You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwhisk.apache.org by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org> on 2017/03/07 09:57:48 UTC
white-listing @apache.org for slack
Hi,
try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org addresses
are not white-listed there:
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
Can any admin add it?
Thanks!
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
Matt I can whitelist any other domain that we want
- Carlos Santana
@csantanapr
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Matt Rutkowski <mr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> This came up early on when I saw that another project had white listed
> domains. However, it appears that this is only available for "enterprise
> accounts according to Slack:
>
> https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/115001379947-Domain-whitelisting
>
> Carlos as the admin. for the current Slack Team should be able to confirm
> if he has the admin power to do this or not.
>
>
> Here is a copy of text from an early email I sent to one or more mentors,
> but do not recall the response other than my takeaway that "the community
> can decide on how to use/leverage for social mediums/channels as long as
> we defer to Apache email lists for serious topic discussions":
>
> -----
>
> Many of our developers are reliant upon Slack communications, in the open
> this is primarily under the dwOpen Team (especially for API Gateway work).
>
> As we want to try to move over existing message-based team communication
> to the Apache community, we wish to preserve Slack as a mainstream
> utility. How do we do this?
>
> I see that there is a precedent for the Mesos project to have a Slack
> domain:
> http://mesos.apache.org/community/
>
> specifically: https://mesos.slack.com/
>
> This site leverages existing User IDs from @apache.org, @ibm.com, etc. The
>
> text in the login screen includes the following:
>
> "If you have an @apache.org, @ibm.com, @cn.ibm.com, @us.ibm.com,
> @apple.com, @mesosphere.com, @mesosphere.io, @microsoft.com, @uber.com,
> @nvidia.com, @projectcalico.org, @metaswitch.com, @emc.com or
> @mojotech.com email address, you can create an account."
>
> How do we go about setting something up like this for OpenWhisk with these
>
> additional domain-based account requirements?
>
> ------
>
> So again, if we need an Enterprise account, how do we obtain (pay for) one
> according to Apache?
>
> Kind regards,
> Matt Rutkowski
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date: 03/08/2017 10:16 AM
> Subject: Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
>
>
>
> Any news on this? Who administers the Slack?
>
> If the process is not that quick, then maybe we should follows Felix's
> idea
> of opening up the registration to everybody ;-)
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I would say it's fine to have some domains whitelisted,
>> particular @apache,org ;-)
>>
>> But them at least we may add some instruction at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Ope
>> nWhisk+project+Slack+channels how to get invited from other domains.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ?
>>>
>>> Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
>>>
>>>> Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org
>>> addresses
>>>> are not white-listed there:
>>>>
>>>> https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
>>>>
>>>> Can any admin add it?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sergio Fernández
>>>> Partner Technology Manager
>>>> Redlink GmbH
>>>> m: +43 6602747925
>>>> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>>>> w: http://redlink.co
>>>
>>> --
>>> <http://redlink.co>
>>> <http://redlink.co>
>>> Sergio Fernández
>>> Partner Technology Manager
>>> Redlink GmbH
>>> m: +43 6602747925
>>> e: <http://redlink.co>sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>>> w: http://redlink.co
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
>
>
>
Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
I'm already in, Thanks, Carlos.
For the moment having @apache.org as allowed domain it's enough. We'll
see...
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for not replying earlier.
>
> OpenWhisk Slack is open to any one you can get an invite here:
> http://slack.openwhisk.org/
>
> From our website we tell people to go there to get an invite.
>
> Fun fact, the web app is implemented using Serverless OpenWhisk.
>
> I sent an invite to Sergio and added the apache.org domain so no need to
> ask for an invite if you are using apache.org email.
> If you have an apache.org email just login https://openwhisk-team.slack.
> com
>
> --Carlos
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:21 PM Matt Rutkowski <mr...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This came up early on when I saw that another project had white listed
> > domains. However, it appears that this is only available for "enterprise
> > accounts according to Slack:
> >
> > https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/115001379947-
> Domain-whitelisting
> >
> > Carlos as the admin. for the current Slack Team should be able to confirm
> > if he has the admin power to do this or not.
> >
> >
> > Here is a copy of text from an early email I sent to one or more mentors,
> > but do not recall the response other than my takeaway that "the community
> > can decide on how to use/leverage for social mediums/channels as long as
> > we defer to Apache email lists for serious topic discussions":
> >
> > -----
> >
> > Many of our developers are reliant upon Slack communications, in the open
> > this is primarily under the dwOpen Team (especially for API Gateway
> work).
