You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by mrbelvedr <tm...@ktait.com> on 2010/01/17 11:30:16 UTC
Google Commerce Search
Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
recommend but we like to use open source if it is a great alternative to
Google Search Appliance or Google Commerce Search.
Google has recently introduced "Google Commerce Search" which allows
ecommerce merchants to have their products indexed by Google and shoppers
may search for products easily.
Here is the URL of their new offering:
http://www.google.com/commercesearch/#utm_source=en-et-na-us-merchants&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=merchants
Obviously this is a great solution. It offers all the great things like
spell checking, product synonyms, etc. Is Solr able to do these features:
* Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
* Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and the
search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
* We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
handle that many products and give fast search results?
Please advise if Solr will work as well as Google product?
Thx!
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197509.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by Mohamed Parvez <pa...@gmail.com>.
>From the Solr Wiki about Query-time synonym expansion
"...synonyms containing multiple words..The recommended approach for dealing
with synonyms like this, is to expand the synonym when indexing. This is
because there are two potential issues that can arise at query time"
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
So stuck with query time synonym.
---
Thanks/Regards,
Parvez
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com> wrote:
> And what I recommended to my Fortune 1 client....;) ...actually, just one
> correction:
>
>
> > Secondly you should know that, you can not update or push Synonyms at run
> > time.
>
> You can, if you are okay with query-time synonym expansion. The new
> replication can be used to replicate not only indices, but also config
> files, including the synonyms file. My guess is that this is the same with
> GSA and other search vendors' solutions.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Mohamed Parvez <pa...@gmail.com>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Sun, January 17, 2010 1:35:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: Google Commerce Search
> >
> > I was in your same shoes as yours. And did recommend and implement Solr
> to
> > my Fortune 10 client. Solr is a great solution and does meet most of the
> > requirements and lacks very few things.
> >
> > In your case, I think you should know that Solr does handle Synonyms very
> > well as long as they are single word to single word mappings.
> > Even cases with many to one and one to many mappings. But when it comes
> to
> > multi word to multi word mappings, it still works, but you need to do
> > some twining.
> >
> > Secondly you should know that, you can not update or push Synonyms at run
> > time.
> >
> > Never less Solr just works out of the box in windows and Linux and I have
> > tried it with various servers like, Tomcat, Jetty, Weblogic etc. It works
> > like a chap and I have had 100% Uptime, since we went to production.
> >
> > -----
> > Thanks/Regards,
> > Parvez
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:30 AM, mrbelvedr wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
> > > vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
> > > recommend but we like to use open source if it is a great alternative
> to
> > > Google Search Appliance or Google Commerce Search.
> > >
> > > Google has recently introduced "Google Commerce Search" which allows
> > > ecommerce merchants to have their products indexed by Google and
> shoppers
> > > may search for products easily.
> > >
> > > Here is the URL of their new offering:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.google.com/commercesearch/#utm_source=en-et-na-us-merchants&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=merchants
> > >
> > > Obviously this is a great solution. It offers all the great things like
> > > spell checking, product synonyms, etc. Is Solr able to do these
> features:
> > >
> > > * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
> > >
> > > * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and
> the
> > > search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
> > >
> > > * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will
> Solr
> > > handle that many products and give fast search results?
> > >
> > > Please advise if Solr will work as well as Google product?
> > >
> > > Thx!
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > > http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197509.html
> > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
>
>
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
And what I recommended to my Fortune 1 client....;) ...actually, just one correction:
> Secondly you should know that, you can not update or push Synonyms at run
> time.
You can, if you are okay with query-time synonym expansion. The new
replication can be used to replicate not only indices, but also config
files, including the synonyms file. My guess is that this is the same with GSA and other search vendors' solutions.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
----- Original Message ----
> From: Mohamed Parvez <pa...@gmail.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, January 17, 2010 1:35:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Google Commerce Search
>
> I was in your same shoes as yours. And did recommend and implement Solr to
> my Fortune 10 client. Solr is a great solution and does meet most of the
> requirements and lacks very few things.
>
> In your case, I think you should know that Solr does handle Synonyms very
> well as long as they are single word to single word mappings.
> Even cases with many to one and one to many mappings. But when it comes to
> multi word to multi word mappings, it still works, but you need to do
> some twining.
>
> Secondly you should know that, you can not update or push Synonyms at run
> time.
>
> Never less Solr just works out of the box in windows and Linux and I have
> tried it with various servers like, Tomcat, Jetty, Weblogic etc. It works
> like a chap and I have had 100% Uptime, since we went to production.
