You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Sergio <sh...@ipsoluciones.com> on 2002/11/14 19:45:05 UTC

BASIC-LINK

Hí again....

I'm going crazy with this kind of problems...

I'm rendering a pdf file of 22 pages.
at the first of the file, I have the following basic links:

<fo:block hyphenate='false' text-align='justify' text-align-last='start' line-height='12pt' font-size='9pt' space-before.optimum='1.5pt' space-after.optimum='1.5pt' keep-together='always' color='gray'>
<fo:inline white-space-collapse='false'>tarariiislkjalskjdflksjdflkasjdlfkasjdlfkasjldfkjasldfjl <fo:basic-link color='#0000ff' text-decoration='underline' internal-destination='subprin3B'>3B</fo:basic-link> ,<fo:basic-link color='#0000ff' text-decoration='underline' internal-destination='subprin3D'>3D</fo:basic-link> ,<fo:basic-link color='#0000ff' text-decoration='underline' internal-destination='subprin6D'>6D</fo:basic-link> ,<fo:basic-link color='#0000ff' text-decoration='underline' internal-destination='subprin6H'>6H</fo:basic-link>.
</fo:inline>
</fo:block>
-------------------------

after of this, the rest o the fo file, with some blocks
<fo:block id='subprin3A' t...
.... page n....
<fo:block id='subprin3B' t...
.... page k ...
<fo:block id='subprin3D' t...

Well, the problem is with the basic link named: subprin3D.

When fop render the fo file, the only message i get is:
[INFO] [11]
[INFO] [12]
[INFO] [13]

---------

and the render crashes...
If I make different the name of the basic-link or the name of the block id, the pdf is well rendered.


I have anothers .fo files with many more links that are well rendered, but this file no.

Why ?

Thanks at all, Sergio.





Re: BASIC-LINK

Posted by Oleg Tkachenko <ol...@multiconn.com>.
Sergio wrote:

> and the render crashes...
> If I make different the name of the basic-link or the name of the block 
> id, the pdf is well rendered.
>  
>  
> I have anothers .fo files with many more links that are well rendered, 
> but this file no.
>  
> Why ?
Looks too bizarre, open a bug in bugzilla and attach full fo document 
illustrating the problem.

-- 
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org