> >
> > As we want to try to move over existing message-based team communication
> > to the Apache community, we wish to preserve Slack as a mainstream
> > utility. How do we do this?
> >
> > I see that there is a precedent for the Mesos project to have a Slack
> > domain:
> > http://mesos.apache.org/community/
> >
> > specifically: https://mesos.slack.com/
> >
> > This site leverages existing User IDs from @apache.org, @ibm.com, etc.
> The
> >
> > text in the login screen includes the following:
> >
> > "If you have an @apache.org, @ibm.com, @cn.ibm.com, @us.ibm.com,
> > @apple.com, @mesosphere.com, @mesosphere.io, @microsoft.com, @uber.com,
> > @nvidia.com, @projectcalico.org, @metaswitch.com, @emc.com or
> > @mojotech.com email address, you can create an account."
> >
> > How do we go about setting something up like this for OpenWhisk with
> these
> >
> > additional domain-based account requirements?
> >
> > ------
> >
> > So again, if we need an Enterprise account, how do we obtain (pay for)
> one
> > according to Apache?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Matt Rutkowski
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> > Date: 03/08/2017 10:16 AM
> > Subject: Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
> >
> >
> >
> > Any news on this? Who administers the Slack?
> >
> > If the process is not that quick, then maybe we should follows Felix's
> > idea
> > of opening up the registration to everybody ;-)
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I would say it's fine to have some domains whitelisted,
> > > particular @apache,org ;-)
> > >
> > > But them at least we may add some instruction at
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Ope
> > > nWhisk+project+Slack+channels how to get invited from other domains.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ?
> > >>
> > >> Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Felix
> > >>
> > >> > Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wikier@apache.org
> >:
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org
> > >> addresses
> > >> > are not white-listed there:
> > >> >
> > >> > https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
> > >> >
> > >> > Can any admin add it?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks!
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Sergio Fernández
> > >> > Partner Technology Manager
> > >> > Redlink GmbH
> > >> > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >> > w: http://redlink.co
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> <http://redlink.co>
> > >> <http://redlink.co>
> > >> Sergio Fernández
> > >> Partner Technology Manager
> > >> Redlink GmbH
> > >> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >> e: <http://redlink.co>sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > >> w: http://redlink.co
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
I can give admin access to anyone that wants to help out and moderate and
be vigilante on Slack.
Rodric and me are the only admins right now.
Users as always don't need admin to implement integrations, or use the
Slack API if they want to use it to integrated with OpenWhisk or what ever
system they want.
Just ping us in Slack if you have any suggestions once you join.
--Carlos
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:35 PM Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for not replying earlier.
>
> OpenWhisk Slack is open to any one you can get an invite here:
> http://slack.openwhisk.org/
>
> From our website we tell people to go there to get an invite.
>
> Fun fact, the web app is implemented using Serverless OpenWhisk.
>
> I sent an invite to Sergio and added the apache.org domain so no need to
> ask for an invite if you are using apache.org email.
> If you have an apache.org email just login
> https://openwhisk-team.slack.com
>
> --Carlos
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:21 PM Matt Rutkowski <mr...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> This came up early on when I saw that another project had white listed
> domains. However, it appears that this is only available for "enterprise
> accounts according to Slack:
>
> https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/115001379947-Domain-whitelisting
>
> Carlos as the admin. for the current Slack Team should be able to confirm
> if he has the admin power to do this or not.
>
>
> Here is a copy of text from an early email I sent to one or more mentors,
> but do not recall the response other than my takeaway that "the community
> can decide on how to use/leverage for social mediums/channels as long as
> we defer to Apache email lists for serious topic discussions":
>
> -----
>
> Many of our developers are reliant upon Slack communications, in the open
> this is primarily under the dwOpen Team (especially for API Gateway work).
>
> As we want to try to move over existing message-based team communication
> to the Apache community, we wish to preserve Slack as a mainstream
> utility. How do we do this?
>
> I see that there is a precedent for the Mesos project to have a Slack
> domain:
> http://mesos.apache.org/community/
>
> specifically: https://mesos.slack.com/
>
> This site leverages existing User IDs from @apache.org, @ibm.com, etc. The
>
> text in the login screen includes the following:
>
> "If you have an @apache.org, @ibm.com, @cn.ibm.com, @us.ibm.com,
> @apple.com, @mesosphere.com, @mesosphere.io, @microsoft.com, @uber.com,
> @nvidia.com, @projectcalico.org, @metaswitch.com, @emc.com or
> @mojotech.com email address, you can create an account."
>
> How do we go about setting something up like this for OpenWhisk with these
>
> additional domain-based account requirements?
>
> ------
>
> So again, if we need an Enterprise account, how do we obtain (pay for) one
> according to Apache?
>
> Kind regards,
> Matt Rutkowski
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date: 03/08/2017 10:16 AM
> Subject: Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
>
>
>
> Any news on this? Who administers the Slack?
>
> If the process is not that quick, then maybe we should follows Felix's
> idea
> of opening up the registration to everybody ;-)
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I would say it's fine to have some domains whitelisted,
> > particular @apache,org ;-)
> >
> > But them at least we may add some instruction at
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Ope
> > nWhisk+project+Slack+channels how to get invited from other domains.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ?
> >>
> >> Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >> > Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org
> >> addresses
> >> > are not white-listed there:
> >> >
> >> > https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
> >> >
> >> > Can any admin add it?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sergio Fernández
> >> > Partner Technology Manager
> >> > Redlink GmbH
> >> > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> >> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >> > w: http://redlink.co
> >>
> >> --
> >> <http://redlink.co>
> >> <http://redlink.co>
> >> Sergio Fernández
> >> Partner Technology Manager
> >> Redlink GmbH
> >> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> >> e: <http://redlink.co>sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >> w: http://redlink.co
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
>
>
>
>
Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
Sorry for not replying earlier.
OpenWhisk Slack is open to any one you can get an invite here:
http://slack.openwhisk.org/
From our website we tell people to go there to get an invite.
Fun fact, the web app is implemented using Serverless OpenWhisk.
I sent an invite to Sergio and added the apache.org domain so no need to
ask for an invite if you are using apache.org email.
If you have an apache.org email just login https://openwhisk-team.slack.com
--Carlos
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:21 PM Matt Rutkowski <mr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> This came up early on when I saw that another project had white listed
> domains. However, it appears that this is only available for "enterprise
> accounts according to Slack:
>
> https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/115001379947-Domain-whitelisting
>
> Carlos as the admin. for the current Slack Team should be able to confirm
> if he has the admin power to do this or not.
>
>
> Here is a copy of text from an early email I sent to one or more mentors,
> but do not recall the response other than my takeaway that "the community
> can decide on how to use/leverage for social mediums/channels as long as
> we defer to Apache email lists for serious topic discussions":
>
> -----
>
> Many of our developers are reliant upon Slack communications, in the open
> this is primarily under the dwOpen Team (especially for API Gateway work).
>
> As we want to try to move over existing message-based team communication
> to the Apache community, we wish to preserve Slack as a mainstream
> utility. How do we do this?
>
> I see that there is a precedent for the Mesos project to have a Slack
> domain:
> http://mesos.apache.org/community/
>
> specifically: https://mesos.slack.com/
>
> This site leverages existing User IDs from @apache.org, @ibm.com, etc. The
>
> text in the login screen includes the following:
>
> "If you have an @apache.org, @ibm.com, @cn.ibm.com, @us.ibm.com,
> @apple.com, @mesosphere.com, @mesosphere.io, @microsoft.com, @uber.com,
> @nvidia.com, @projectcalico.org, @metaswitch.com, @emc.com or
> @mojotech.com email address, you can create an account."
>
> How do we go about setting something up like this for OpenWhisk with these
>
> additional domain-based account requirements?
>
> ------
>
> So again, if we need an Enterprise account, how do we obtain (pay for) one
> according to Apache?
>
> Kind regards,
> Matt Rutkowski
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date: 03/08/2017 10:16 AM
> Subject: Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
>
>
>
> Any news on this? Who administers the Slack?
>
> If the process is not that quick, then maybe we should follows Felix's
> idea
> of opening up the registration to everybody ;-)
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I would say it's fine to have some domains whitelisted,
> > particular @apache,org ;-)
> >
> > But them at least we may add some instruction at
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Ope
> > nWhisk+project+Slack+channels how to get invited from other domains.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ?
> >>
> >> Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >> > Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org
> >> addresses
> >> > are not white-listed there:
> >> >
> >> > https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
> >> >
> >> > Can any admin add it?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sergio Fernández
> >> > Partner Technology Manager
> >> > Redlink GmbH
> >> > m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> >> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >> > w: http://redlink.co
> >>
> >> --
> >> <http://redlink.co>
> >> <http://redlink.co>
> >> Sergio Fernández
> >> Partner Technology Manager
> >> Redlink GmbH
> >> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> >> e: <http://redlink.co>sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> >> w: http://redlink.co
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925>
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
>
>
>
>
Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Posted by Matt Rutkowski <mr...@us.ibm.com>.
