You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> on 2011/12/02 16:29:12 UTC
[DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Hi
On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the commands.
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
eg
camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
The number of characters per command is the same.
Using tab can save you from typing most characters in both styles.
So I think the focus on resources really makes the difference and I
think it is more natural to think in resources for humans than in commands.
Christian
Am 08.12.2011 10:38, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
> Hi,
>
> I prefer that we keep as command family name a short name. "camel" is
> fine but "camel-route" or "camel-context" are too long. Imagine when
> operating a project on a platform, the number of characters to be
> typed on the keyboard. This has an impact which is not negligible.
>
> So why not using camel:lisr-routes, camel:list-contexts and their
> shortcut clr, clc
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles
>
>
> On 08/12/11 09:49, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>
>> I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call
>> list or start or stop.
>>
>> We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the
>> commands slightly different.
>>
>> Instead
>> camel:route-list
>> camel:context-list
>>
>> I propose to have:
>> camel-route:list
>> camel-context:list
>>
>> This would be more similar to the later sub shell commands.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> Am 05.12.2011 09:54, schrieb James Strachan:
>>> On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>>>> commands.
>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> eg
>>>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>>> Or we could even go with route:list so when there's sub shells we
>>> could do
>>>
>>> shell camel:route
>>> list
>>> start foo
>>> stop bar
>>>
>>> etc
>>>
>>
>>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I prefer that we keep as command family name a short name. "camel" is
fine but "camel-route" or "camel-context" are too long. Imagine when
operating a project on a platform, the number of characters to be typed
on the keyboard. This has an impact which is not negligible.
So why not using camel:lisr-routes, camel:list-contexts and their
shortcut clr, clc
Regards,
Charles
On 08/12/11 09:49, Christian Schneider wrote:
>
> I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call list
> or start or stop.
>
> We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the
> commands slightly different.
>
> Instead
> camel:route-list
> camel:context-list
>
> I propose to have:
> camel-route:list
> camel-context:list
>
> This would be more similar to the later sub shell commands.
>
> Christian
>
>
> Am 05.12.2011 09:54, schrieb James Strachan:
>> On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>>> commands.
>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>>>
>>>
>>> eg
>>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>> Or we could even go with route:list so when there's sub shells we
>> could do
>>
>> shell camel:route
>> list
>> start foo
>> stop bar
>>
>> etc
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
The same for me.
Best,
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 09.12.2011 12:34 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" <cl...@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> I guess people may start to become a bit confused with this. I am a bit.
>
> Anyway I would like for Camel Karaf Shell to follow the same practice
> as Karaf itself.
> So whatever you guys do there, I think is fine for Camel.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Christian Schneider <
> chris@die-schneider.net
> >> wrote
> >>
> >> karaf uses namings like:
> >> bundle:list
> >> service:list
> >>
> >> These are resource oriented what means that the scheme bundle
> references a
> >> resource type.
> >
> >
> > The are not exactly resource oriented, I would say the are "feature"
> > oriented.
> > Take for example feature:url-list or feature:url-add. The resource
> oriented
> > approach would be "feature-url:add and feature-url:list".
> > And I prefer this logic in camel too.
> >
> > In general when it comes to commands, I try to think from the
> > user perspective as much as possible. So I think, the less command
> scopes,
> > the easier for the user to use.
> > i) Less scope = faster code completion (less times the user is
> > prompted).
> > ii) Larger number of commands per subshell (the user will have to
> > switch less between sub shells).
> > iii) Easier for the user to browse the capabilities of a scope.
> >
> >
> > Now, regarding the proposal that we should wait, I am ok with it.
> However,
> > I don't feel its 100% necessary. As I wrote on the karaf mailing list,
> the
> > noun-verb norm would even allow to use nested shells.
> > So I am not sure that if we adopt the noun-verb norm we will have to
> change
> > again (as I don't see how this norm would not be a perfect fit for
> > subshells).
