You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> on 2016/02/08 18:37:38 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Dear Flink community,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
0.10.2.
Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of 48
hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of the
previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to vote on
this one.
The commit to be voted on:
e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
Branch:
release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2)
The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 9D403309:
http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
The staging repository for this release can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
-------------------------------------------------------------
The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of at least
three +1 PMC votes are cast.
The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
===================================
The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
* 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release script
(3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Signature file on source looks good
Hash files on source look good
LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
Source compiled
Tests passed
Standalone works
Test on YARN session works
- Henry
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear Flink community,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> 0.10.2.
>
> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of 48
> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of the
> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to vote on
> this one.
>
> The commit to be voted on:
> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
>
> Branch:
> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> )
>
> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 9D403309:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> ===================================
>
> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
>
> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release script
> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Re-ran the tests from the previous RC with the new RC
- Built the code (Linux x64, Scala 2.10, Hadoop 2.3.0)
- Ran all tests
- Checked that there are no cross-version dependencies
- Checked that LICENSE and NOTICE are up to date
- Check planVisualizer util
- ran examples from command line
- tested web frontend on Firefox and Chrome
- ran program on multiple taskmanagers, killed one during execution,
recovery worked properly
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Given the initial feedback, I would like to keep the RC going as well. The
> upcoming 1.0 release will include the fix and if users complain about it
> for 0.10 we can do another release in the future.
>
> —
>
> +1 for this release.
>
> Forwarding my tests from the last vote.
>
> Additionally, I’ve verified that the quickstart poms point to the correct
> version now.
>
> – Ufuk
>
> > On 09 Feb 2016, at 15:59, Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I would also like to keep this RC. 0.10-SNAPSHOT will be equally stable.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I would be in favor of continuing the release candidate.
> >> The change is more a feature improvement than a bug, and these should
> come
> >> before release candidates (otherwise we never get one done).
> >>
> >> The 1.0 release is also very close, so this improvement will be
> available
> >> anyways pretty soon.
> >>
> >> I personally also invested again quite a bit of time into testing this
> >> release candidate already.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Ufuk,
> >>> +1 for a new RC
> >>>
> >>> 2016-02-09 13:49 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey Nick,
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
> >>>> YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
> >>>> release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
> >>>>
> >>>> Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you
> >>>> think?
> >>>>
> >>>> – Ufuk
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this
> >>>> branch
> >>>>> via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
> >>>>> application submissions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Dear Flink community,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> >>> version
> >>>>>> 0.10.2.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of
> >> 48
> >>>>>> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> >>>>>> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of
> >>> the
> >>>>>> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to
> >> vote
> >>>> on
> >>>>>> this one.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The commit to be voted on:
> >>>>>> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Branch:
> >>>>>> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> >>>>>> )
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> >>> 9D403309:
> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> >>>>>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of
> >> at
> >>>> least
> >>>>>> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ===================================
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release
> >> script
> >>>>>> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>.
Given the initial feedback, I would like to keep the RC going as well. The upcoming 1.0 release will include the fix and if users complain about it for 0.10 we can do another release in the future.
—
+1 for this release.
Forwarding my tests from the last vote.
Additionally, I’ve verified that the quickstart poms point to the correct version now.
– Ufuk
> On 09 Feb 2016, at 15:59, Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I would also like to keep this RC. 0.10-SNAPSHOT will be equally stable.
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I would be in favor of continuing the release candidate.
>> The change is more a feature improvement than a bug, and these should come
>> before release candidates (otherwise we never get one done).
>>
>> The 1.0 release is also very close, so this improvement will be available
>> anyways pretty soon.
>>
>> I personally also invested again quite a bit of time into testing this
>> release candidate already.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Ufuk,
>>> +1 for a new RC
>>>
>>> 2016-02-09 13:49 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>>> Hey Nick,
>>>>
>>>> I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
>>>> YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
>>>> release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
>>>>
>>>> Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you
>>>> think?