This came up early on when I saw that another project had white listed
domains. However, it appears that this is only available for "enterprise
accounts according to Slack:
https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/115001379947-Domain-whitelisting
Carlos as the admin. for the current Slack Team should be able to confirm
if he has the admin power to do this or not.
Here is a copy of text from an early email I sent to one or more mentors,
but do not recall the response other than my takeaway that "the community
can decide on how to use/leverage for social mediums/channels as long as
we defer to Apache email lists for serious topic discussions":
-----
Many of our developers are reliant upon Slack communications, in the open
this is primarily under the dwOpen Team (especially for API Gateway work).
As we want to try to move over existing message-based team communication
to the Apache community, we wish to preserve Slack as a mainstream
utility. How do we do this?
I see that there is a precedent for the Mesos project to have a Slack
domain:
http://mesos.apache.org/community/
specifically: https://mesos.slack.com/
This site leverages existing User IDs from @apache.org, @ibm.com, etc. The
text in the login screen includes the following:
"If you have an @apache.org, @ibm.com, @cn.ibm.com, @us.ibm.com,
@apple.com, @mesosphere.com, @mesosphere.io, @microsoft.com, @uber.com,
@nvidia.com, @projectcalico.org, @metaswitch.com, @emc.com or
@mojotech.com email address, you can create an account."
How do we go about setting something up like this for OpenWhisk with these
additional domain-based account requirements?
------
So again, if we need an Enterprise account, how do we obtain (pay for) one
according to Apache?
Kind regards,
Matt Rutkowski
From: Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date: 03/08/2017 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Any news on this? Who administers the Slack?
If the process is not that quick, then maybe we should follows Felix's
idea
of opening up the registration to everybody ;-)
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I would say it's fine to have some domains whitelisted,
> particular @apache,org ;-)
>
> But them at least we may add some instruction at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Ope
> nWhisk+project+Slack+channels how to get invited from other domains.
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ?
>>
>> Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> > Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org
>> addresses
>> > are not white-listed there:
>> >
>> > https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
>> >
>> > Can any admin add it?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sergio Fernández
>> > Partner Technology Manager
>> > Redlink GmbH
>> > m: +43 6602747925
>> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> > w: http://redlink.co
>>
>> --
>> <http://redlink.co>
>> <http://redlink.co>
>> Sergio Fernández
>> Partner Technology Manager
>> Redlink GmbH
>> m: +43 6602747925
>> e: <http://redlink.co>sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> w: http://redlink.co
>>
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
Any news on this? Who administers the Slack?
If the process is not that quick, then maybe we should follows Felix's idea
of opening up the registration to everybody ;-)
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would say it's fine to have some domains whitelisted,
> particular @apache,org ;-)
>
> But them at least we may add some instruction at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/Ope
> nWhisk+project+Slack+channels how to get invited from other domains.
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ?
>>
>> Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> > Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org
>> addresses
>> > are not white-listed there:
>> >
>> > https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
>> >
>> > Can any admin add it?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sergio Fernández
>> > Partner Technology Manager
>> > Redlink GmbH
>> > m: +43 6602747925
>> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> > w: http://redlink.co
>>
>> --
>> <http://redlink.co>
>> <http://redlink.co>
>> Sergio Fernández
>> Partner Technology Manager
>> Redlink GmbH
>> m: +43 6602747925
>> e: <http://redlink.co>sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
>> w: http://redlink.co
>>
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
I would say it's fine to have some domains whitelisted,
particular @apache,org ;-)
But them at least we may add some instruction at https://cwiki.apache.org/
confluence/display/OPENWHISK/OpenWhisk+project+Slack+channels how to get
invited from other domains.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ?
>
> Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> > Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org
> addresses
> > are not white-listed there:
> >
> > https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
> >
> > Can any admin add it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
>
> --
> <http://redlink.co>
> <http://redlink.co>
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: <http://redlink.co>sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
Re: white-listing @apache.org for slack
Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>.
Hi
Should the openwhisk-team slack not just be open to anybody ?
Or do we really need invites for all people unless whitelisted ?
Regards
Felix
> Am 07.03.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>:
>
> Hi,
>
> try to get access to the podling slack, I've realized apache.org addresses
> are not white-listed there:
>
> https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/signup
>
> Can any admin add it?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co