You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Simon Pepping <sp...@leverkruid.nl> on 2005/11/09 21:38:32 UTC
Re: svn commit: r332007 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:58:24AM -0000, jeremias@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Wed Nov 9 00:58:20 2005
> New Revision: 332007
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007&view=rev
> Log:
> Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used.
Why is this necessary? Doesn't the parser resolve the prefix and then
hide it from FOP?
Simon
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
Re: svn commit: r332007 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/fotree/testcases/no_namespace_prefix.fo
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
I know it's not strictly necessary. It's just there for regression
testing purposes and as a demonstration that you don't have to use the
fo: prefix. It doesn't hurt, does it?
On 09.11.2005 21:38:32 Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:58:24AM -0000, jeremias@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: jeremias
> > Date: Wed Nov 9 00:58:20 2005
> > New Revision: 332007
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used.
>
> Why is this necessary? Doesn't the parser resolve the prefix and then
> hide it from FOP?
Jeremias Maerki