>
> -----
> Thanks/Regards,
> Parvez
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:30 AM, mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> >
> > Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
> > vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
> > recommend but we like to use open source if it is a great alternative to
> > Google Search Appliance or Google Commerce Search.
> >
> > Google has recently introduced "Google Commerce Search" which allows
> > ecommerce merchants to have their products indexed by Google and shoppers
> > may search for products easily.
> >
> > Here is the URL of their new offering:
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.google.com/commercesearch/#utm_source=en-et-na-us-merchants&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=merchants
> >
> > Obviously this is a great solution. It offers all the great things like
> > spell checking, product synonyms, etc. Is Solr able to do these features:
> >
> > * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
> >
> > * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and the
> > search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
> >
> > * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
> > handle that many products and give fast search results?
> >
> > Please advise if Solr will work as well as Google product?
> >
> > Thx!
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197509.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by Mohamed Parvez <pa...@gmail.com>.
I was in your same shoes as yours. And did recommend and implement Solr to
my Fortune 10 client. Solr is a great solution and does meet most of the
requirements and lacks very few things.
In your case, I think you should know that Solr does handle Synonyms very
well as long as they are single word to single word mappings.
Even cases with many to one and one to many mappings. But when it comes to
multi word to multi word mappings, it still works, but you need to do
some twining.
Secondly you should know that, you can not update or push Synonyms at run
time.
Never less Solr just works out of the box in windows and Linux and I have
tried it with various servers like, Tomcat, Jetty, Weblogic etc. It works
like a chap and I have had 100% Uptime, since we went to production.
-----
Thanks/Regards,
Parvez
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:30 AM, mrbelvedr <tm...@ktait.com> wrote:
>
> Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
> vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
> recommend but we like to use open source if it is a great alternative to
> Google Search Appliance or Google Commerce Search.
>
> Google has recently introduced "Google Commerce Search" which allows
> ecommerce merchants to have their products indexed by Google and shoppers
> may search for products easily.
>
> Here is the URL of their new offering:
>
>
> http://www.google.com/commercesearch/#utm_source=en-et-na-us-merchants&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=merchants
>
> Obviously this is a great solution. It offers all the great things like
> spell checking, product synonyms, etc. Is Solr able to do these features:
>
> * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
>
> * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and the
> search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
>
> * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
> handle that many products and give fast search results?
>
> Please advise if Solr will work as well as Google product?
>
> Thx!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197509.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by Lukáš Vlček <lu...@gmail.com>.
BTW: If you are looking for somebody to help you with Solr then you can
check the following wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Support
Rgds,
Lukas
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Pradeep Pujari <pr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Yes, all the points you mentioned can be easily done in Solr.
>
> Pradeep
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, mrbelvedr <tm...@ktait.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
> > vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
> > recommend but we like to use open source if it is a great alternative to
> > Google Search Appliance or Google Commerce Search.
> >
> > Google has recently introduced "Google Commerce Search" which allows
> > ecommerce merchants to have their products indexed by Google and shoppers
> > may search for products easily.
> >
> > Here is the URL of their new offering:
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.google.com/commercesearch/#utm_source=en-et-na-us-merchants&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=merchants
> >
> > Obviously this is a great solution. It offers all the great things like
> > spell checking, product synonyms, etc. Is Solr able to do these
> features:
> >
> > * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
> >
> > * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and
> the
> > search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
> >
> > * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
> > handle that many products and give fast search results?
> >
> > Please advise if Solr will work as well as Google product?
> >
> > Thx!
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197509.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by Pradeep Pujari <pr...@gmail.com>.
Yes, all the points you mentioned can be easily done in Solr.
Pradeep
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, mrbelvedr <tm...@ktait.com> wrote:
>
> Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
> vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
> recommend but we like to use open source if it is a great alternative to
> Google Search Appliance or Google Commerce Search.
>
> Google has recently introduced "Google Commerce Search" which allows
> ecommerce merchants to have their products indexed by Google and shoppers
> may search for products easily.
>
> Here is the URL of their new offering:
>
>
> http://www.google.com/commercesearch/#utm_source=en-et-na-us-merchants&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=merchants
>
> Obviously this is a great solution. It offers all the great things like
> spell checking, product synonyms, etc. Is Solr able to do these features:
>
> * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
>
> * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and the
> search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
>
> * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
> handle that many products and give fast search results?
>
> Please advise if Solr will work as well as Google product?
>
> Thx!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197509.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by MitchK <mi...@web.de>.
