You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/09/14 11:16:21 UTC

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1900) move Solr to flex APIs

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12909160#action_12909160 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-1900:
------------------------------------------

I think it makes sense to move append to BytesRef, though I wonder if it should it over-allocate (ArrayUtil.oversize) when it grows?  I realize for the current calls to append we don't need that (you just append bigTerm, once), but if someone uses this like a StringBuffer... though, this isn't really the intention of BytesRef, so maybe it's OK to not oversize.

> move Solr to flex APIs
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1900
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-1900-facet_enum.patch, SOLR-1900-facet_enum.patch, SOLR-1900_bigTerm.txt, SOLR-1900_FileFloatSource.patch, SOLR-1900_termsComponent.txt
>
>
> Solr should use flex APIs

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org