[users@httpd] Documentation for TypesConfig

[Peter Michaux <pe...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

The documentation for TypesConfig directive says that the filename is
relative to ServerRoot.

<URL: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_mime.html#typesconfig>

I am using an absolute path for the filename parameter and it seems to
work fine. Should the docs be changed to include this possibility?

Thanks,
Peter
-- 
Fork JavaScript: http://forkjavascript.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Documentation for TypesConfig

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Peter Michaux wrote:
> 
> The documentation for TypesConfig directive says that the filename is
> relative to ServerRoot.
> 
> I am using an absolute path for the filename parameter and it seems to
> work fine.

So it should.

> Should the docs be changed to include this possibility?

No.  All directives that are serverroot-relative can be absolute.  For
that matter, IIRC, every filename directive supports absolute paths; only
URI-paths can't be 'absolute' in the sense of where they are in the file
system.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org