You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@river.apache.org by "Peter Firmstone (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/09/27 03:37:16 UTC
[jira] Commented: (RIVER-304) Reactivate River jtreg tests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12759973#action_12759973 ]
Peter Firmstone commented on RIVER-304:
---------------------------------------
jtreg test TODO list for AR3 release:
* Debug failed TestParser test.
* Implement Kerberos KDC server at river.zones.apache.org
* Confirm Kerberos Tests pass on JDK1.5
* Find solution to missing jiniproxy
* Find alternative to moving Libraries into jre/lib/ext directory
* Refactor test directory naming scheme in river/trunk/
* Document how to run jtreg tests from the command line and
incorporate into a README.txt file.
* Write Ant script to run jtreg tests.
* Find replacement or replicate required functionality of
sun.net.spi.nameservice API
* kinit - replacement required, prefer platform independent java
implementation, I'm going to ask Apache Harmony, they have this on
their TODO list.
JT Harness : Tests that failed
Tests are grouped by their final status message.
Execution failed: `main' threw exception:
java.rmi.UnknownHostException: unknown host in
BasicObjectEndpoint[1a464871-e4db-467b-b54e-042acf40a044,HttpEndpoint[10.1.1.2:50914]];
nested exception is: java.net.UnknownHostException: jiniproxy
* net/jini/jeri/http/echo/EchoImpl.java
<ci...@zeus.net.au> : Echo implementation
for testing basic HTTP endpoint functionality.
Execution failed: exit code 1
* net/jini/config/ConfigurationFile/TestParser/TestParser.java
<ci...@zeus.net.au> : Tests parsing
configuration files.
* net/jini/jeri/kerberos/RegressionTests/runListenEndpointTest.sh
<ci...@zeus.net.au> : Different
ServerEndPoints must allow export on same ListenEndPoint
* net/jini/jeri/transport/multihomed/runMultihome.sh
<ci...@zeus.net.au> : Test the
KerberosEndpoint for multihome support
Execution failed: exit code 255
* net/jini/jeri/kerberos/UnitTests/runTestEndpoints.sh
<ci...@zeus.net.au> : Test the
KerberosEndpoint and KerberosServerEndpoint classes.
* net/jini/jeri/kerberos/UnitTests/runTestPerformance.sh
<ci...@zeus.net.au> : Tests the end to end
performance of Kerberos provider.
> Reactivate River jtreg tests
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: RIVER-304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-304
> Project: River
> Issue Type: Test
> Environment: JDK 1.5 or later with jtreg test suite http://www.openjdk.org/jtreg/
> Reporter: Peter Firmstone
> Attachments: ant.html, jtreg_stdout_errout.txt, JTreport-jdk1.5-qatests-trunk.tgz, JTreport.tgz, JTwork-jdk5-qatests-trunk.tgz, JTwork.tgz
>
>
> From a recent discussion on river-dev:
> Peter Firmstone wrote:
> > Using the GPLv2 version of jtreg is ok as a platform requirement for the tests, we just can't distribute it with River.
> >
> > Peter Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:27:18PM +0200, Jonathan Costers wrote:
> >>
> >>> Something a bit off-topic: the "jtreg tests" are mentioned in the
> >>> discussion you linked to. How do these differ from the other harness/QA
> >>> tests? I must say I haven't really looked at them deeply, but I did
> >>> notice them and that they are separate from the QA suite ...
> >>> For the moment the source just sits there .. Nothing is even compiled.
> >>> Would you be able to give some pointers?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sure. They are written to be run with "jtreg", the test harness used
> >> for regression & unit tests for Sun's JDK. These days there is a
> >> version of jtreg available under GPLv2 as part of the OpenJDK project,
> >> here:
> >>
> >> http://www.openjdk.org/jtreg/
> >>
> >> The use of this test framework in addition to the primary Jini QA
> >> framework is historical: some of the APIs added to version 2.0 of the
> >> Jini starter kit-- such as JERI and the related security model,
> >> preferred classes, the configuration stuff-- were originally developed
> >> for the JDK, mostly under JSRs 76 & 78, and thus their implementations
> >> initially had tests written for the jtreg framework. When those APIs
> >> and implementations were moved to the Jini starter kit, those jtreg
> >> tests came with them, and some new tests in those areas continued to
> >> be added to this jtreg suite.
> >>
> >> The essential jtreg model is very simple: a test is a tagged class
> >> (source file) with a normal "main" method-- if that method completes
> >> normally, the test passes; if it throws an exception (or times out, or
> >> the JVM crashes...), the test fails. The jtreg goal was to set a very
> >> low barrier to move standalone test cases or example code into the
> >> framework. The framework does specify more options and nuances, but
> >> it's still pretty simple overall:
> >>
> >> http://www.openjdk.org/jtreg/tag-spec.txt
> >>
> >> which is quite nice for some things-- of course it doesn't have
> >> anything like the power of the Jini QA framework for testing of
> >> distributed services, etc. And the Jini jtreg suite has accreted an
> >> unfortunately somewhat ad hoc infrastructure library of its own, in
> >> the "qa/jtreg/testlibrary" directory. Also, I think that it still has
> >> a few assumptions about being run within Sun's internal network, like
> >> that certain services (a KDC?) are provided by certain host names.
> >>
> >> You just see source files because the harness is responsible for
> >> building them at test execution time. The jtreg implementation is
> >> built as a layer on top of the JavaTest framework (a much more complex
> >> test framework used for the JCK among other things), which has the
> >> same build-at-test-execution-time model. (This is nice in that
> >> breaking the compilation of one test doesn't prevent executing other,
> >> unaffected tests-- each test is isolated all the way to its source.)
> >>
> >> I'm not sure how the GPLv2 status of the jtreg implementation
> >> available through the OpenJDK project affects the ability to use it to
> >> run these tests for River. A nice aspect of the jtreg model's
> >> simplicity is that the test classes themselves do not need to link to
> >> or otherwise refer to any test framework APIs-- there are no such
> >> APIs. (In theory each of these tests can be run as is, with the right
> >> class paths and javac & java commands.) At one time the engineering
> >> lead for the Jini QA harness had prototyped adding support for
> >> jtreg-style tests to the Jini harness, and I think that he had gotten
> >> it more or less working, but that effort was dropped for reasons I
> >> can't recall-- although I would guess that it didn't seem like a
> >> priority at the time because jtreg itself was available internally.
> >>
> >> -- Peter
> >>
> >>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.