>>>>
>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this
>>>> branch
>>>>> via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
>>>>> application submissions.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Flink community,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
>>> version
>>>>>> 0.10.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of
>> 48
>>>>>> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
>>>>>> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of
>>> the
>>>>>> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to
>> vote
>>>> on
>>>>>> this one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The commit to be voted on:
>>>>>> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Branch:
>>>>>> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
>>>>>> )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
>>> 9D403309:
>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of
>> at
>>>> least
>>>>>> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release
>> script
>>>>>> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.
I would also like to keep this RC. 0.10-SNAPSHOT will be equally stable.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would be in favor of continuing the release candidate.
> The change is more a feature improvement than a bug, and these should come
> before release candidates (otherwise we never get one done).
>
> The 1.0 release is also very close, so this improvement will be available
> anyways pretty soon.
>
> I personally also invested again quite a bit of time into testing this
> release candidate already.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Ufuk,
> > +1 for a new RC
> >
> > 2016-02-09 13:49 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hey Nick,
> > >
> > > I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
> > > YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
> > > release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
> > >
> > > Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you
> > > think?
> > >
> > > – Ufuk
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this
> > > branch
> > > > via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
> > > > application submissions.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Dear Flink community,
> > > >>
> > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> > version
> > > >> 0.10.2.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of
> 48
> > > >> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> > > >> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of
> > the
> > > >> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to
> vote
> > > on
> > > >> this one.
> > > >>
> > > >> The commit to be voted on:
> > > >> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
> > > >>
> > > >> Branch:
> > > >> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> > > >> )
> > > >>
> > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
> > > >>
> > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > 9D403309:
> > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > >>
> > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
> > > >>
> > > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of
> at
> > > least
> > > >> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >>
> > > >> ===================================
> > > >>
> > > >> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
> > > >>
> > > >> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release
> script
> > > >> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>.
I would be in favor of continuing the release candidate.
The change is more a feature improvement than a bug, and these should come
before release candidates (otherwise we never get one done).
The 1.0 release is also very close, so this improvement will be available
anyways pretty soon.
I personally also invested again quite a bit of time into testing this
release candidate already.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Ufuk,
> +1 for a new RC
>
> 2016-02-09 13:49 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hey Nick,
> >
> > I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
> > YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
> > release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
> >
> > Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you
> > think?
> >
> > – Ufuk
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this
> > branch
> > > via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
> > > application submissions.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear Flink community,
> > >>
> > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> version
> > >> 0.10.2.
> > >>
> > >> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of 48
> > >> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> > >> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of
> the
> > >> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to vote
> > on
> > >> this one.
> > >>
> > >> The commit to be voted on:
> > >> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
> > >>
> > >> Branch:
> > >> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> > >> )
> > >>
> > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
> > >>
> > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> 9D403309:
> > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least
> > >> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >>
> > >> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >>
> > >> ===================================
> > >>
> > >> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
> > >>
> > >> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release script
> > >> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Ufuk,
+1 for a new RC
2016-02-09 13:49 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>:
> Hey Nick,
>
> I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
> YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
> release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
>
> Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you
> think?
>
> – Ufuk
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this
> branch
> > via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
> > application submissions.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Flink community,
> >>
> >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> >> 0.10.2.
> >>
> >> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of 48
> >> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> >> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of the
> >> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to vote
> on
> >> this one.
> >>
> >> The commit to be voted on:
> >> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
> >>
> >> Branch:
> >> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
> >>
> >>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> >> )
> >>
> >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
> >>
> >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 9D403309:
> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >>
> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> >> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>
> >> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>
> >> ===================================
> >>
> >> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
> >>
> >> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release script
> >> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Nick,
Thanks for bringing up the issue. I believe some people (including me) will
try to run Apache Flink on YARN =)
If more 0.10.x releases needed before 1.0 definitely would love to include
this in.