> >
> > --
> > *Ioannis Canellos*
> > *
> > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
> >
> > **
> > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> > **
> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer
> > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer
> > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
> > Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/>
> Committer
> > *
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I guess people may start to become a bit confused with this. I am a bit.
Anyway I would like for Camel Karaf Shell to follow the same practice
as Karaf itself.
So whatever you guys do there, I think is fine for Camel.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Christian Schneider <chris@die-schneider.net
>> wrote
>>
>> karaf uses namings like:
>> bundle:list
>> service:list
>>
>> These are resource oriented what means that the scheme bundle references a
>> resource type.
>
>
> The are not exactly resource oriented, I would say the are "feature"
> oriented.
> Take for example feature:url-list or feature:url-add. The resource oriented
> approach would be "feature-url:add and feature-url:list".
> And I prefer this logic in camel too.
>
> In general when it comes to commands, I try to think from the
> user perspective as much as possible. So I think, the less command scopes,
> the easier for the user to use.
> i) Less scope = faster code completion (less times the user is
> prompted).
> ii) Larger number of commands per subshell (the user will have to
> switch less between sub shells).
> iii) Easier for the user to browse the capabilities of a scope.
>
>
> Now, regarding the proposal that we should wait, I am ok with it. However,
> I don't feel its 100% necessary. As I wrote on the karaf mailing list, the
> noun-verb norm would even allow to use nested shells.
> So I am not sure that if we adopt the noun-verb norm we will have to change
> again (as I don't see how this norm would not be a perfect fit for
> subshells).
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer
> Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
> Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/> Committer
> *
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Christian Schneider <chris@die-schneider.net
> wrote
>
> karaf uses namings like:
> bundle:list
> service:list
>
> These are resource oriented what means that the scheme bundle references a
> resource type.
The are not exactly resource oriented, I would say the are "feature"
oriented.
Take for example feature:url-list or feature:url-add. The resource oriented
approach would be "feature-url:add and feature-url:list".
And I prefer this logic in camel too.
In general when it comes to commands, I try to think from the
user perspective as much as possible. So I think, the less command scopes,
the easier for the user to use.
i) Less scope = faster code completion (less times the user is
prompted).
ii) Larger number of commands per subshell (the user will have to
switch less between sub shells).
iii) Easier for the user to browse the capabilities of a scope.
Now, regarding the proposal that we should wait, I am ok with it. However,
I don't feel its 100% necessary. As I wrote on the karaf mailing list, the
noun-verb norm would even allow to use nested shells.
So I am not sure that if we adopt the noun-verb norm we will have to change
again (as I don't see how this norm would not be a perfect fit for
subshells).
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer
Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer
Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/> Committer
*
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
Hi Claus,
karaf uses namings like:
bundle:list
service:list
These are resource oriented what means that the scheme bundle references
a resource type.
camel:route-list
is not resource oriented. camel references a framwork.
camel-route:list
would be more similar to karaf. Of course we can not simply write
route:list as this would clash to soon with other frameworks.
Christian
Am 08.12.2011 12:54, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Christian Schneider
> <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>> I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call list or
>> start or stop.
>>
>> We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the commands
>> slightly different.
>>
>> Instead
>> camel:route-list
>> camel:context-list
>>
>> I propose to have:
>> camel-route:list
>> camel-context:list
>>
>> This would be more similar to the later sub shell commands.
>>
> Interesting perspective.
>
> However I like that everything related to camel is camel:xxxx-yyyy
> Then you would know that camel: is the standard Camel shell plugin we provide.
>
> Isn't the Karaf using that notation as well, so its bundle:xxx-yyy,
> system:xxx-yyy etc
>
>
>
>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Christian Schneider
<ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>
> I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call list or
> start or stop.
>
> We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the commands
> slightly different.
>
> Instead
> camel:route-list
> camel:context-list
>
> I propose to have:
> camel-route:list
> camel-context:list
>
> This would be more similar to the later sub shell commands.
