenix codebase, and look to make more contributions in future!
Best,
Tongzhou (Simon)
> On Jul 13, 2016, at 12:48 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with the RC
> unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
>>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything missing?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
>>>>> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check
>>>> whether
>>>>> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some
>>>> old
>>>>> bugs.
>>>>> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will
>>> upload
>>>>> patch soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone
>>> working
>>>> on
>>>>>> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are these the only two?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch
>>>> and
>>>>> I
>>>>>>> should be able to get it committed soon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
>>>>> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me
>>>>> bring
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> RC soon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;> <
>>>>>>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Rajeshbabu.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker
>>> for
>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>> good to have if a fix is easy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
>>> track
>>>>> of
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>>> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
>>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
>>>>>>>>> Chohan
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>> mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
>>> Would
>>>> it
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>>>>> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
>>>> targeted
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
>>>> elserj@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
>>> this
>>>>> broke
>>>>>>> PQS
>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
>>>>>>>> o.a.phoenix.shaded
>>>>>>>>>>>> package). Might just be something to fix at build time
>>>>>>> (hopefully,
>>>>>>>>>>> anyways)
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm looking at it now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
>>> Working
>>>> on
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
>>>> important
>>>>> to
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
>>>>> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
>>>>>> Samarth
>>>>>>>>> Jain<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
>>> Rajeshbabu
>>>>> Chintaguntla<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
>>>>> D'Silva<
>>>>>>>>>> tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
>>> ready
>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> review
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
>>>>> cascade)
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> cluster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
>>>> local
>>>>>>> index
>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
>>> latest
>>>>> patch
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3002.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
>>> Rajesh
>>>>> are
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> transit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
>>>>>> samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
>>>> have
>>>>>>>> checked
>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>>>> 99
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
>>>> now.
>>>>>>> Will
>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
>>> phoenix
>>>>>> config
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
>>> get
>>>>>>>>>> PHOENIX-3035
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
>>> possible
>>>> to
>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daily
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
>>> could
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
>>> for
>>>>>> you),
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
Ok, fix checked in. If we get a clean build, let's move ahead with the RC
unless anyone knows of any other blockers.
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
>> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything missing?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > James
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
>> > > After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check
>> > whether
>> > > the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some
>> > old
>> > > bugs.
>> > > PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will
>> upload
>> > > patch soon.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Ankit Singhal
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone
>> working
>> > on
>> > > > it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
>> > > >
>> > > > Are these the only two?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > James
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
>> > tdsilva@salesforce.com
>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch
>> > and
>> > > I
>> > > > > should be able to get it committed soon.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Thomas
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
>> > > ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me
>> > > bring
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > RC soon.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > Ankit Singhal
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
>> > > <javascript:;> <
>> > > > > > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > Rajeshbabu.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
>> > > > > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker
>> for
>> > > > them
>> > > > > > but
>> > > > > > > > good to have if a fix is easy.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
>> > <javascript:;>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
>> track
>> > > of
>> > > > > it.
>> > > > > > If
>> > > > > > > > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
>> > > > > > > > > *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
>> > > dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
>> > > > > > > Chohan
>> > > > > > > > <
>> > > > > > > > > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release?
>> Would
>> > it
>> > > be
>> > > > > > > > possible
>> > > > > > > > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
>> > targeted
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
>> > > > > > > > > a blocker?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > James
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
>> > elserj@apache.org
>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like
>> this
>> > > broke
>> > > > > PQS
>> > > > > > > > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
>> > > > > > o.a.phoenix.shaded
>> > > > > > > > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time
>> > > > > (hopefully,
>> > > > > > > > > anyways)
>> > > > > > > > > > -- I'm looking at it now.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release.
>> Working
>> > on
>> > > > it.
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
>> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
>> > important
>> > > to
>> > > > > get
>> > > > > > > it.
