You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Mike Matrigali (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> on 2006/03/07 02:15:31 UTC
[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1068) change of store contract: online
compress operations should not share any locks with user transactions
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1068?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali reassigned DERBY-1068:
-------------------------------------
Assign To: Mike Matrigali
> change of store contract: online compress operations should not share any locks with user transactions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1068
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1068
> Project: Derby
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Store
> Reporter: Andreas Korneliussen
> Assignee: Mike Matrigali
> Priority: Minor
>
> Propose to add the following to the store contract:
> * truncate and compress requires exclusive table locking
> * the truncate, purge and compress operations do not share any locks with user transactions
> Currently the store implementation allows users to share locks in truncate and possibly purge.
> This request is driven by:
> http://www.nabble.com/conflict-detection-strategies-t1120376.html#a2938142
> and:
> http://www.nabble.com/RowLocation-contract-from-storage-engine-t1142235.html#a2994156
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira