You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Kristian Waagan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/04/04 16:13:24 UTC

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-3596) Creation of logical connections from a pooled connection causes resource leak on the server

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Kristian Waagan updated DERBY-3596:
-----------------------------------

    Affects Version/s: 10.5.0.0
                       10.4.1.0
        Fix Version/s:     (was: 10.5.0.0)
                           (was: 10.4.0.0)

Corrected messed up affects and fix version...

> Creation of logical connections from a pooled connection causes resource leak on the server
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3596
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3596
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Client, Network Server, Performance
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.2.1, 10.4.1.0, 10.5.0.0
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>
> When using ClientConnectionPoolDataSource and connection pooling, a new connection / transaction is created for every new logical connection, and the resources are not freed / cleaned up in the server. They are not even cleaned up when the physical connection (ClientPooledConnection) is closed.
> A logical connection is obtained by invoking ClientPooledConnection.getConnection().
> I have observed that if you run the repro enough times against the same server, the number of transaction in the transaction table will be reduced now and then. I believe this is garbage collection, but I have not investigated the problem enough to tell for sure what's going on.
> I have also seen some locks not being freed, causing timeouts in some applications. I don't have a repro for the lock problem at this time, but it is very likely related to this issue.
> Note that XA connections are handled differently on the server, and do probably not have this problem.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.