Re: cvs commit: apache/src CHANGES Configuration.tmpl mod_autoindex.c mod_dir.c

[Rodent of Unusual Size <co...@decus.org>]

>From the fingers of Dean Gaudet flowed the following:
>
>I'll give an untested +1 on both:
>
>ftp://ftp.apache.org/apache/dist/contrib/patches/1.2/IndexWidth.patch
>ftp://ftp.apache.org/apache/dist/contrib/patches/1.2/SuppressHTMLPreamble.patch
>
>Ken you want to do the honours since one of those is yours? 

    Sure.  I'm not entirely satisfied with the IndexWidth one, anyway.
    I'll generate a patch to fold them both into 1.3-dev.  Or does
    anyone prefer separate patches?

>P.S. I'm pretty sure that IndexWidth.patch supercedes variable-dir.patch. 

    If the latter is what I think it is, then yes, it does - it uses
    directives rather than #defines.

    #ken    :-)}

Re: cvs commit: apache/src CHANGES Configuration.tmpl mod_autoindex.c mod_dir.c

[Dean Gaudet <dg...@arctic.org>]

Ooooh this would be nice!

Oh yeah, another feature I've frequently wanted is the ability to click
one of the table headings and have it resort the table by that type.  Like
fetch href="?sort=date".

Dean

On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Marc Slemko wrote:

> My preference: change the index module so you can give it a
> strftime()/sprintf() type string that specifies what information to
> include and how to format it.  Things could include filename, size in
> different units, atime/ctime/mtime, owner, days since modified, etc.  I
> think that would be cool and more useful than specific directives to
> alter the width of this or that.
> 
> On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> 
> > >From the fingers of Dean Gaudet flowed the following:
> > >
> > >I'll give an untested +1 on both:
> > >
> > >ftp://ftp.apache.org/apache/dist/contrib/patches/1.2/IndexWidth.patch
> > >ftp://ftp.apache.org/apache/dist/contrib/patches/1.2/SuppressHTMLPreamble.patch
> > >
> > >Ken you want to do the honours since one of those is yours? 
> > 
> >     Sure.  I'm not entirely satisfied with the IndexWidth one, anyway.
> >     I'll generate a patch to fold them both into 1.3-dev.  Or does
> >     anyone prefer separate patches?
> > 
> > >P.S. I'm pretty sure that IndexWidth.patch supercedes variable-dir.patch. 
> > 
> >     If the latter is what I think it is, then yes, it does - it uses
> >     directives rather than #defines.
> > 
> >     #ken    :-)}
> > 
> 
> 

Re: cvs commit: apache/src CHANGES Configuration.tmpl mod_autoindex.c mod_dir.c

[Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>]

My preference: change the index module so you can give it a
strftime()/sprintf() type string that specifies what information to
include and how to format it.  Things could include filename, size in
different units, atime/ctime/mtime, owner, days since modified, etc.  I
think that would be cool and more useful than specific directives to
alter the width of this or that.

On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:

> >From the fingers of Dean Gaudet flowed the following:
> >
> >I'll give an untested +1 on both:
> >
> >ftp://ftp.apache.org/apache/dist/contrib/patches/1.2/IndexWidth.patch
> >ftp://ftp.apache.org/apache/dist/contrib/patches/1.2/SuppressHTMLPreamble.patch
> >
> >Ken you want to do the honours since one of those is yours? 
> 
>     Sure.  I'm not entirely satisfied with the IndexWidth one, anyway.
>     I'll generate a patch to fold them both into 1.3-dev.  Or does
>     anyone prefer separate patches?
> 
> >P.S. I'm pretty sure that IndexWidth.patch supercedes variable-dir.patch. 
> 
>     If the latter is what I think it is, then yes, it does - it uses
>     directives rather than #defines.
> 
>     #ken    :-)}
>