You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@curator.apache.org by "laurentgo (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2024/03/13 15:49:58 UTC

Re: [PR] CURATOR-704. Add server compatibility check support [curator]

laurentgo commented on code in PR #497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/497#discussion_r1523519824


##########
curator-client/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/utils/ZookeeperCompatibility.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.curator.utils;
+
+/**
+ * Describe feature supports based on server compatibility (as opposed to {@code Compatibility}
+ * which represents client compatibility.
+ */
+public interface ZookeeperCompatibility {
+  public enum Version implements ZookeeperCompatibility {
+    VERSION_3_5(false),

Review Comment:
   I'm getting mixed signals here. @eolivelli proposed to remove the constant for ZK 3.5 and let user build the object (and @kezhuw put a thumbs up on this comment), but then @kezhuw is proposing to have user just provide the version and curator do the work, which seems to lean back on my original proposal.
   
   Personally, I'd okay proposing predefined constants but asking the user to provide the full version may be overly complicating things as the only version we currently care about is 3.5 vs 3.6/3.7/3.8 (as permanent watchers seems to be the only feature we are checking for)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@curator.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org