Bill,
are you comparing percentage-rates or total numbers?
Keep in mind that Google own a big part of the traffic-cake.
Kind regards
Mitch
William Pierce-3 wrote:
>
> Let me give you an example from my own personal experience. We submit
> data feed of products from my clients to various shopping engines:
> Froogle
> (from Google), shopping.com, Yahoo Shopping, etc etc. Each week we get
> sales reports. The differences between google and others is breathtaking:
> where the others generate may be a few hundred dollars in sales, Froogle
> consistently outperforms them by a FACTOR (yes, that's right) of 10 or
> more.
> And neither shopping.com (owned by ebay) nor Yahoo are engineering
> slouches
> by any means!
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27201679.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by mrbelvedr <tm...@ktait.com>.
Thanks for your frank analysis.
William Pierce-3 wrote:
>
> I have used solr extensively for our sites (and for the clients I work
> with). I think it is great! If you do an item-by-item feature list
> comparison, I think you will find that solr stacks up quite well. And
> the
> price, of course, cannot be beat!
>
> However, there are a few intangibles that make me recommend (somewhat
> heretically) the google solution:
>
> First: No one got fired for recommending Google :-)
>
> Second and more important: In my experience getting search done is about
> 95% tuning and tweaking and semantic understanding. Only 5% or so is the
> actual part of getting your intended feature list working. (The exact
> numbers may vary and you may debate it but search is largely a semantic
> problem, and those who excel at semantic analysis and can map that to the
> problem domain quickly and efficiently will win.) I think Google excels
> at
> these intangibles in ways that no one has been able to match.
>
> Let me give you an example from my own personal experience. We submit
> data feed of products from my clients to various shopping engines:
> Froogle
> (from Google), shopping.com, Yahoo Shopping, etc etc. Each week we get
> sales reports. The differences between google and others is breathtaking:
> where the others generate may be a few hundred dollars in sales, Froogle
> consistently outperforms them by a FACTOR (yes, that's right) of 10 or
> more.
> And neither shopping.com (owned by ebay) nor Yahoo are engineering
> slouches
> by any means!
>
> The downsides of Google: a) too much of your client's data is at google
> (adwords, product feeds, and now search patterns of their visitors). b)
> cost.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Bill
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "mrbelvedr" <tm...@ktait.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:30 AM
> To: <so...@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Google Commerce Search
>
>>
>> Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
>> vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
>> recommend but we like to use open source if it is a great alternative to
>> Google Search Appliance or Google Commerce Search.
>>
>> Google has recently introduced "Google Commerce Search" which allows
>> ecommerce merchants to have their products indexed by Google and shoppers
>> may search for products easily.
>>
>> Here is the URL of their new offering:
>>
>> http://www.google.com/commercesearch/#utm_source=en-et-na-us-merchants&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=merchants
>>
>> Obviously this is a great solution. It offers all the great things like
>> spell checking, product synonyms, etc. Is Solr able to do these
>> features:
>>
>> * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
>>
>> * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and
>> the
>> search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
>>
>> * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
>> handle that many products and give fast search results?
>>
>> Please advise if Solr will work as well as Google product?
>>
>> Thx!
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197509.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27204236.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by William Pierce <ev...@hotmail.com>.
I have used solr extensively for our sites (and for the clients I work
with). I think it is great! If you do an item-by-item feature list
comparison, I think you will find that solr stacks up quite well. And the
price, of course, cannot be beat!
However, there are a few intangibles that make me recommend (somewhat
heretically) the google solution:
First: No one got fired for recommending Google :-)
Second and more important: In my experience getting search done is about
95% tuning and tweaking and semantic understanding. Only 5% or so is the
actual part of getting your intended feature list working. (The exact
numbers may vary and you may debate it but search is largely a semantic
problem, and those who excel at semantic analysis and can map that to the
problem domain quickly and efficiently will win.) I think Google excels at
these intangibles in ways that no one has been able to match.
Let me give you an example from my own personal experience. We submit
data feed of products from my clients to various shopping engines: Froogle
(from Google), shopping.com, Yahoo Shopping, etc etc. Each week we get
sales reports. The differences between google and others is breathtaking:
where the others generate may be a few hundred dollars in sales, Froogle
consistently outperforms them by a FACTOR (yes, that's right) of 10 or more.
And neither shopping.com (owned by ebay) nor Yahoo are engineering slouches
by any means!
The downsides of Google: a) too much of your client's data is at google
(adwords, product feeds, and now search patterns of their visitors). b)
cost.