- Henry
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agree it's not a blocker. I can manage my own build with this patch if
> necessary. Just thought I might not be the only one running streaming on
> yarn.
>
> On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ufuk,
> >
> > This is nice to have but not a blocker.
> >
> > So unless we find blocker for the current RC I prefer to continue
> evaluate
> > and VOTE current RC.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Nick,
> > >
> > > I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
> > > YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
> > > release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
> > >
> > > Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you
> > > think?
> > >
> > > – Ufuk
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this
> > > branch
> > > > via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
> > > > application submissions.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Dear Flink community,
> > > >>
> > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> > version
> > > >> 0.10.2.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of
> 48
> > > >> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> > > >> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of
> > the
> > > >> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to
> vote
> > > on
> > > >> this one.
> > > >>
> > > >> The commit to be voted on:
> > > >> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
> > > >>
> > > >> Branch:
> > > >> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> > > >> )
> > > >>
> > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
> > > >>
> > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > 9D403309:
> > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > >>
> > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
> > > >>
> > > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of
> at
> > > least
> > > >> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >>
> > > >> ===================================
> > > >>
> > > >> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
> > > >>
> > > >> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release
> script
> > > >> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>.
Agree it's not a blocker. I can manage my own build with this patch if
necessary. Just thought I might not be the only one running streaming on
yarn.
On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ufuk,
>
> This is nice to have but not a blocker.
>
> So unless we find blocker for the current RC I prefer to continue evaluate
> and VOTE current RC.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Nick,
> >
> > I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
> > YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
> > release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
> >
> > Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you
> > think?
> >
> > – Ufuk
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this
> > branch
> > > via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
> > > application submissions.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear Flink community,
> > >>
> > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
> version
> > >> 0.10.2.
> > >>
> > >> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of 48
> > >> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> > >> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of
> the
> > >> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to vote
> > on
> > >> this one.
> > >>
> > >> The commit to be voted on:
> > >> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
> > >>
> > >> Branch:
> > >> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> > >> )
> > >>
> > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
> > >>
> > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
> 9D403309:
> > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least
> > >> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >>
> > >> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >>
> > >> ===================================
> > >>
> > >> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
> > >>
> > >> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release script
> > >> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ufuk,
This is nice to have but not a blocker.
So unless we find blocker for the current RC I prefer to continue evaluate
and VOTE current RC.
- Henry
On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey Nick,
>
> I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
> YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
> release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
>
> Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you
> think?
>
> – Ufuk
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this
> branch
> > via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
> > application submissions.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Flink community,
> >>
> >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> >> 0.10.2.
> >>
> >> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of 48
> >> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> >> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of the
> >> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to vote
> on
> >> this one.
> >>
> >> The commit to be voted on:
> >> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
> >>
> >> Branch:
> >> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
> >>
> >>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> >> )
> >>
> >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
> >>
> >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 9D403309:
> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> >>
> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> >> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>
> >> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>
> >> ===================================
> >>
> >> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
> >>
> >> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release script
> >> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org>.
Hey Nick,
I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on
YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10
release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix.
Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you think?
– Ufuk
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this branch
> via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
> application submissions.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Flink community,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
>> 0.10.2.
>>
>> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of 48
>> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
>> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of the
>> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to vote on
>> this one.
>>
>> The commit to be voted on:
>> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
>>
>> Branch:
>> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
>>
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
>> )
>>
>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
>>
>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 9D403309:
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>>
>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of at least
>> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>
>> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> ===================================
>>
>> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
>>
>> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release script
>> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>.
Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this branch
via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn
application submissions.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <uc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear Flink community,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
> 0.10.2.
>
> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of 48
> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release
> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of the
> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to vote on
> this one.
>
> The commit to be voted on:
> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709
>
> Branch:
> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see
>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2
> )
>
> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/
>
> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint 9D403309:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> ===================================
>
> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1:
>
> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release script
> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi>
>