>
Interesting perspective.
However I like that everything related to camel is camel:xxxx-yyyy
Then you would know that camel: is the standard Camel shell plugin we provide.
Isn't the Karaf using that notation as well, so its bundle:xxx-yyy,
system:xxx-yyy etc
> Christian
>
>
> Am 05.12.2011 09:54, schrieb James Strachan:
>
>> On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>>> commands.
>>>
>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>>>
>>> eg
>>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>>
>> Or we could even go with route:list so when there's sub shells we could do
>>
>> shell camel:route
>> list
>> start foo
>> stop bar
>>
>> etc
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call list
or start or stop.
We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the
commands slightly different.
Instead
camel:route-list
camel:context-list
I propose to have:
camel-route:list
camel-context:list
This would be more similar to the later sub shell commands.
Christian
Am 05.12.2011 09:54, schrieb James Strachan:
> On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the commands.
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>>
>> eg
>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
> Or we could even go with route:list so when there's sub shells we could do
>
> shell camel:route
> list
> start foo
> stop bar
>
> etc
>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@fusesource.com>.
On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the commands.
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>
> eg
> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
Or we could even go with route:list so when there's sub shells we could do
shell camel:route
list
start foo
stop bar
etc
--
James
-------
FuseSource
Email: james@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews
Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration and Messaging
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@fusesource.com>.
+1
On 2 December 2011 15:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> fully agree, and in fact, it's in my TODO list.
>
> If all are agree, I will do it :).
>
> I plan to commit Karaf sub-shell (on Karaf trunk) over the week end.
>
> What do you think to update Camel trunk to start to use sub-shell (maybe
> it's better to wait that Camel 2.9.0 is out first) ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 12/02/2011 04:29 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>> commands.
>>
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>>
>> eg
>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>>
>> I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
James
-------
FuseSource
Email: james@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews
Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration and Messaging
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> fully agree, and in fact, it's in my TODO list.
>
> If all are agree, I will do it :).
>
> I plan to commit Karaf sub-shell (on Karaf trunk) over the week end.
>
> What do you think to update Camel trunk to start to use sub-shell (maybe
> it's better to wait that Camel 2.9.0 is out first) ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 12/02/2011 04:29 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>> commands.
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.**com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-**
>> commands-norm-td3430815.html<http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html>
>>
>> eg
>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>>
>> I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer
Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer
Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/> Committer
*
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Claus,
fully agree, and in fact, it's in my TODO list.
If all are agree, I will do it :).
I plan to commit Karaf sub-shell (on Karaf trunk) over the week end.
What do you think to update Camel trunk to start to use sub-shell (maybe
it's better to wait that Camel 2.9.0 is out first) ?
Regards
JB
On 12/02/2011 04:29 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the commands.
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>
> eg
> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>
> I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Thanks Claus.
I'm working on it today ;)
Regards
JB
On 12/06/2011 06:56 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I created a ticket to track this
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4746
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Johan Edstrom<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:50 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Sent from a mobile device
>>> Am 02.12.2011 16:30 schrieb "Claus Ibsen"<cl...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>>>> commands.
>>>>
>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>>>>
>>>> eg
>>>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>>>>
>>>> I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Claus Ibsen
>>>> -----------------
>>>> FuseSource
>>>> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I created a ticket to track this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4746
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:50 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Sent from a mobile device
>> Am 02.12.2011 16:30 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" <cl...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>>> commands.
>>>
>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>>>
>>> eg
>>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>>>
>>> I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> -----------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>>
>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:50 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from a mobile device
> Am 02.12.2011 16:30 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" <cl...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
>> commands.
>>
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>>
>> eg
>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>>
>> I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> FuseSource
>> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1
Sent from a mobile device
Am 02.12.2011 16:30 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" <cl...@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the
> commands.
>
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html
>
> eg
> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list
>
> I think we should do the same for the Camel karaf commands.
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>