Cheers,
- Bill
--------------------------------------------------
From: "mrbelvedr" <tm...@ktait.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:30 AM
To: <so...@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: Google Commerce Search
>
> Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
> vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
> recommend but we like to use open source if it is a great alternative to
> Google Search Appliance or Google Commerce Search.
>
> Google has recently introduced "Google Commerce Search" which allows
> ecommerce merchants to have their products indexed by Google and shoppers
> may search for products easily.
>
> Here is the URL of their new offering:
>
> http://www.google.com/commercesearch/#utm_source=en-et-na-us-merchants&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=merchants
>
> Obviously this is a great solution. It offers all the great things like
> spell checking, product synonyms, etc. Is Solr able to do these features:
>
> * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
>
> * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and
> the
> search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
>
> * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
> handle that many products and give fast search results?
>
> Please advise if Solr will work as well as Google product?
>
> Thx!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197509.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by MitchK <mi...@web.de>.
As you know, Solr is fully written in Java and Java is still
plattform-independent. ;)
Learn more about Solr on http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> That sounds great. Could it also run on Windows? I am interested in
> hiring an experienced Solr freelancer to help us set up Solr on Windows
> and configure it to index our products. If anybody is interested please
> email tmiller@ktait.com
>
> Thank you!
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27198567.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by Lance Norskog <go...@gmail.com>.
The Linux file systems are generally at least twice as fast as the
Windows NTFS file system. Solr installations are mostly disk-limited
so this will have a major effect.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:53 PM, wojtekpia <wo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> While Solr is functionally platform independent, I have seen much better
> performance on Linux than Windows under high load (related to SOLR-465).
>
>
> MitchK wrote:
>>
>> As you know, Solr is fully written in Java and Java is still
>> plattform-independent. ;)
>> Learn more about Solr on http://www.lucene.apache.org/solr
>>
>>
>> mrbelvedr wrote:
>>>
>>> That sounds great. Could it also run on Windows? I am interested in
>>> hiring an experienced Solr freelancer to help us set up Solr on Windows
>>> and configure it to index our products. If anybody is interested please
>>> email tmiller@ktait.com
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27232545.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by wojtekpia <wo...@hotmail.com>.
While Solr is functionally platform independent, I have seen much better
performance on Linux than Windows under high load (related to SOLR-465).
MitchK wrote:
>
> As you know, Solr is fully written in Java and Java is still
> plattform-independent. ;)
> Learn more about Solr on http://www.lucene.apache.org/solr
>
>
> mrbelvedr wrote:
>>
>> That sounds great. Could it also run on Windows? I am interested in
>> hiring an experienced Solr freelancer to help us set up Solr on Windows
>> and configure it to index our products. If anybody is interested please
>> email tmiller@ktait.com
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27232545.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by MitchK <mi...@web.de>.
As you know, Solr is fully written in Java and Java is still
plattform-independent. ;)
Learn more about Solr on http://www.lucene.apache.org/solr
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> That sounds great. Could it also run on Windows? I am interested in
> hiring an experienced Solr freelancer to help us set up Solr on Windows
> and configure it to index our products. If anybody is interested please
> email tmiller@ktait.com
>
> Thank you!
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27198556.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by mrbelvedr <tm...@ktait.com>.
That sounds great. Could it also run on Windows? I am interested in hiring
an experienced Solr freelancer to help us set up Solr on Windows and
configure it to index our products. If anybody is interested please email
tmiller@ktait.com
Thank you!
MitchK wrote:
>
>
> mrbelvedr wrote:
>>
>> * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
>>
> Yes. Have a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerFaq
>
>
> mrbelvedr wrote:
>>
>> * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and
>> the search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
>>
> Yes. If you like, Solr returns no "Did you mean" but includes every
> "Sharpie" result in the response. You can influcence the relevancy of
> stemmed and exact results.
>
>
> mrbelvedr wrote:
>>
>> * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
>> handle that many products and give fast search results?
>>
> Solr was built to handle large data volumes.
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27198393.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Google Commerce Search
Posted by MitchK <mi...@web.de>.
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
>
Yes. Have a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerFaq
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and
> the search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
>
Yes. If you like, Solr returns no "Did you mean" but includes every
"Sharpie" result in the response. You can influcence the relevancy of
stemmed results and exact results.
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> * We have 2 million products stored in our MS Sql Server 2008, will Solr
> handle that many products and give fast search results?
>
Solr was built to handle large data volumes.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Google-Commerce-Search-tp27197509p27197801.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.