You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tapestry.apache.org by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/10/24 23:19:34 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TAP5-2400) EventWrapper's "key" and "char" properties are broken

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14183516#comment-14183516 ] 

Howard M. Lewis Ship commented on TAP5-2400:
--------------------------------------------

I'm not sure what the action for this is, I don't understand the issue.  What would you propose as the right way to capture the key or character typed by the user in a cross-framework, cross-browser way?

> EventWrapper's  "key" and "char" properties are broken
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-2400
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2400
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.4
>            Reporter: Felix Scheffer
>
> The EventWrapper copies the properties "key" and "char"  from the native event but KeyboardEvent has neither a "key" nor a "char" property in Chromium.
> According to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/KeyboardEvent "char" is only supported by the IE and "has been dropped from DOM Level 3 Events".
> According to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/KeyboardEvent.key neither Chrome nor Opera nor Webkit supports the "key" property at the moment
> I think "char" should be removed from the EventWrapper and there should be a fallback solution using "keyCode"  when the browser does not support "key"
> There is a proposal for a "code" property but it's still a working draft:
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/KeyboardEvent.code
> I checked with Prototype and jQuery but there are no real differences. jQuery wraps the native event with jQuery.Event but the actual values for these properties are the same. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)