You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu> on 2023/01/28 17:16:53 UTC
bz 8116
is imho clearly spam ?
Re: bz 8116
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2023-01-28 at 12:16:53 UTC-0500 (Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:16:53 +0100)
> Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> is imho clearly spam ?
>
> Yes, and I expect that when someone with Bugzilla admin rights sees it (a
> subset of the PMC) it will be appropriately trashed.
Poof, gone.
We don't sit watching our MUAs 24/7
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you a mildly tech-literate politico horrified by the level of
ignorance demonstrated by lawmakers gearing up to regulate online
technology they don't even begin to grasp? Cool. Now you have a
tiny glimpse into a day in the life of a gun owner. -- Sean Davis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Today: the 37th anniversary of the loss of STS-51L Challenger
Re: bz 8116
Posted by Bill Cole <sa...@billmail.scconsult.com>.
On 2023-01-28 at 12:16:53 UTC-0500 (Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:16:53 +0100)
Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>
is rumored to have said:
> is imho clearly spam ?
Yes, and I expect that when someone with Bugzilla admin rights sees it
(a subset of the PMC) it will be appropriately trashed.
As you probably understand, having substantial friction in the mechanics
of destroying bug reports is a good thing.
--
Bill Cole
bill@scconsult.com or billcole@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire