You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "Marcell Ortutay (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/09/13 01:08:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-4902) Snappy compression benefit is lost when generate hash cache RPC

Marcell Ortutay created PHOENIX-4902:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Snappy compression benefit is lost when generate hash cache RPC
                 Key: PHOENIX-4902
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4902
             Project: Phoenix
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Marcell Ortutay


Phoenix uses snappy compression on hash caches before it sends them to region server:

{code}
                int maxCompressedSize = Snappy.maxCompressedLength(baOut.size());
                byte[] compressed = new byte[maxCompressedSize]; // size for worst case
                int compressedSize = Snappy.compress(baOut.getBuffer(), 0, baOut.size(), compressed, 0);
                // Last realloc to size of compressed buffer.
                ptr.set(compressed,0,compressedSize);
{code}

However, looking at debug output, it seems like the serialized protobuf that it sends to region servers does not have the benefits of snappy compression. Below is an excerpt of some debug output I put in:

{code}
Building an RPC with a cache ptr of size: 39MB  // The compressed size is 39MB
Done serializing the AddServerCacheRequest RPC, size is 206MB  // However the serialized RPC is 206MB
And the cache ptr size is: 206MB  // And specifically, the byte array that contains the serialized hash cache is 206MB
{code}

I've made a simple test codebase to attempt to reproduce this bug. It shows similar behavior:

{code}
bytes size: 10000 bytes
compressed bytes size: 721 bytes
message size: 10003 bytes
compressed message size: 11701 bytes
{code}

The code for the simplified example is here: https://github.com/ortutay/snappy-bytes-buffer/blob/master/src/main/java/testprotobuf/Main.java

I observed this behavior in Phoenix 4.14.1



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)