You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-user@db.apache.org by Rice Yeh <ri...@yahoo.com> on 2003/06/15 10:19:55 UTC
Can objConcretClass be anonymous now?
Hi all,
On inheritance mapping to one table, a field
'ojbConcretClass' is need in AB abstract class. Is it
still needed since we can treat this field as
anonymous?
Regards,
Rice
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Re: Can objConcretClass be anonymous now?
Posted by Thomas Mahler <th...@web.de>.
it's noted on my ever growing todo list...
Rice Yeh wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> By modification to have each ejbConcretClass as
> anonymous for class mapped to TABLE_AB and running
> PersistenceBrokerTest, there is one failure with the
> test
> testExtentWithOneConcreteClassWithOjbConcreteClass().
> The expected result of query is 2 but the result
> returned is 0. I am not familiar with OJB and do not
> how to explain it. But any way, I think
> ejbConcretClass should be anonymous to have object
> model not instrumented by ojb.
>
> Regards,
> Rice
>
>
> --- Thomas Mahler <th...@web.de> wrote:
>
>>Good idea!
>>I have not tried it so far. Just give it a try and
>>tell us about the
>>results!
>>
>>cheers,
>>Thomas
>>
>>Rice Yeh wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>> On inheritance mapping to one table, a field
>>>'ojbConcretClass' is need in AB abstract class. Is
>>
>>it
>>
>>>still needed since we can treat this field as
>>>anonymous?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Rice
>>>
>>>__________________________________
>>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>>SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>>>http://sbc.yahoo.com
>>>
>>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>
>>ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>
>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>>
>>ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>>
>>>
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>>ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>
>
Re: Can objConcretClass be anonymous now?
Posted by Rice Yeh <ri...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Thomas,
By modification to have each ejbConcretClass as
anonymous for class mapped to TABLE_AB and running
PersistenceBrokerTest, there is one failure with the
test
testExtentWithOneConcreteClassWithOjbConcreteClass().
The expected result of query is 2 but the result
returned is 0. I am not familiar with OJB and do not
how to explain it. But any way, I think
ejbConcretClass should be anonymous to have object
model not instrumented by ojb.
Regards,
Rice
--- Thomas Mahler <th...@web.de> wrote:
> Good idea!
> I have not tried it so far. Just give it a try and
> tell us about the
> results!
>
> cheers,
> Thomas
>
> Rice Yeh wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > On inheritance mapping to one table, a field
> > 'ojbConcretClass' is need in AB abstract class. Is
> it
> > still needed since we can treat this field as
> > anonymous?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rice
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Re: Can objConcretClass be anonymous now?
Posted by Thomas Mahler <th...@web.de>.
Good idea!
I have not tried it so far. Just give it a try and tell us about the
results!
cheers,
Thomas
Rice Yeh wrote:
> Hi all,
> On inheritance mapping to one table, a field
> 'ojbConcretClass' is need in AB abstract class. Is it
> still needed since we can treat this field as
> anonymous?
>
> Regards,
> Rice
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>
>