>> > > > > > > > > >>> -- Lars
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
>> > > dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
>> > > > Samarth
>> > > > > > > Jain<
>> > > > > > > > > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
>> Rajeshbabu
>> > > Chintaguntla<
>> > > > > > > > > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
>> > > D'Silva<
>> > > > > > > > tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
>> > > > > > > > > >;
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
>> ready
>> > > with
>> > > > > > > review
>> > > > > > > > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
>> > > cascade)
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > cluster.
>> > > > > > > > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
>> > local
>> > > > > index
>> > > > > > > > > upgrade
>> > > > > > > > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with
>> latest
>> > > patch
>> > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
>> > > > > > > > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
>> Rajesh
>> > > are
>> > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > transit
>> > > > > > > > > >>> for 2 days.
>> > > > > > > > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Regards,
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Ankit Singhal
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
>> > > > > > > jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> How we looking for the RC?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
>> > > > samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
>> > have
>> > > > > > checked
>> > > > > > > > in.
>> > > > > > > > > I
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
>> > > > needed.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>> >99
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
>> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> -- Lars
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
>> > now.
>> > > > > Will
>> > > > > > > work
>> > > > > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> this
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
>> phoenix
>> > > > config
>> > > > > > or
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> something
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> more.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
>> get
>> > > > > > > > PHOENIX-3035
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> in.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be
>> possible
>> > to
>> > > > > update
>> > > > > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> daily
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
>> could
>> > > > commit
>> > > > > > > there
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
>> for
>> > > > you),
>> > > > > > > that
>> > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> much
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> appreciated.
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> James
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at it now. Stay tuned.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
> @Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything missing?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> > > After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check
> > whether
> > > the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some
> > old
> > > bugs.
> > > PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will
> upload
> > > patch soon.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ankit Singhal
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone working
> > on
> > > > it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
> > > >
> > > > Are these the only two?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
> > tdsilva@salesforce.com
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch
> > and
> > > I
> > > > > should be able to get it committed soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Thomas
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> > > ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me
> > > bring
> > > > > the
> > > > > > RC soon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Ankit Singhal
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;> <
> > > > > > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> > > > > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker
> for
> > > > them
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > good to have if a fix is easy.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose
> track
> > > of
> > > > > it.
> > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
> > > dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
> > > > > > > Chohan
> > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would
> > it
> > > be
> > > > > > > > possible
> > > > > > > > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
> > targeted
> > > > for
> > > > > > > > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > > > > > > > > a blocker?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > James
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
> > elserj@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this
> > > broke
> > > > > PQS
> > > > > > > > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> > > > > > o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > > > > > > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> > > > > (hopefully,
> > > > > > > > > anyways)
> > > > > > > > > > -- I'm looking at it now.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working
> > on
> > > > it.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
> > important
> > > to
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > it.
> > > > > > > > > >>> -- Lars
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
> > > dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
> > > > Samarth
> > > > > > > Jain<
> > > > > > > > > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>;
> Rajeshbabu
> > > Chintaguntla<
> > > > > > > > > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> > > D'Silva<
> > > > > > > > tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > > > > > >;
> > > > > > > > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > > > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are
> ready
> > > with
> > > > > > > review
> > > > > > > > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
> > > cascade)
> > > > on
> > > > > > > > > cluster.
> > > > > > > > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
> > local
> > > > > index
> > > > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest
> > > patch
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > > > > > > > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and
> Rajesh
> > > are
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > transit
> > > > > > > > > >>> for 2 days.
> > > > > > > > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > > > > > > >>> Ankit Singhal
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > > > > jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> How we looking for the RC?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> > > > samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
> > have
> > > > > > checked
> > > > > > > > in.
> > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
> > > > needed.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >99
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> -- Lars
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
> > now.
> > > > > Will
> > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> this
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning
> phoenix
> > > > config
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> something
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> more.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically
> get
> > > > > > > > PHOENIX-3035
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> in.
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible
> > to
> > > > > update
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> daily
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks
> could
> > > > commit
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it
> for
> > > > you),
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> much
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> appreciated.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> James
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
Yes James , But there are test failures after PHOENIX-3061.
@Thomas/Mujtaba, would you mind helping Tongzhou on the same.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything missing?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> > After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check
> whether
> > the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some
> old
> > bugs.
> > PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will upload
> > patch soon.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ankit Singhal
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone working
> on
> > > it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
> > >
> > > Are these the only two?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <
> tdsilva@salesforce.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch
> and
> > I
> > > > should be able to get it committed soon.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> > ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me
> > bring
> > > > the
> > > > > RC soon.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ankit Singhal
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
> > <javascript:;> <
> > > > > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> > > > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for
> > > them
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > good to have if a fix is easy.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track
> > of
> > > > it.
> > > > > If
> > > > > > > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > > *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
> > dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
> > > > > > Chohan
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would
> it
> > be
> > > > > > > possible
> > > > > > > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being
> targeted
> > > for
> > > > > > > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > > > > > > > a blocker?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > James
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <
> elserj@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this
> > broke
> > > > PQS
> > > > > > > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> > > > > o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > > > > > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> > > > (hopefully,
> > > > > > > > anyways)
> > > > > > > > > -- I'm looking at it now.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working
> on
> > > it.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems
> important
> > to
> > > > get
> > > > > > it.
> > > > > > > > >>> -- Lars
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > >>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
> > dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
> > > Samarth
> > > > > > Jain<
> > > > > > > > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Rajeshbabu
> > Chintaguntla<
> > > > > > > > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> > D'Silva<
> > > > > > > tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > > > > >;
> > > > > > > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready
> > with
> > > > > > review
> > > > > > > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
> > cascade)
> > > on
> > > > > > > > cluster.
> > > > > > > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for
> local
> > > > index
> > > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest
> > patch
> > > > on
> > > > > > > > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > > > > > > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh
> > are
> > > > in
> > > > > > > > transit
> > > > > > > > >>> for 2 days.
> > > > > > > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > > > > > >>> Ankit Singhal
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > > > jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> How we looking for the RC?
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> > > samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I
> have
> > > > > checked
> > > > > > > in.
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
> > > needed.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > > > > > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> -- Lars
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of
> now.
> > > > Will
> > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> this
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix
> > > config
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> something
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> more.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get
> > > > > > > PHOENIX-3035
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> in.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible
> to
> > > > update
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> daily
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could
> > > commit
> > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for
> > > you),
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> much
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> appreciated.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> James
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
I think we're ready for the RC now, Ankit. Or is there anything missing?
Thanks,
James
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check whether
> the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some old
> bugs.
> PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will upload
> patch soon.
>
> Regards,
> Ankit Singhal
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone working on
> > it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
> >
> > Are these the only two?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <tdsilva@salesforce.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch and
> I
> > > should be able to get it committed soon.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <
> ankitsinghal59@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me
> bring
> > > the
> > > > RC soon.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ankit Singhal
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org
> <javascript:;> <
> > > > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> > > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for
> > them
> > > > but
> > > > > > good to have if a fix is easy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track
> of
> > > it.
> > > > If
> > > > > > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > *From:* James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>" <
> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba
> > > > > Chohan
> > > > > > <
> > > > > > > mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it
> be
> > > > > > possible
> > > > > > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted
> > for
> > > > > > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > > > > > > a blocker?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > James
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this
> broke
> > > PQS
> > > > > > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> > > > o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > > > > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> > > (hopefully,
> > > > > > > anyways)
> > > > > > > > -- I'm looking at it now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > rajeshbabu@apache.org <javascript:;> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on
> > it.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<larsh@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important
> to
> > > get
> > > > > it.
> > > > > > > >>> -- Lars
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >>> To: James Taylor<jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>"<
> dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>;
> > Samarth
> > > > > Jain<
> > > > > > > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>; Rajeshbabu
> Chintaguntla<
> > > > > > > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> D'Silva<
> > > > > > tdsilva@salesforce.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > > > >;
> > > > > > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mchohan@salesforce.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready
> with
> > > > > review
> > > > > > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with
> cascade)
> > on
> > > > > > > cluster.
> > > > > > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local
> > > index
> > > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest
> patch
> > > on
> > > > > > > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > > > > > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh
> are
> > > in
> > > > > > > transit
> > > > > > > >>> for 2 days.
> > > > > > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > > > > >>> Ankit Singhal
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > > jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> How we looking for the RC?
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> > samarth.jain@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have
> > > > checked
> > > > > > in.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
> > needed.
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > > > > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<larsh@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > > > > > >>>>>> -- Lars
> > > > > > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<samarth@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> To: dev<dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now.
> > > Will
> > > > > work
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> this
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix
> > config
> > > > or
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> something
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> more.
> > > > > > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get
> > > > > > PHOENIX-3035
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> in.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to
> > > update
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> daily
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could
> > commit
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for
> > you),
> > > > > that
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> much
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> appreciated.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> James
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check whether
the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some old
bugs.
PHOENIX-3045, I have started working on the review comments, will upload
patch soon.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone working on
> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
>
> Are these the only two?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch and I
> > should be able to get it committed soon.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <ankitsinghal59@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me bring
> > the
> > > RC soon.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ankit Singhal
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> > > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> > mchohan@salesforce.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for
> them
> > > but
> > > > > good to have if a fix is easy.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track of
> > it.
> > > If
> > > > > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > *From:* James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Mujtaba
> > > > Chohan
> > > > > <
> > > > > > mchohan@salesforce.com>
> > > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be
> > > > > possible
> > > > > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted
> for
> > > > > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > > > > > a blocker?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > James
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke
> > PQS
> > > > > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> > > o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > > > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> > (hopefully,
> > > > > > anyways)
> > > > > > > -- I'm looking at it now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on
> it.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to
> > get
> > > > it.
> > > > > > >>> -- Lars
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>;
> Samarth
> > > > Jain<
> > > > > > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
> > > > > > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<
> > > > > tdsilva@salesforce.com
> > > > > > >;
> > > > > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
> > > > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with
> > > > review
> > > > > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade)
> on
> > > > > > cluster.
> > > > > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local
> > index
> > > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch
> > on
> > > > > > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > > > > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are
> > in
> > > > > > transit
> > > > > > >>> for 2 days.
> > > > > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > > > >>> Ankit Singhal
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> How we looking for the RC?
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<
> samarth.jain@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have
> > > checked
> > > > > in.
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if
> needed.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > > > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > > > > >>>>>> -- Lars
> > > > > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now.
> > Will
> > > > work
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> this
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix
> config
> > > or
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> something
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> more.
> > > > > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get
> > > > > PHOENIX-3035
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> in.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to
> > update
> > > > > this
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> daily
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could
> commit
> > > > there
> > > > > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for
> you),
> > > > that
> > > > > be
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> much
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> appreciated.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>>>>> James
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone working on
it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
Are these the only two?
Thanks,
James
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com>
wrote:
> We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch and I
> should be able to get it committed soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me bring
> the
> > RC soon.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ankit Singhal
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rajeshbabu.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <
> mchohan@salesforce.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for them
> > but
> > > > good to have if a fix is easy.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track of
> it.
> > If
> > > > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > *From:* James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Mujtaba
> > > Chohan
> > > > <
> > > > > mchohan@salesforce.com>
> > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > > > >
> > > > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > >
> > > > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be
> > > > possible
> > > > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for
> > > > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > > > > a blocker?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > James
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke
> PQS
> > > > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> > o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time
> (hopefully,
> > > > > anyways)
> > > > > > -- I'm looking at it now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to
> get
> > > it.
> > > > > >>> -- Lars
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> > > > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth
> > > Jain<
> > > > > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
> > > > > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<
> > > > tdsilva@salesforce.com
> > > > > >;
> > > > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
> > > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > > > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with
> > > review
> > > > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on
> > > > > cluster.
> > > > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local
> index
> > > > > upgrade
> > > > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch
> on
> > > > > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > > > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are
> in
> > > > > transit
> > > > > >>> for 2 days.
> > > > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > > >>> Ankit Singhal
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> > > jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> How we looking for the RC?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have
> > checked
> > > > in.
> > > > > I
> > > > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > > > >>>>>> -- Lars
> > > > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now.
> Will
> > > work
> > > > > on
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> this
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config
> > or
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> something
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> more.
> > > > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get
> > > > PHOENIX-3035
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> in.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to
> update
> > > > this
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> daily
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit
> > > there
> > > > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you),
> > > that
> > > > be
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> much
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> appreciated.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>>>>> James
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com>.
We should also get PHOENIX-2966 into 4.8. Teja is working on patch and I
should be able to get it committed soon.
Thanks,
Thomas
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me bring the
> RC soon.
>
> Regards,
> Ankit Singhal
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajeshbabu.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for them
> but
> > > good to have if a fix is easy.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track of it.
> If
> > > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > *From:* James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Mujtaba
> > Chohan
> > > <
> > > > mchohan@salesforce.com>
> > > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > > >
> > > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > >
> > > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be
> > > possible
> > > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for
> > > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > > > a blocker?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
> > > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the
> o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully,
> > > > anyways)
> > > > > -- I'm looking at it now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get
> > it.
> > > > >>> -- Lars
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> > > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth
> > Jain<
> > > > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
> > > > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<
> > > tdsilva@salesforce.com
> > > > >;
> > > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
> > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with
> > review
> > > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on
> > > > cluster.
> > > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index
> > > > upgrade
> > > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
> > > > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in
> > > > transit
> > > > >>> for 2 days.
> > > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > >>> Ankit Singhal
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> > jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> How we looking for the RC?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have
> checked
> > > in.
> > > > I
> > > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > > >>>>>> -- Lars
> > > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
> > > > >>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> > > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
> > > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will
> > work
> > > > on
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> this
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config
> or
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> something
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> more.
> > > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get
> > > PHOENIX-3035
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> in.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update
> > > this
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> daily
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit
> > there
> > > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you),
> > that
> > > be
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> much
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> appreciated.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>>> James
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me bring the
RC soon.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for them but
> > good to have if a fix is easy.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track of it. If
> > > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > *From:* James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Mujtaba
> Chohan
> > <
> > > mchohan@salesforce.com>
> > > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> > >
> > > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >
> > > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be
> > possible
> > > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for
> > > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > > a blocker?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
> > > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully,
> > > anyways)
> > > > -- I'm looking at it now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get
> it.
> > > >>> -- Lars
> > > >>>
> > > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> > > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth
> Jain<
> > > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
> > > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<
> > tdsilva@salesforce.com
> > > >;
> > > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
> > > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with
> review
> > > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on
> > > cluster.
> > > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index
> > > upgrade
> > > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
> > > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in
> > > transit
> > > >>> for 2 days.
> > > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Ankit Singhal
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<
> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> How we looking for the RC?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked
> > in.
> > > I
> > > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > >>>>>> -- Lars
> > > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> > > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will
> work
> > > on
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> this
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> something
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> more.
> > > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get
> > PHOENIX-3035
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> in.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update
> > this
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> daily
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit
> there
> > > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you),
> that
> > be
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> much
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> appreciated.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>> James
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by "rajeshbabu@apache.org" <ch...@gmail.com>.
I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
wrote:
> Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for them but
> good to have if a fix is easy.
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track of it. If
> > it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Mujtaba Chohan
> <
> > mchohan@salesforce.com>
> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
> >
> > *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >
> > @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be
> possible
> > to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for
> > 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> > a blocker?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
> > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully,
> > anyways)
> > > -- I'm looking at it now.
> > >
> > >
> > > rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
> > >>> -- Lars
> > >>>
> > >>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
> > >>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> > >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain<
> > >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
> > >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<
> tdsilva@salesforce.com
> > >;
> > >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
> > >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> > >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >>>
> > >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
> > >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on
> > cluster.
> > >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index
> > upgrade
> > >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
> > >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> > >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in
> > transit
> > >>> for 2 days.
> > >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Ankit Singhal
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> How we looking for the RC?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked
> in.
> > I
> > >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > >>>>>> -- Lars
> > >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> > >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work
> > on
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> this
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> something
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> more.
> > >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get
> PHOENIX-3035
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> in.
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > >>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update
> this
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> daily
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> > >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that
> be
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> much
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> appreciated.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>> James
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>.
Was with Brian yesterday, PHOENIX-3056 is not a 4.8 blocker for them but
good to have if a fix is easy.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track of it. If
> it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> *To:* "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Mujtaba Chohan <
> mchohan@salesforce.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: where are we at with the RC?
>
> @Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be possible
> to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for
> 4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
> a blocker?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
> > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded
> > package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully,
> anyways)
> > -- I'm looking at it now.
> >
> >
> > rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
> >
> >> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
> >>> -- Lars
> >>>
> >>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
> >>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> >>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain<
> >>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
> >>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<tdsilva@salesforce.com
> >;
> >>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
> >>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >>>
> >>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
> >>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on
> cluster.
> >>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index
> upgrade
> >>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
> >>> PHOENIX-3002.
> >>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in
> transit
> >>> for 2 days.
> >>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Ankit Singhal
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> How we looking for the RC?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in.
> I
> >>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> >>>>>> -- Lars
> >>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> >>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work
> on
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> this
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> something
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> more.
> >>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> in.
> >>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> daily
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> >>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> much
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> appreciated.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> James
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by la...@apache.org.
I assigned PHOENIX-3056 to 4.8.0, just so we won't lose track of it. If it's not an issue we can move to 4.9.
From: James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
@Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be possible
to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for
4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
a blocker?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded
> package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully, anyways)
> -- I'm looking at it now.
>
>
> rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
>
>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
>>> -- Lars
>>>
>>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
>>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain<
>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<td...@salesforce.com>;
>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>
>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on cluster.
>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index upgrade
>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
>>> PHOENIX-3002.
>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in transit
>>> for 2 days.
>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How we looking for the RC?
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
>>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
>>>>>>
>>>>> this
>>>>>
>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
>>>>>>
>>>>> something
>>>>>
>>>>>> more.
>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035
>>>>>>
>>>>> in.
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>>>>>>
>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> daily
>>>>>
>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> much
>>>>>
>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
@Ankit, @Mujtaba - where are at now with the release? Would it be possible
to get a list of the handful of remaining JIRAs being targeted for
4.8? Is PHOENIX-3056
a blocker?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
> somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded
> package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully, anyways)
> -- I'm looking at it now.
>
>
> rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
>
>> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
>>> -- Lars
>>>
>>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
>>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
>>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain<
>>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
>>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<td...@salesforce.com>;
>>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>
>>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
>>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on cluster.
>>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index upgrade
>>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
>>> PHOENIX-3002.
>>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in transit
>>> for 2 days.
>>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ankit Singhal
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How we looking for the RC?
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
>>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
>>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
>>>>>>
>>>>> this
>>>>>
>>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
>>>>>>
>>>>> something
>>>>>
>>>>>> more.
>>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035
>>>>>>
>>>>> in.
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>>>>>>
>>>>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> daily
>>>>>
>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
>>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> much
>>>>>
>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
Just an FYI: I re-opened PHOENIX-3025. It seems like this broke PQS
somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded
package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully,
anyways) -- I'm looking at it now.
rajeshbabu@apache.org wrote:
> I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
>> -- Lars
>>
>> From: Ankit Singhal<an...@gmail.com>
>> To: James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
>> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org"<de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain<
>> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla<
>> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva<td...@salesforce.com>;
>> Mujtaba Chohan<mc...@salesforce.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>
>> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
>> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on cluster.
>> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index upgrade
>> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
>> PHOENIX-3002.
>> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in transit
>> for 2 days.
>> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ankit Singhal
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor<ja...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> How we looking for the RC?
>>>
>>> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
>>>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
>>>>
>>>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM,<la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>>>>> -- Lars
>>>>> From: Samarth Jain<sa...@apache.org>
>>>>> To: dev<de...@phoenix.apache.org>
>>>>> Cc: Ankit Singhal<an...@apache.org>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>>>>>
>>>>> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
>>>> this
>>>>> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
>>>> something
>>>>> more.
>>>>> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035
>> in.
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor<
>> jamestaylor@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
>>>> daily
>>>>>> so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
>>>>>> outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
>>>> much
>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by "rajeshbabu@apache.org" <ch...@gmail.com>.
I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
> -- Lars
>
> From: Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
> To: James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain <
> samarth.jain@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla <
> rchintaguntla@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com>;
> Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>
> Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
> comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on cluster.
> And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index upgrade
> for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
> PHOENIX-3002.
> We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in transit
> for 2 days.
> I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
>
> Regards,
> Ankit Singhal
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > How we looking for the RC?
> >
> > On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
> >> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> >>
> >> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> >> > -- Lars
> >> > From: Samarth Jain <sa...@apache.org>
> >> > To: dev <de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> >> > Cc: Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org>
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >> >
> >> > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
> >> this
> >> > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> >> something
> >> > more.
> >> > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035
> in.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <
> jamestaylor@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> >> daily
> >> > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> >> > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
> >> much
> >> > > appreciated.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > James
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by la...@apache.org.
I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it.
-- Lars
From: Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>
To: James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
Cc: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <de...@phoenix.apache.org>; Samarth Jain <sa...@salesforce.com>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla <rc...@hortonworks.com>; Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com>; Mujtaba Chohan <mc...@salesforce.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on cluster.
And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index upgrade
for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
PHOENIX-3002.
We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in transit
for 2 days.
I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> How we looking for the RC?
>
> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
>>
>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>> > -- Lars
>> > From: Samarth Jain <sa...@apache.org>
>> > To: dev <de...@phoenix.apache.org>
>> > Cc: Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>> > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> >
>> > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
>> this
>> > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
>> something
>> > more.
>> > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
>> daily
>> > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
>> > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
>> much
>> > > appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > James
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
Both the two Jiras(PHOENIX-2902, PHOENIX-2999) are ready with review
comments but need to test the upgrade(and drop with cascade) on cluster.
And , Waiting for commit of PHOENIX-2926 and fix for local index upgrade
for multi-tenant table which is not working with latest patch on
PHOENIX-3002.
We will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in transit
for 2 days.
I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> How we looking for the RC?
>
> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
>> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
>>
>> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
>> > -- Lars
>> > From: Samarth Jain <sa...@apache.org>
>> > To: dev <de...@phoenix.apache.org>
>> > Cc: Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
>> > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>> >
>> > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
>> this
>> > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
>> something
>> > more.
>> > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
>> daily
>> > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
>> > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
>> much
>> > > appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > James
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
How we looking for the RC?
On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
> think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
>
> The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <larsh@apache.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > -- Lars
> > From: Samarth Jain <samarth@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > To: dev <dev@phoenix.apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > Cc: Ankit Singhal <ankit@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> >
> > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
> this
> > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or something
> > more.
> > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> daily
> > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
> much
> > > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: where are we at with the RC?
Posted by Samarth Jain <sa...@gmail.com>.
PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> -- Lars
> From: Samarth Jain <sa...@apache.org>
> To: dev <de...@phoenix.apache.org>
> Cc: Ankit Singhal <an...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>
> PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on this
> today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or something
> more.
> If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this daily
> > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be much
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
>
>
>
>